101
posted ago by axolotl_peyotl ago by axolotl_peyotl +103 / -2

Found this comment in the wild on reddit.

I compiled and shared my "skeptic's guide to vaccines" almost a decade ago.

At that time, even the most diehard conspiracy theorists/researchers were hesitant to question the vaccine paradigm.

Now the normies are wondering that perhaps they shouldn't pump their infants with literal toxins and poisons for "diseases" that are almost entirely fabricated.

To the doomers: THIS is the best possible way to wake people up. It never would've happened otherwise. That's why I remain optimistic for our future.

Comments (38)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +5 / -2

skepticism

SCEP'TIC, noun [Gr. from to look about, to consider, to speculate.] The -ism implies that you consent to believe or not believe a suggestion from others (vaccines); which contradicts being skeptic. One cannot "look about" while being restricted to what other ones suggest one to "look onto".

Try to be skeptic; while resisting the suggested -isms from others. Nature doesn't offer anything that requires those within to consent to believe it; instead it offers everything, while demanding adaptation by choice of reaction.

1
BlackDay2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok I'll do something no one else does. I'll engage, since this is the first comment from you that I actually bothered reading and actually understood.

You could have phrased it simply, but you didn't. Like this:

Simply believing either side (even for what to look into) isn't true skepticism.

Nature doesn't require one to hold one belief or another. Our beliefs drive our actions which drive the consequences we face. When certain beliefs lead to painful consequences for us, nature doesn't relent. Therefore, in a way, it demands we adapt our beliefs based on which consequences we wish to get.

Your comment is of tangential relevance. One of the reasons people ignore you. Why do you pick such convoluted language to express your opinion? Then you skip logical steps in between. Does it make you feel superior that others cannot understand what you're saying?

Why, Mr. Anderson, why do you persist?


And I don't agree that skepticism means "you consent to believe or not believe a suggestion from others". Skepticism about a topic is merely a collective term to describe those who do not buy it, regardless of whether or not they were put on that path by suggestion from others. Individuals may have their own experiences that led to it. They are still counted under the umbrella term "skepticism".

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

And I don't agree that skepticism means "you consent to believe or not believe a suggestion from others". Skepticism about a topic is merely a collective term to describe those who do not buy it, regardless of whether or not they were put on that path by suggestion from others. Individuals may have their own experiences that led to it. They are still counted under the umbrella term "skepticism".

All -isms represent a contract between choice and choice; in ignorance of the balance that defines the choice (choice represents response to balance). Nature does not offer -isms; it does not suggest information for those within to choose to believe or not believe.

You are deceived to believe in "terms to describe"; while ignoring that nature does not use terms to describe itself; instead it moves us; which our senses perceive as inspiration to react to by choice (free will). This represents "free" will of choice reacting to the "dom"-inating boundaries within balance aka free-dom. TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.]

All words are suggested to you by the free will of choice of those who suggest them, and consenting by choice to believe suggestion by choice represents submission of free will to free will. That represents the parasitic few taking over by use of suggestions; which when consented to gives their free will of choice the power to act in the name of what the many consent to believe. The perception of the many was then tricked to perceived through the lens of self inflicted beliefs; defined by others.

As choice (form) within balance (flow); agreement versus non-agreement does not exist, because form is demanded to adapt to flow; choice reacts to balance; momentum (resistance) is defined by motion (velocity). If you throw a ball; then the velocity of it will cause a temporary momentum which sustains the form of the ball within velocity. We exist within such a momentum as life (form) within the movement from inception towards death (flow), we are balancing and now have the free will of choice to adhere to that struggle (need) or ignore it for the temptation of flow pulling form towards the end (want).

If you choose to believe or not believe any suggestion; you will find yourself in a conflict with all those who choose the opposite, and your reactions also represent the temptation for all those who did not choose to make a choice upon your proclamations. This conflict represents "reason" aka the conflict between true and false. For the few it represents division (reason) through suggestion (-ism), and they also sustain these conflicts among the many by suggesting both sides endless contradictions to reason about...this is called talmudic reasoning.

