It is official that all processed foods contain an FDA allowed amount of rat feces, insect parts etc... my theory is its fine for healthy people but the minute you get sick and eat that food you will become infected and if you are sick enough, it will become endemic unless treated.
Suddenly aren't. Group of kidney specialists made a TEM images of dead kidney cells 100% free of any SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Among the different objects they got the virus-size spiked particles which was posed as SARS-CoV-2 particles by coronahoaxers.
Fortunately, coronahoaxers miss that paper due to narrow specific of that peer-rewieved journal they don't mind to take over and now we have a solid scientific proof that well-known TEM images posed as ones of SARS-CoV-2 particles among monkey kidney cells remains are not an images of SARS-CoV-2. This virus-size spiked particles are part of usual remains of dead kidney cells.
"like to issue a note of caution for inferring viral tissue infection by morphology alone using electron microscopy images from tissues obtained from biopsies or autopsy material in patients with COVID-19."
Makes perfect sense. We can't use imaging techniques (alone) to identify a virus, we have to use all the tools available (sequencing, antibody mapping, proteomics, RNA-RNA direct mapping, etc, etc, etc)
What the are writing is the obvious two facts:
Other damage to (here kidney, but applies to other) cells can produce similar results as SARS-CoV-2 damage is claimed to produce. -> do not use histological analysis ALONE to infer SARS-CoV-2 damage
Identification of SARS-CoV-2 alone based on imaging (even if TEM) is not feasible, due to imaging resolution limits and similarity of structures. -> do not use TEM/FI-SEM/Cryo-EM/Cryo-TM alone to identify SARS-Cov-2 infection (well nobody would, that would be just stupid).
But to say "there is NO TEM image of SARS-CoV-2" is NOT right. We have plenty of images, we just can't ever get to 100% indentification due to imaging techniques alone.
This is why the Kaufman & Co argument that "show me the proof of SARS-CoV-2 by producing a photo of it" is just stupid.
But to say "there is NO TEM image of SARS-CoV-2" is NOT right.
It's easy.
Somebody made a TEM of kidney cells remains probably infected by SARS-CoV-2 and state that spiked object is a virus of question.
Another team made a TEM of kidney cells remains definitely not infected by SARS-CoV-2 and get the same spiked objects.
Since you have the same result (spiked objects) with different state of input variable (have virus / no virus) the result is not caused by variable.
Spiked objects in TEM of dead kidney cells is obviously not a SARS-CoV-2 virus particles.
In the past, when medicine at least tried to look like science, TEM proof of virus existence easily was made by first isolating it (really isolating, by separating virus particles from everything else, not "isolating" in modern cheaters newspeak), then, making TEM image of that isolated particles. You could easily find such images of purified samples even in pedowikia, say, for poliovirus Here you could easily see that there are a lot of identical objects and since there is nothing except poliovirus in sample you could scientifically assume that this is an TEM image of virus in question. Also this TEM image prove that isolation was successfull and there are no any other particles in sample. This isolated sample could be used for further research of virus, say to obtain the proof that virus and only that virus cause specific disease, or to sequence that virus and only that virus DNA/RNA.
Since SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, there could not be any TEM images that is definitely show us SARS-CoV-2 particles. Also that means that there are can't be any proofs that SARS-CoV-2 cause COVID-19 or that published virtual RNA sequence is sequence of SARS-CoV-2. With all consequences.
As for some Kaufman & Co clowns statements, they have the same validity as statements from identical clowns from WHO or CDC and have nothing common with real science.
Non of that papers show real isolation of SARS-CoV-2. They show studying of some dirty soup made from remains of dead cells, where presence of SARS-CoV-2 assumed only by PCR "test", which is not a test at all, but a manufacturing technology.
In every area of science isolation means separation of object of interest from everything else. In every area of science. From nuclear physics, where scientists build enormous devices just to separate the object of research from any interference to the rheology or even computer science.
If you don't want to really isolate a virus, and even try to pose a dirty soup of endless organic and inorganic substances as "isolate" and continiously try to push the lie that it is real meaning of word isolation - it is not a science at all. It is named fraud.
Now I understand. You have drank the Kaufman koolaid.
And you think there is some sort of live-viewing super-microscope (that doesn't exist) and a nano-sized arm that can take out a single SARS-Cov-2 virus and then put it in a clean non-vero cell culture, culture it, inject it into healthy humans (no ethics boards will ever allow that), let them die and do a histopathology of findings.
