Found this comment in the wild on reddit.
I compiled and shared my "skeptic's guide to vaccines" almost a decade ago.
At that time, even the most diehard conspiracy theorists/researchers were hesitant to question the vaccine paradigm.
Now the normies are wondering that perhaps they shouldn't pump their infants with literal toxins and poisons for "diseases" that are almost entirely fabricated.
To the doomers: THIS is the best possible way to wake people up. It never would've happened otherwise. That's why I remain optimistic for our future.
I was born in 78. My mom said they did a few vaxxes in the hospital but when it was time for school she couldn't afford the doctor so she forged my vax records. I went all through school until college with just what they gave me at the hospital.
I got a scholarship for college and they required a bunch of vaxxes. Mom took me and we were both questioning it all but the doc just shrugged off our concerns. Had she known what would happen to me she said she would have found a way to fight it. Long story but I am severely vax injured and have been dealing with the fallout for 20+ years.
My mom and I both became staunch anti-vaxxers. My brother falls for the 'you were just unlucky' and vaxxes his kids. One of them stopped talking within hours of one of the shots and it looked like her muscles in her mouth weren't moving right. She's in speech therapy when before she was just fine.
My job recently mandated the covid and flu vaxxes even for remote workers (I've always been remote) and I'm waiting to hear back on my religious exemption. Knowing HR they will just fire me because it plays into their virtue signaling game.
I have a nephew who stopped talking for about a year, and it was very sudden. He was very young when it started, maybe around 5 years old (about 9-10 years ago), and up until that point he talked normally. He was taken to many specialists all over the country and then suddenly, basically out of no where, he started talking again. When he was asked why he stopped talking he said he didn’t have anything to say. My sister thought it may have been related to a vaccine, I seem to recall her thinking he had the flu vaccine right around the time it happened. But it didn’t stop my sister from recently getting a covid vaccine smh.
What symptoms did you have because of those vaccines?
I ended up with rubella from the MMR and the doctor insisted on continuing with the rest of the required vaccines. I got sicker and sicker and had such a crazy high fever my mom dumped me in the tub with cold water and ice and called our Indian medicine man (the 'white man' doctors had f'd me up so she wasn't about to take me to the hospital).
Looking back on it she said she she thinks it was encephalitis. Our medicine man had her give me ton supplements including huge doses of vitamin C. Eventually the fever and hallucinations and vomiting stopped and he had her continue with more supplements. It was already too late.
I started having all kinds of odd issues and I was called a hypochondriac. I was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (at 17) and that lasted for about 5 or 6 years and was also diagnosed with 'chronic fatigue'. I did research and begged to have my thyroid checked but I was 'too young' for it to be an issue. Years and years later I finally found a doctor willing to test it and it was stupid low and I began taking dessicated thyroid.
When I moved to Arizona where I could order my own blood work, I have been able to keep my hormones balanced and it turns out I have hashimoto's thyroiditis along with other random autoimmune problems. I did find a naturepath who is willing to work with me (not covered by insurance, of course) but it has been a long, hard road to get remotely normal. I was 35 when I finally managed to get everything balanced and the damage was done at 17.
The autoimmune issues will always be with me. My thyroid is being destroyed by my immune system. My pancreas was as well but I think I have gotten that under control. I still get hives occasionally and have never been able to wear makeup. I have to check the ingredients on everything. My naturepath has me on low dose naltrexone which has been a miracle worker. I also take a lot of supplements.
Here's why they are lying. Money. Ivermectin has many generics and is very cheap. The big pharma industry is greedy and wants the government to pay for expensive "clot shots". Get the real info here about Ivermectin:
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/12kFdrrZTR/ivermectin-tier-list-and-guide-u/c
Share with others to save lives! The clot shot not only makes them money, but kills innocents. A double whammy.
SCEP'TIC, noun [Gr. from to look about, to consider, to speculate.] The -ism implies that you consent to believe or not believe a suggestion from others (vaccines); which contradicts being skeptic. One cannot "look about" while being restricted to what other ones suggest one to "look onto".
Try to be skeptic; while resisting the suggested -isms from others. Nature doesn't offer anything that requires those within to consent to believe it; instead it offers everything, while demanding adaptation by choice of reaction.
Ok I'll do something no one else does. I'll engage, since this is the first comment from you that I actually bothered reading and actually understood.
You could have phrased it simply, but you didn't. Like this:
Your comment is of tangential relevance. One of the reasons people ignore you. Why do you pick such convoluted language to express your opinion? Then you skip logical steps in between. Does it make you feel superior that others cannot understand what you're saying?
Why, Mr. Anderson, why do you persist?