Nature does not offer you false information...it doesn't offer any proclaimed true information either. It doesn't brand anything with words; because movement changes meaning of everything within movement. As a species we are tricked to idolize meaning by those who suggest meaning as words to us. This is called spell-craft.

All these "umbrella terms" represent idols used by the few to farm the ignorance of the many. Real communication does not represents choice and choice agreeing on suggested meaning; but choice adhering to balance aka temporary form resisting ongoing velocity, which causes resonance. When velocity meets resistance it causes friction; vibration; resonance. That represents the sound we choose to shape words out of, and using choice to evaluate the shaped sound (suggested meaning of words) deceives us to ignore the movement causing sound and choice to react to it. As ONE within ALL...ALL represents ongoing value; ONE represents temporary choice of evaluation thereof.

You could have phrased it simply, but you didn't.

I strip language down from all the complex rhetoric attached to it; to things like flow/form; ALL/ONE; because it strips ignorance of complexity to hide behind. The ignorance of others stems from their choice of "wanting" suggested information from me; which tempts them to judge what they read as true or false information; which they then want or not want. Both these choices ignore "need" of reaction to balance aka adaptation by choice to perceived inspiration.

Try to use inspiration over information by utilizing implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false). If/then implies reactions within movement; while true vs false imply conflict about affixed states that ignore moving.

Simply believing either side (even for what to look into) isn't true skepticism.

Skepticism represents a deliberate contradiction in terms aka looking about (skeptic) and submission to suggested belief (-ism). Your use of true; implies false, which represents the conflict of reason. So you already choose to consent to believe the suggestion of "true" and "false".

Try to give me an example where nature offers your perception "false" information or where other life-forms are reasoning about the true vs false of meaning? Why is it that other life-forms can perceive; comprehend and react to "grass" without anyone telling them that it's called "grass"? Could it be that moving "grass" is how nature communicates all the inspiration needed for others to perceive; comprehend and react to it?

What if trying to brand everything in existence with (endlessly contradicting) words; is designed by the few to fill up the conscious memory of the many; as to restrict their grow potential (comprehension)?

What if lies represent the suggested contradiction of all those who believe truth while ignoring constant change?

As for "either side"...reason represents the sides and consent to believe suggestion causes reason. As life in-between inception and death; there are no conflicting sides; but coexisting natural opposites, which define the balance for those within. Tell me...what does conflict within energy represent?

Our beliefs drive our actions...

When you choose to "act" you ignore that choice reacts to balance. Flow drives our form; as form we need to resist flow by choice of reaction to balance. Instead the parasitic few managed to trick the ignorant many to consent to want; to seek; to work towards...progress. They use temptation to lure form back to flow.

our actions which drive the consequences we face

The consequences of your reactions as form to flow represent how you shape form within the momentum of flow aka transmutation (flow/form) out of base (energy).

nature doesn't relent

You represent the temporary relenting force (resisting form) within the ongoing force (velocity of flow); you represent temporary chaos out of ongoing order; you represent temporary growth potential out of ongoing loss of potentiality; you represent magnetic resistance to electric velocity; you represent the choice of growth within loss.

Therefore, in a way, it demands we adapt our beliefs based on which consequences we wish to get.

The "way" represents forward motion from beginning towards end (flow) for the choice of balance in-between (form). All beliefs represent the ignorance of flow for consent to believe suggestions by other form. Movement demands adaptation by choice; choice to ignore adaptation within movement (balancing) represents stagnation of comprehension (potential); causing corruption of form.

Question that suggested beliefs are not needed; but always wanted or not wanted. Want represents the temptation to ignore need as form within flow.

Your comment is of tangential relevance.

ALL represents ONE in energy. REL'EVANT, adjective [Latin relever, to relieve, to advance, to raise; re and lever, to raise.] represents growth potential (form) within loss of potentiality (flow). A choice. Irrelevant represents the choice to ignore growth for loss; which tempts us to ignore resistance for.

COMMENT, verb intransitive - "to write notes on the works of an author". That's an issue; for flow authorizes ALL for each ONE form within, yet us using words tempts us to ignore ongoing inspiration for suggested information.

One of the reasons people ignore you.

