No, you have defined your own way of "how isolation" should be done.
You are lying. It's not my own way. It is a way isolation defined by any scientist and engineer. Every electric thing you have, from toster to smarphone have an isolation to isolate electric currents from each other. Your building isolate you from outside wheather and pipes isolate water from flooding your home. Roof with holes, leaky pipes and soup from dead monkey cells is not an isolation. You know it, but still continue to lie.
The rest of the people doing actual virology in 2020 actually disagree.
Very nice details. :) "people doing virology in 2020" invented new definition of the term "isolation" that will fit their intentions. Do you understand that your mindless propaganda just show your intentional shillng to coronahoaxers?
Nobody will do it for you using your arbitrarily chosen criteria
You are lying. It is not my criteria. It is the meaning of term "isolation" in any real science. If your "science" suddenly invent and push another meaning of well-defined term, exactly at the time of fraud, that means that your "science" is fraud.
He has 20+ years of experience doing that and all forms of DNA/RNA analysis in an actual lab
You bring your silly "reference to unnamed authoity" propaganda method to the wrong place. This is not a Facebook or Twitter sewage pit where it works.
You are free to believe what you want.
Science is not about belief. It is about proof. And you can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 exists without isolated sample. You can't prove your tests detects it without isolated sample. You can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 is an only reason of COVID-19 ilness without pure isolated sample of that virus. You failed with science at the very beginning. The only thing you have is blind belief to all that frauds.
You could repeat your lie about "special meaning of the term isolation for 2020 virologists" endlessly, but that cost absolutely nothing here.
Actually through experimentation, hypothesis formation, data gathering, theory making and finally falsification, but yeah, I agree. In the end, there is no proof, just unfalsified theories that have stood the test of time (so far).
I gave you 17 peer-reviewed, experimental results.
You gave me your opinion, no references, no experimental results, nothing else. Just your definition of "isolation"; which the rest of the people doing isolation in biology actually disagree on.
What experimental results you need to understand that the well-defined scientific term "isolation" is not about dancing around the dirty soup from dead monkey kidney cells remains, antibiotics, fungicides and hell knows what else?
Do you ever read or write any scientific papers aside from that medical madness? Do you ever conduct any scientific research to find the cause of some effect or malfunction? If you do, you will never name that crap from your "17 peer-reviewed papers" as "isolation". Ever.
You are lying. It's not my own way. It is a way isolation defined by any scientist and engineer. Every electric thing you have, from toster to smarphone have an isolation to isolate electric currents from each other. Your building isolate you from outside wheather and pipes isolate water from flooding your home. Roof with holes, leaky pipes and soup from dead monkey cells is not an isolation. You know it, but still continue to lie.
Very nice details. :) "people doing virology in 2020" invented new definition of the term "isolation" that will fit their intentions. Do you understand that your mindless propaganda just show your intentional shillng to coronahoaxers?
You are lying. It is not my criteria. It is the meaning of term "isolation" in any real science. If your "science" suddenly invent and push another meaning of well-defined term, exactly at the time of fraud, that means that your "science" is fraud.
You bring your silly "reference to unnamed authoity" propaganda method to the wrong place. This is not a Facebook or Twitter sewage pit where it works.
Science is not about belief. It is about proof. And you can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 exists without isolated sample. You can't prove your tests detects it without isolated sample. You can't prove that SARS-CoV-2 is an only reason of COVID-19 ilness without pure isolated sample of that virus. You failed with science at the very beginning. The only thing you have is blind belief to all that frauds.
You could repeat your lie about "special meaning of the term isolation for 2020 virologists" endlessly, but that cost absolutely nothing here.
Actually through experimentation, hypothesis formation, data gathering, theory making and finally falsification, but yeah, I agree. In the end, there is no proof, just unfalsified theories that have stood the test of time (so far).
I gave you 17 peer-reviewed, experimental results.
You gave me your opinion, no references, no experimental results, nothing else. Just your definition of "isolation"; which the rest of the people doing isolation in biology actually disagree on.
I'll leave it that.
What experimental results you need to understand that the well-defined scientific term "isolation" is not about dancing around the dirty soup from dead monkey kidney cells remains, antibiotics, fungicides and hell knows what else?
Do you ever read or write any scientific papers aside from that medical madness? Do you ever conduct any scientific research to find the cause of some effect or malfunction? If you do, you will never name that crap from your "17 peer-reviewed papers" as "isolation". Ever.
So, I'll leave it too.