And I don't agree that skepticism means "you consent to believe or not believe a suggestion from others". Skepticism about a topic is merely a collective term to describe those who do not buy it, regardless of whether or not they were put on that path by suggestion from others. Individuals may have their own experiences that led to it. They are still counted under the umbrella term "skepticism".
All -isms represent a contract between choice and choice; in ignorance of the balance that defines the choice (choice represents response to balance). Nature does not offer -isms; it does not suggest information for those within to choose to believe or not believe.
You are deceived to believe in "terms to describe"; while ignoring that nature does not use terms to describe itself; instead it moves us; which our senses perceive as inspiration to react to by choice (free will). This represents "free" will of choice reacting to the "dom"-inating boundaries within balance aka free-dom. TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.]
All words are suggested to you by the free will of choice of those who suggest them, and consenting by choice to believe suggestion by choice represents submission of free will to free will. That represents the parasitic few taking over by use of suggestions; which when consented to gives their free will of choice the power to act in the name of what the many consent to believe. The perception of the many was then tricked to perceived through the lens of self inflicted beliefs; defined by others.
As choice (form) within balance (flow); agreement versus non-agreement does not exist, because form is demanded to adapt to flow; choice reacts to balance; momentum (resistance) is defined by motion (velocity). If you throw a ball; then the velocity of it will cause a temporary momentum which sustains the form of the ball within velocity. We exist within such a momentum as life (form) within the movement from inception towards death (flow), we are balancing and now have the free will of choice to adhere to that struggle (need) or ignore it for the temptation of flow pulling form towards the end (want).
If you choose to believe or not believe any suggestion; you will find yourself in a conflict with all those who choose the opposite, and your reactions also represent the temptation for all those who did not choose to make a choice upon your proclamations. This conflict represents "reason" aka the conflict between true and false. For the few it represents division (reason) through suggestion (-ism), and they also sustain these conflicts among the many by suggesting both sides endless contradictions to reason about...this is called talmudic reasoning.
Nature does not offer you false information...it doesn't offer any proclaimed true information either. It doesn't brand anything with words; because movement changes meaning of everything within movement. As a species we are tricked to idolize meaning by those who suggest meaning as words to us. This is called spell-craft.
All these "umbrella terms" represent idols used by the few to farm the ignorance of the many. Real communication does not represents choice and choice agreeing on suggested meaning; but choice adhering to balance aka temporary form resisting ongoing velocity, which causes resonance. When velocity meets resistance it causes friction; vibration; resonance. That represents the sound we choose to shape words out of, and using choice to evaluate the shaped sound (suggested meaning of words) deceives us to ignore the movement causing sound and choice to react to it. As ONE within ALL...ALL represents ongoing value; ONE represents temporary choice of evaluation thereof.
I strip language down from all the complex rhetoric attached to it; to things like flow/form; ALL/ONE; because it strips ignorance of complexity to hide behind. The ignorance of others stems from their choice of "wanting" suggested information from me; which tempts them to judge what they read as true or false information; which they then want or not want. Both these choices ignore "need" of reaction to balance aka adaptation by choice to perceived inspiration.
Try to use inspiration over information by utilizing implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false). If/then implies reactions within movement; while true vs false imply conflict about affixed states that ignore moving.
Skepticism represents a deliberate contradiction in terms aka looking about (skeptic) and submission to suggested belief (-ism). Your use of true; implies false, which represents the conflict of reason. So you already choose to consent to believe the suggestion of "true" and "false".
Try to give me an example where nature offers your perception "false" information or where other life-forms are reasoning about the true vs false of meaning? Why is it that other life-forms can perceive; comprehend and react to "grass" without anyone telling them that it's called "grass"? Could it be that moving "grass" is how nature communicates all the inspiration needed for others to perceive; comprehend and react to it?
What if trying to brand everything in existence with (endlessly contradicting) words; is designed by the few to fill up the conscious memory of the many; as to restrict their grow potential (comprehension)?
What if lies represent the suggested contradiction of all those who believe truth while ignoring constant change?
As for "either side"...reason represents the sides and consent to believe suggestion causes reason. As life in-between inception and death; there are no conflicting sides; but coexisting natural opposites, which define the balance for those within. Tell me...what does conflict within energy represent?
When you choose to "act" you ignore that choice reacts to balance. Flow drives our form; as form we need to resist flow by choice of reaction to balance. Instead the parasitic few managed to trick the ignorant many to consent to want; to seek; to work towards...progress. They use temptation to lure form back to flow.
The consequences of your reactions as form to flow represent how you shape form within the momentum of flow aka transmutation (flow/form) out of base (energy).
You represent the temporary relenting force (resisting form) within the ongoing force (velocity of flow); you represent temporary chaos out of ongoing order; you represent temporary growth potential out of ongoing loss of potentiality; you represent magnetic resistance to electric velocity; you represent the choice of growth within loss.
