Elite (aka selection; choice) implies one using free will of choice to select others as the "chosen ones"; while ignoring that oneself represents the one with the choice.
The suggested rhetoric of "elite" represents a sleight of hand for those who resist the choice ignorance; and a vetting process for those ignorant enough to brand others as the chosen ones (elites). When the few hear the many call them "elite"; they comprehend that it translates to "I ignore my free will of choice". "elite" tricks the ignorant to flash their impotence aka their ignored potential.
As for suffering...choice represents reaction to balance, and choosing by choice to react to balance over ignoring it (need over want) represents self sustenance through adaptation by choice of reaction to balance. This is why those who wield choice (elites) suffer less than those who ignore to wield choice.
Parasitic behavior represents a reaction to a weakness within the host. They suggest by choice; we consent by choice. That's the weakness of ignoring to use choice in reaction to balance, to instead submit to the suggested choices of others. This choice of ignorance is what tempts others to use suggestion to parasitically exploit it, and ignorance also tempts insolence towards the ignorant; because they rather blame others (calling them parasites) then to question their own choice of ignorance.
Notice how the parasitic few both suggest the many to blame each other; while also utilizing blame directed at themselves for protection by claiming persecution?
Elite (aka selection; choice) implies one using free will of choice to select others as the "chosen ones"; while ignoring that oneself represents the one with the choice.
The suggested rhetoric of "elite" represents a sleight of hand for those who resist the choice ignorance; and a vetting process for those ignorant enough to brand others as the chosen ones (elites). When the few hear the many call them "elite"; they comprehend that it translates to "I ignore my free will of choice". "elite" tricks the ignorant to flash their impotence aka their ignored potential.
As for suffering...choice represents reaction to balance, and choosing by choice to react to balance over ignoring it (need over want) represents self sustenance through adaptation by choice of reaction to balance. This is why those who wield choice (elites) suffer less than those who ignore to wield choice.
Parasitic behavior represents a reaction to a weakness within the host. They suggest by choice; we consent by choice. That's the weakness of ignoring to use choice in reaction to balance, to instead submit to the suggested choices of others. This choice of ignorance is what tempts others to use suggestion to parasitically exploit it, and ignorance also tempts insolence towards the ignorant; because they rather blame others (calling them parasites) then to question their own choice of ignorance.
Notice how the parasitic few both suggest the many to blame each other; while also utilizing blame directed at themselves for protection by claiming persecution?