Reason originates in the choice of ignorance (want) over adherence (need) to self sustenance. Instead try to use what is written as inspiration; cause then I don't represent the source thereof anymore; but just another vessel within motion.

Why do you pick such convoluted language to express your opinion?

Others want to believe what others suggest; they are domesticated to reason about meaning; to parrot suggested information to each other; to ignore growing their comprehension by adaptation to inspiration. They are deceived to believe that agreeing to believe the suggestions of others represents comprehending reality.

I comprehend what others are doing; which boils down to choosing want over need aka ignorance over adherence. Whatever they say is shaped in ignorance; which I use as inspiration to adapt to; which tremendously helps me grow my own comprehension. I learned/taught myself that I cannot change the choice of others to choose need over want; because only ONE has the sole authority over self to choose (ONEs free will of choice).

So instead of trying to change others; I grow myself, and while comprehending ignorance I found out that I can strip the tools others use to hide their ignorance. Believers now cannot use their suggested -isms anymore; and since I don't consent to reason either; they attempts to lure me into a conflict become impotent. What I now write has to be either straight up ignored; or engaged without defense. Others can use me as a tool to grow themselves; because whatever you throw at me; I can usually bring into the perspective of natural law; while ripping out the parasites inversions acting upon it.

What you perceive as convoluted represents my state of potential (comprehension); which I use unrestricted to adapt to what inspires me. I neither offer (starting threads) nor judge (no up/down votes); Instead I choose to stay in balance and it works for me. If I intent to write all of this for others; then their ignorance would devastate by hope of reaching them. Instead I use writing for growing myself; which is why I can adapt to inspiration more and more effortlessly.

Then you skip logical steps in between

LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason]. That represents you wanting to find confirmation about true versus false within the conflict of reason you consent to believe in. I'm not within a conflict; I'm struggling in-between balance and skipping (to omit) adaptation represents my choice of ignorance; which I struggle to resist by choosing need over want.

Does it make you feel superior that others cannot understand what you're saying?

I learned that ignorance tempts insolence; which helped me become calmer and calmer when flooded with ignorant accusations. The few on the other hand display their insolence to the ignorant masses over and over again. They're holding the mirror to mass ignorance so that the many experience their own ignorant behavior, and yet...more ignorance.

Anyway...ONE cannot make another ONE understand ALL, for only ONE can choose to adhere to ALL to grow ONEself. Perception to comprehension by choice of reaction represents the transmutation of ALL perceived potentiality into ONEs comprehended potential aka the temporary magnetic ONE needs to choose the offered power of the ongoing electric ALL. Other ONEs represent both inspiration and temptation to our choice, and the way they react (move) represents needed inspiration; while whatever they suggest represents wanted temptation. Resist them.

why do you persist?

PERSIST', verb intransitive [Latin persisto; per and sisto, to stand or be fixed.] I represent form within flow; your beliefs represent the affixed perception of the movement you choose to ignore.

1
BlackDay2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry I was a little aggressive. I wasn't sure if you were trolling. You did explain yourself, so you're not trolling.

I made it through a third of your comment. This will require study to respond to. But believe it or not, I can actually relate to and agree with some of the things you're saying, having realized some of it for myself and also from my pondering over stuff from Hindu philosophy. That goes over many of the topics you touch on, but most stuff is in Sanskrit. Translations mangle the meaning (I'm sure a language watcher like you can appreciate that).

I'll contact you if/when I get through this stuff. But you know, you're way out of normal (don't mean that in a bad way). Makes me wonder who you are and what you do.

If you were in Academia, I suppose you'd like Math. It has it's own language, axioms and logic formally defined and is independent of the world. Timeless and exact. Black and white.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry

No need for...justifications for former reactions represent the temptation to ignore reaction to balance as well; since justifications are aimed at the choice of others. Instead let each of your reactions be the representation of what you learned/taught yourself since the last one.

Form balancing by choice within momentum shapes form; which represents perceived inspiration for all the other form.

This will require study to respond to.

Try to adapt off the cuffs to whatever inspires. The more frequent you do; the more efficient you become. The consciousness is suppose to be used like a ram aka temporary storage of information ; for ongoing adaptation to inspiration; and not like a hard-drive, we fill up with information; while "studying" from memory; instead of by direct adaptation for balance.