The "way" represents forward motion from beginning towards end (flow) for the choice of balance in-between (form). All beliefs represent the ignorance of flow for consent to believe suggestions by other form. Movement demands adaptation by choice; choice to ignore adaptation within movement (balancing) represents stagnation of comprehension (potential); causing corruption of form.
Question that suggested beliefs are not needed; but always wanted or not wanted. Want represents the temptation to ignore need as form within flow.
ALL represents ONE in energy. REL'EVANT, adjective [Latin relever, to relieve, to advance, to raise; re and lever, to raise.] represents growth potential (form) within loss of potentiality (flow). A choice. Irrelevant represents the choice to ignore growth for loss; which tempts us to ignore resistance for.
COMMENT, verb intransitive - "to write notes on the works of an author". That's an issue; for flow authorizes ALL for each ONE form within, yet us using words tempts us to ignore ongoing inspiration for suggested information.
Reason originates in the choice of ignorance (want) over adherence (need) to self sustenance. Instead try to use what is written as inspiration; cause then I don't represent the source thereof anymore; but just another vessel within motion.
Others want to believe what others suggest; they are domesticated to reason about meaning; to parrot suggested information to each other; to ignore growing their comprehension by adaptation to inspiration. They are deceived to believe that agreeing to believe the suggestions of others represents comprehending reality.
I comprehend what others are doing; which boils down to choosing want over need aka ignorance over adherence. Whatever they say is shaped in ignorance; which I use as inspiration to adapt to; which tremendously helps me grow my own comprehension. I learned/taught myself that I cannot change the choice of others to choose need over want; because only ONE has the sole authority over self to choose (ONEs free will of choice).
So instead of trying to change others; I grow myself, and while comprehending ignorance I found out that I can strip the tools others use to hide their ignorance. Believers now cannot use their suggested -isms anymore; and since I don't consent to reason either; they attempts to lure me into a conflict become impotent. What I now write has to be either straight up ignored; or engaged without defense. Others can use me as a tool to grow themselves; because whatever you throw at me; I can usually bring into the perspective of natural law; while ripping out the parasites inversions acting upon it.
What you perceive as convoluted represents my state of potential (comprehension); which I use unrestricted to adapt to what inspires me. I neither offer (starting threads) nor judge (no up/down votes); Instead I choose to stay in balance and it works for me. If I intent to write all of this for others; then their ignorance would devastate by hope of reaching them. Instead I use writing for growing myself; which is why I can adapt to inspiration more and more effortlessly.
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason]. That represents you wanting to find confirmation about true versus false within the conflict of reason you consent to believe in. I'm not within a conflict; I'm struggling in-between balance and skipping (to omit) adaptation represents my choice of ignorance; which I struggle to resist by choosing need over want.
I learned that ignorance tempts insolence; which helped me become calmer and calmer when flooded with ignorant accusations. The few on the other hand display their insolence to the ignorant masses over and over again. They're holding the mirror to mass ignorance so that the many experience their own ignorant behavior, and yet...more ignorance.
Anyway...ONE cannot make another ONE understand ALL, for only ONE can choose to adhere to ALL to grow ONEself. Perception to comprehension by choice of reaction represents the transmutation of ALL perceived potentiality into ONEs comprehended potential aka the temporary magnetic ONE needs to choose the offered power of the ongoing electric ALL. Other ONEs represent both inspiration and temptation to our choice, and the way they react (move) represents needed inspiration; while whatever they suggest represents wanted temptation. Resist them.
PERSIST', verb intransitive [Latin persisto; per and sisto, to stand or be fixed.] I represent form within flow; your beliefs represent the affixed perception of the movement you choose to ignore.
I'm sorry I was a little aggressive. I wasn't sure if you were trolling. You did explain yourself, so you're not trolling.
I made it through a third of your comment. This will require study to respond to. But believe it or not, I can actually relate to and agree with some of the things you're saying, having realized some of it for myself and also from my pondering over stuff from Hindu philosophy. That goes over many of the topics you touch on, but most stuff is in Sanskrit. Translations mangle the meaning (I'm sure a language watcher like you can appreciate that).
I'll contact you if/when I get through this stuff. But you know, you're way out of normal (don't mean that in a bad way). Makes me wonder who you are and what you do.
If you were in Academia, I suppose you'd like Math. It has it's own language, axioms and logic formally defined and is independent of the world. Timeless and exact. Black and white.
Here we go with the Tard-Bot....
How has your second child been without any vaccines. Normal?
"How has your second child been without any vaccines. Normal?"
Nor mál?
For 1000s of years was it normal to poison your child every few weeks?
History it.