Does flow (inception towards death) use words to express form (life)?
"I wish we could move on" is an inaccurate phrase to describe my thoughts and I could have used better phrasing.
If we are moving aka being moved aka in response to movement; and movement doesn't use words to brand itself, then do you think in reaction to the movement that offers everything to your perception or to the suggested words of others, who want you to believe what they mean?
it would be nice if things were not as bad as they are, but they are going to get worse (more difficult) before they get better.
What if the few suggest the many to consent to believe in "order out of chaos"; hence tempting them to wait for balance; when as temporary form within ongoing flow we represent "chaos out of order" hence our need to struggle for self sustenance by adaptation through choice to balance.
Could it be that the natural order of movement represents the balance our free will of choice responses to, and that the suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice?
What if adherence to balance/choice represents our choice of need over want; and choice versus choice represents our choice of want over need?
What I am trying to express...
What if you (form) represent the choice based expression of flow? Would you then need to express yourself to other form or react to flow?
I have to ask myself, do I really want
The former implies "need"; which you then use to question "want"; thereby contradicting each other. Does form need to ask form or does it need to adapt to flow?
life to be easy
What if life moving form inception towards death represents a constant struggle to balance by choice for self sustenance? What if the choice of want over need tempts us to the easy path of ignoring the demanded struggle as form within flow?
Where is the growth in that?
What if temporary form within ongoing flow represents ONEs temporary growth potential within the ongoing loss of ALL potentiality? What if balance/choice represents loss/growth? What if temporary chaos represents the reaction to ongoing order?
I should be grateful to be alive now
Towards whom? What if form in response to flow represents choice of responsibility within balance? If self sustenance is demanded for form within flow (hence need for adaptation), then doesn't gratefulness imply ignorance of responsibility to demanded adaptation by choice of reaction?
such a pivotal point in human history and progression
What if existence within ongoing progression (flow) represents being within the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the balance where form can sustain itself by choice based reaction?
Furthermore...what if others suggest his-story to deceive humans to ignore using their choice in reaction to balance within that pivotal moment (um)? Can choice react to balance if choice consents to suggested "his-story" by the choices of others?
so that I can be an agent of positive change
A'GENT, adjective -"acting; sustaining action". What if you represent reaction within ongoing change? What if your choice to adhere to it (need) represents resonance and your choice to ignore it (want) represents dissonance?
make the world a more peaceful, loving, creative place.
What if balance is within the natural order of forward movement (flow) and the resulting form within represents temporary chaos utilized for growth potential to balance the loss of potentiality through flow?
Creation implies out of nothing, yet what if we can only transmute out of everything? Can you create "new" without reacting to what inspired you before? Try to create a new thought without transmuting it out of what you already perceive...
Neo (new) cannot exist within the Matrix (the cavity in which any thing is formed).
Does flow (inception towards death) use words to express form (life)?
If we are moving aka being moved aka in response to movement; and movement doesn't use words to brand itself, then do you think in reaction to the movement that offers everything to your perception or to the suggested words of others, who want you to believe what they mean?
What if the few suggest the many to consent to believe in "order out of chaos"; hence tempting them to wait for balance; when as temporary form within ongoing flow we represent "chaos out of order" hence our need to struggle for self sustenance by adaptation through choice to balance.
Could it be that the natural order of movement represents the balance our free will of choice responses to, and that the suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice?
What if adherence to balance/choice represents our choice of need over want; and choice versus choice represents our choice of want over need?
What if you (form) represent the choice based expression of flow? Would you then need to express yourself to other form or react to flow?
The former implies "need"; which you then use to question "want"; thereby contradicting each other. Does form need to ask form or does it need to adapt to flow?
What if life moving form inception towards death represents a constant struggle to balance by choice for self sustenance? What if the choice of want over need tempts us to the easy path of ignoring the demanded struggle as form within flow?
What if temporary form within ongoing flow represents ONEs temporary growth potential within the ongoing loss of ALL potentiality? What if balance/choice represents loss/growth? What if temporary chaos represents the reaction to ongoing order?
Towards whom? What if form in response to flow represents choice of responsibility within balance? If self sustenance is demanded for form within flow (hence need for adaptation), then doesn't gratefulness imply ignorance of responsibility to demanded adaptation by choice of reaction?
What if existence within ongoing progression (flow) represents being within the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the balance where form can sustain itself by choice based reaction?
Furthermore...what if others suggest his-story to deceive humans to ignore using their choice in reaction to balance within that pivotal moment (um)? Can choice react to balance if choice consents to suggested "his-story" by the choices of others?
A'GENT, adjective -"acting; sustaining action". What if you represent reaction within ongoing change? What if your choice to adhere to it (need) represents resonance and your choice to ignore it (want) represents dissonance?
What if balance is within the natural order of forward movement (flow) and the resulting form within represents temporary chaos utilized for growth potential to balance the loss of potentiality through flow?
Creation implies out of nothing, yet what if we can only transmute out of everything? Can you create "new" without reacting to what inspired you before? Try to create a new thought without transmuting it out of what you already perceive...
Neo (new) cannot exist within the Matrix (the cavity in which any thing is formed).
fuck off bot.