This is exactly the stupidity of Kaufman's requirements. They are not real world. They are not possible.
Nobody will ever be able to do it.
That's why it is a total ruse to begin with.
Your and kaufman criteria for isolation is impossible and stupid.
And you think there is some sort of live-viewing super-microscope (that doesn't exist) and a nano-sized arm that can take out a single SARS-Cov-2 virus and then put it in a clean non-vero cell culture,
Where did I said that? So, you think out something I never stated, and lying now attributing that nonsence to me. OK. I didn't expect anything else from you.
You could easily find out the methods of real virus isolation in numerous papers. If you are not aware of that papers. you are dumb. If you aware, you are intentionally lying.
50 years ago there was no any problems in isolation and purification of influenza virus samples. But in 2020 suddenly, just at the time of coronahoax, medics completely forgot how to do things they do over 50 years without any problem.
So, you could continue to lie, but that would not make your "isolation" valid. This only make you fucking liar.
Your and kaufman criteria for isolation is impossible and stupid.
Regardless of who am I, and who kaufman is, isolation in science means "separation of object of interest from everything else". Every single scientist think so. Every scientist want to get pure sample of object they study. Get only neutrinos to prove that they and only they cause some effect, Get pure newly synthesized substance to study it's properties. Get pure sample of million year old ice to study the real wheather of the past. Get signal free from any noise to study some space object. Etc. You will never find a scientist who don't try hard to get object of study as pure as possible. And you definitely will not find a scientist who will lie that "we don't want to really isolate smth. to study it"
Ones, who think other way is not a scientists at all. They are fucking frauds.
No, you have defined your own way of "how isolation" should be done.
The rest of the people doing actual virology in 2020 actually disagree.
Here's an idea.
You think it is so easy:
buy up some lab time
isolate SARS-CoV-2
culture it
inject it into test animals
watch animals die and get sick
do a full autopsy on the animals
isolate the virus from the animals
compare it to the original isolate
Koch's postulates proven , bingo! Then you'll be happy.
Because you won't believe it otherwise, even though it has (mostly) already been done (already linked to the full paper above, which you didn't even fucking bother reading, so why the fucks should I waste my time feeding you info?).
Nobody will do it for you using your arbitrarily chosen criteria . You need to do it yourself. Science owes you shit.
I'm happy enough with the current results as they stand. Hell, I personally talk to an actual experimental scientist who types the full genome sars-cov-2 viruses using non-PCR methods.
He has 20+ years of experience doing that and all forms of DNA/RNA analysis in an actual lab, his hands dirty, unlike Kaufman, who doesn't even know what NGS is.
I take his word over "isolated" samples over Kaufman's.
No, you have defined your own way of "how isolation" should be done.
You are lying. It's not my own way. It is a way isolation defined by any scientist and engineer. Every electric thing you have, from toster to smarphone have an isolation to isolate electric currents from each other. Your building isolate you from outside wheather and pipes isolate water from flooding your home. Roof with holes, leaky pipes and soup from dead monkey cells is not an isolation. You know it, but still continue to lie.
The rest of the people doing actual virology in 2020 actually disagree.
Very nice details. :) "people doing virology in 2020" invented new definition of the term "isolation" that will fit their intentions. Do you understand that your mindless propaganda just show your intentional shillng to coronahoaxers?
Nobody will do it for you using your arbitrarily chosen criteria
You are lying. It is not my criteria. It is the meaning of term "isolation" in any real science. If your "science" suddenly invent and push another meaning of well-defined term, exactly at the time of fraud, that means that your "science" is fraud.
He has 20+ years of experience doing that and all forms of DNA/RNA analysis in an actual lab
You bring your silly "reference to unnamed authoity" propaganda method to the wrong place. This is not a Facebook or Twitter sewage pit where it works.
You are free to believe what you want.
Science is not about belief. It is about proof. And you can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 exists without isolated sample. You can't prove your tests detects it without isolated sample. You can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 is an only reason of COVID-19 ilness without pure isolated sample of that virus. You failed with science at the very beginning. The only thing you have is blind belief to all that frauds.
You could repeat your lie about "special meaning of the term isolation for 2020 virologists" endlessly, but that cost absolutely nothing here.
I literally stuck my dick in crazy and it hasn't fallen off, yet.
I think there is something in the avocados that turns people absurdly liberal.