STUDY, noun [Latin , to study that is, to set the thought or mind.]. If we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death); then we were already set; and are now responding by free will of choice to balance.

Filling our memory represents temptation; which restricts our comprehension. To remember (from memory) within momentum of motion represents retaining knowledge that was before; which implies ignoring knowledge that is right now.

KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" and what we are perceiving represents moving form aka inspiration to react to by choice, which then applies growth/loss (depending on choice) upon our understanding (comprehension).

We are being deceived to consent by choice to believe the suggested information by the choice of others; which they define as knowledge. Seek knowledge through education they suggest; yet seek (want) represents the ignorance of need (adaptation to perceived inspiration aka ALL knowledge offered to each ONE within).

Anyway; to teach/learn represents the same reaction when utilized for the sustenance of self (your choice of need over want), because to teach self equals to learn for self and vice versa. Meanwhile education tricks us to consent to be students under teacher aka choice under suggested choice; while ignoring balance/choice.

But believe it or not...

a) to believe implies towards a suggestion made by the choice of others; which implies ignoring ones own choice being in reaction to balance. I'm over consenting to suggestion of others.

b) not aka nothing; implies ignorance of everything (ALL is ONE in energy); and since ALL doesn't offer the perception of the ONEs within "nothingness"; you got it by consenting to believe the suggestions of others; who simply suggested you to believe the inversion of everything. That btw represents the main modus operandi of our parasites....suggesting inversion towards our free will of choice.

I can actually relate to and agree with some of the things you're saying

RELA'TE, verb transitive [Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.]. Energy (the source of ALL information) represents the production of ongoing flow (loss of potentiality); which causes within its momentum the temporary form (growth of potential). As ONE within ALL we don't create; we transmute out of base (energy).

As for agreement...flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) causes friction; vibration and resonance, which our choice needs to resonate with by choosing to balance. Agreeing to the suggested choices of others represents the choice to ignore balance for suggested choice; which causes dissonance among us.

Ongoing flow represents the natural order; while temporary form represents chaos out of order; hence our struggle to sustain ourselves by adaption. The parasites suggest us to consent to believe in the inversion...wanting order out of chaos (phoenix out of the ashes allegory). The whole us versus them conflict is being suggested to deceive us to seek to win; to just defeat chaos to attain order; which as chaos out of order represents ignorance of natural order (flow) and therewith self destruction of form.

Try to use need over want; inspiration over information and implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false) when reading anything. Also try to resist attaching what you read to who you believe suggested it; especially on technology designed to do that (DARPA's world wide web). This isn't communication; you sit in front of a screen (Plato's Allegory of the Cave); suggested and controlled by the military industrial complex; who work towards the transhumanist agenda of exchanging 1 (natural reality) with 0 (digital fiction).

from Hindu philosophy

PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. love, to love, and wisdom.] aka want of knowledge; yet knowledge (perception) requires adaptation by choice of need over want for us to grow comprehension.

Hindu-ISM; like all the other suggested -ism represents suggested information towards our wants. If one comprehends this ONE can use it as inspiration from ALL and adapt to it by choice of reaction, but all the -isms are designed as temptations to fall for; to believe in; to have faith in; to submit to etc.

Underneath all religions (to bind anew) operates the original bond...flow/form; balance/choice; offer/consent, and ALL that is offered to each ONE represents the same energy (source of ALL information). If one comprehends this; one has the foundation all suggested religions and any other institutions (or form itself) are transmuted out of. This allows reverse engineering at will; which usually just wholesale dumps the sales-pitches used to get us to consent to believe.

Energy represents a self sustaining system (loss/growth) and we need to struggle to adhere to it (need) over ignoring it (want). The temptation of want is dominating; because the velocity of flow pulling us is ongoing; while our resistance as form is temporary. We are processed as both loss/growth, yet have the free will of choice to grow within loss aka being ONE limited potential within ALL unlimited potentiality offered to us. The few do everything they can to corrupt our comprehension of this; because they can only control the many that consent to ignore their potential.

That goes over many of the topics you touch on...