Awesome post!
It is official that all processed foods contain an FDA allowed amount of rat feces, insect parts etc... my theory is its fine for healthy people but the minute you get sick and eat that food you will become infected and if you are sick enough, it will become endemic unless treated.
Dude this information isn't new or even hidden: https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/04/health/insect-rodent-filth-in-food-wellness/index.html and if you really want to know the full extent of it, read this very carefully: https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredients-additives-gras-packaging-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/food-defect-levels-handbook
You can't take a photo of a virus that is 80-120nm in size.
Diffraction limit foe optical microscopes is at 180nm.
There are TEM images of SARS-CoV-2.
Cowan and Kaufman are either purposefully talking out of their asses or are just clueless on imaging methods.
Either way, it does no good to the other parts of their arguments.
Suddenly aren't. Group of kidney specialists made a TEM images of dead kidney cells 100% free of any SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Among the different objects they got the virus-size spiked particles which was posed as SARS-CoV-2 particles by coronahoaxers.
Here is the paper with TEM images - https://kidney360.asnjournals.org/content/1/8/824
Fortunately, coronahoaxers miss that paper due to narrow specific of that peer-rewieved journal they don't mind to take over and now we have a solid scientific proof that well-known TEM images posed as ones of SARS-CoV-2 particles among monkey kidney cells remains are not an images of SARS-CoV-2. This virus-size spiked particles are part of usual remains of dead kidney cells.
Did you read the paper?
Makes perfect sense. We can't use imaging techniques (alone) to identify a virus, we have to use all the tools available (sequencing, antibody mapping, proteomics, RNA-RNA direct mapping, etc, etc, etc)
What the are writing is the obvious two facts:
Other damage to (here kidney, but applies to other) cells can produce similar results as SARS-CoV-2 damage is claimed to produce. -> do not use histological analysis ALONE to infer SARS-CoV-2 damage
Identification of SARS-CoV-2 alone based on imaging (even if TEM) is not feasible, due to imaging resolution limits and similarity of structures. -> do not use TEM/FI-SEM/Cryo-EM/Cryo-TM alone to identify SARS-Cov-2 infection (well nobody would, that would be just stupid).
But to say "there is NO TEM image of SARS-CoV-2" is NOT right. We have plenty of images, we just can't ever get to 100% indentification due to imaging techniques alone.
This is why the Kaufman & Co argument that "show me the proof of SARS-CoV-2 by producing a photo of it" is just stupid.
It's easy.
Somebody made a TEM of kidney cells remains probably infected by SARS-CoV-2 and state that spiked object is a virus of question.
Another team made a TEM of kidney cells remains definitely not infected by SARS-CoV-2 and get the same spiked objects.
Since you have the same result (spiked objects) with different state of input variable (have virus / no virus) the result is not caused by variable.
Spiked objects in TEM of dead kidney cells is obviously not a SARS-CoV-2 virus particles.
In the past, when medicine at least tried to look like science, TEM proof of virus existence easily was made by first isolating it (really isolating, by separating virus particles from everything else, not "isolating" in modern cheaters newspeak), then, making TEM image of that isolated particles. You could easily find such images of purified samples even in pedowikia, say, for poliovirus Here you could easily see that there are a lot of identical objects and since there is nothing except poliovirus in sample you could scientifically assume that this is an TEM image of virus in question. Also this TEM image prove that isolation was successfull and there are no any other particles in sample. This isolated sample could be used for further research of virus, say to obtain the proof that virus and only that virus cause specific disease, or to sequence that virus and only that virus DNA/RNA.
Since SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, there could not be any TEM images that is definitely show us SARS-CoV-2 particles. Also that means that there are can't be any proofs that SARS-CoV-2 cause COVID-19 or that published virtual RNA sequence is sequence of SARS-CoV-2. With all consequences.
As for some Kaufman & Co clowns statements, they have the same validity as statements from identical clowns from WHO or CDC and have nothing common with real science.
Please see the references on this post:
https://conspiracies.win/p/12jwVkQRlt/x/c/4JEVhGBeJTp
Non of that papers show real isolation of SARS-CoV-2. They show studying of some dirty soup made from remains of dead cells, where presence of SARS-CoV-2 assumed only by PCR "test", which is not a test at all, but a manufacturing technology.
In every area of science isolation means separation of object of interest from everything else. In every area of science. From nuclear physics, where scientists build enormous devices just to separate the object of research from any interference to the rheology or even computer science.
If you don't want to really isolate a virus, and even try to pose a dirty soup of endless organic and inorganic substances as "isolate" and continiously try to push the lie that it is real meaning of word isolation - it is not a science at all. It is named fraud.
Now I understand. You have drank the Kaufman koolaid.
And you think there is some sort of live-viewing super-microscope (that doesn't exist) and a nano-sized arm that can take out a single SARS-Cov-2 virus and then put it in a clean non-vero cell culture, culture it, inject it into healthy humans (no ethics boards will ever allow that), let them die and do a histopathology of findings.
This is exactly the stupidity of Kaufman's requirements. They are not real world. They are not possible.
Nobody will ever be able to do it.
That's why it is a total ruse to begin with.
Your and kaufman criteria for isolation is impossible and stupid.
Where did I said that? So, you think out something I never stated, and lying now attributing that nonsence to me. OK. I didn't expect anything else from you.
You could easily find out the methods of real virus isolation in numerous papers. If you are not aware of that papers. you are dumb. If you aware, you are intentionally lying.
Here is something to start, if you are not aware: https://sci-hub.tf/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90103-4 https://sci-hub.tf/10.1007/BF01241916
50 years ago there was no any problems in isolation and purification of influenza virus samples. But in 2020 suddenly, just at the time of coronahoax, medics completely forgot how to do things they do over 50 years without any problem.
So, you could continue to lie, but that would not make your "isolation" valid. This only make you fucking liar.
Regardless of who am I, and who kaufman is, isolation in science means "separation of object of interest from everything else". Every single scientist think so. Every scientist want to get pure sample of object they study. Get only neutrinos to prove that they and only they cause some effect, Get pure newly synthesized substance to study it's properties. Get pure sample of million year old ice to study the real wheather of the past. Get signal free from any noise to study some space object. Etc. You will never find a scientist who don't try hard to get object of study as pure as possible. And you definitely will not find a scientist who will lie that "we don't want to really isolate smth. to study it"
Ones, who think other way is not a scientists at all. They are fucking frauds.
No, you have defined your own way of "how isolation" should be done.
The rest of the people doing actual virology in 2020 actually disagree.
Here's an idea.
You think it is so easy:
Koch's postulates proven , bingo! Then you'll be happy.
Because you won't believe it otherwise, even though it has (mostly) already been done (already linked to the full paper above, which you didn't even fucking bother reading, so why the fucks should I waste my time feeding you info?).
Nobody will do it for you using your arbitrarily chosen criteria . You need to do it yourself. Science owes you shit.
I'm happy enough with the current results as they stand. Hell, I personally talk to an actual experimental scientist who types the full genome sars-cov-2 viruses using non-PCR methods.
He has 20+ years of experience doing that and all forms of DNA/RNA analysis in an actual lab, his hands dirty, unlike Kaufman, who doesn't even know what NGS is.
I take his word over "isolated" samples over Kaufman's.
You are free to believe what you want.
You are lying. It's not my own way. It is a way isolation defined by any scientist and engineer. Every electric thing you have, from toster to smarphone have an isolation to isolate electric currents from each other. Your building isolate you from outside wheather and pipes isolate water from flooding your home. Roof with holes, leaky pipes and soup from dead monkey cells is not an isolation. You know it, but still continue to lie.
Very nice details. :) "people doing virology in 2020" invented new definition of the term "isolation" that will fit their intentions. Do you understand that your mindless propaganda just show your intentional shillng to coronahoaxers?
You are lying. It is not my criteria. It is the meaning of term "isolation" in any real science. If your "science" suddenly invent and push another meaning of well-defined term, exactly at the time of fraud, that means that your "science" is fraud.
You bring your silly "reference to unnamed authoity" propaganda method to the wrong place. This is not a Facebook or Twitter sewage pit where it works.
Science is not about belief. It is about proof. And you can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 exists without isolated sample. You can't prove your tests detects it without isolated sample. You can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 is an only reason of COVID-19 ilness without pure isolated sample of that virus. You failed with science at the very beginning. The only thing you have is blind belief to all that frauds.
You could repeat your lie about "special meaning of the term isolation for 2020 virologists" endlessly, but that cost absolutely nothing here.
Agreed, the fact they don't mention Zinc and seem to be more interested in rambling then making their point is another red flag.