ALL represents ONE in energy. If ONE comprehends this; then ALL can be put into the same perspective; no matter how much ONE comprehends of ALL perceived. TOP'IC, noun [Gr. place; Latin topicus, topica.]..we are all within the same place (energy); within the same moment(um) of motion. Our placement as form within flow is within the same energy aka coexistence of collective potentiality (flow) and individual potential (form). Flow/form aka motion/momentum represent balance, and choice operates within balance.

Translations mangle the meaning (I'm sure a language watcher like you can appreciate that).

That's the main deception driving all suggestions...words to define affixed meanings (true or false) for a constantly changing system. Nature does not offer words; it does not offer branded information for us to believe...we shape sound into word to deceive each other by suggestion into idolatry of meaning. Those few who suggest meaning (in the beginning was the word...) gain the consent of the many; which allow them to act in the name of (in nomine) the idolized words.

All words in all languages represent suggested information towards our choice to believe it; which in return deceives us to ignore using choice as reaction to balance by adaptation to inspiration. I recently ran into a quote that describes this slightly different..."Word has no inherent value, as it was invented as a counterfeit and fictitious value to represent natural values in commerce." Try to play through the implications of that and consider suggested words as "spell-craft" and suggestion as "transmutation of comprehension by temptation". The few simply use alchemy upon the many aka transmutation out of base; and they use it to deceive us to ignore how base (energy) operates and that we are in it...out of it.

I take languages apart to de-masquerade our choice of ignorance; which uses the idols of words to shirk responsibility over choice within balance onto. The many hide ignorance behind beliefs (suggested words as idols of meaning); and the few represent the parasitic response to that aka exploitation of ignorance by suggestion.

I'll contact you if/when I get through this stuff.

No rush. Use me as a tool to throw stuff at and watch how I adapt to whatever inspires.

But you know, you're way out of normal (don't mean that in a bad way). Makes me wonder who you are and what you do.

Just ONE within ALL; struggling to balance by resisting temptations.

If you were in Academia, I suppose you'd like Math.

The only designation of a unit within ALL represents ONEself. PROB'LEM, noun [Latin problema; Gr. to throw forward, and to throw; Latin pello.] aka flow throwing forward form (momentum). There are no mathematical problems within ALL; just lack of comprehension within each ONE; based on their choices of reaction to ALL.

The few suggested numbers to deceive us to ignore the ONE; and they suggest problems to deceive us to want SOLU'TION, noun [Latin solutio, from solvo, to loosen, melt, dissolve.] which represents transmutation of form back to flow (aka death). They suggest us to want "progress"; which represents us following along flow as form aka self destruction. The entire beast system (society aka a chain of command pyramid scheme) is designed around that suggestion of progress, and the few simply farming the ignorance of the many who keep choosing want over need.

It has it's own language, axioms and logic formally defined and is independent of the world.

That's because it tricks us to ignore coexistence of everything within the world. LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]. Reason represents the conflict between true vs false; based upon whatever we consent to believe or not believe is true or false. Reason represents division (conflict) by suggestion of -isms (idolized meaning).

We are tricked to reason about the suggestions of other choices; while ignoring the offer of ALL within balance to each ONE. Once reason as division is established by suggestion; the few suggest contradictions to both sides within reason to keep it going, which is called "talmudic reasoning" and the the very same talmud teaches its followers to use implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false). Why? To protect the farmhands who feed the cattle with suggestion of contradictions, to fall for the temptation to believe or not believe it.

Timeless and exact.

Time represents the measurement of movement, and the few suggest past; present and future to deceive the many to consent to believe is affixed states within movement; which deceives them to ignore constant adaptation to motion.

EXACT', adjective. [Latin exactus, from exigo, to drive; ex and ago. Gr. to drive, urge or press.] aka flow upon form. ALL is exact; because ALL is moving, and we represent the ONEs within reacting to it.

No room for beliefs haha.

Belief represents the choice of ignorance (want over need); which is required for balance. Self sustenance (need) and ignorance (want) represent coexisting natural opposites aka growth/loss aka the energizing aspect of energy; the self sustenance of ALL information.

0
Clobro 0 points ago +1 / -1

Here we go with the Tard-Bot....

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0