Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
posted 4 years ago by funturistic 4 years ago by funturistic +11 / -0
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

There are TEM images of SARS-CoV-2.

Suddenly aren't. Group of kidney specialists made a TEM images of dead kidney cells 100% free of any SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Among the different objects they got the virus-size spiked particles which was posed as SARS-CoV-2 particles by coronahoaxers.

Here is the paper with TEM images - https://kidney360.asnjournals.org/content/1/8/824

Fortunately, coronahoaxers miss that paper due to narrow specific of that peer-rewieved journal they don't mind to take over and now we have a solid scientific proof that well-known TEM images posed as ones of SARS-CoV-2 particles among monkey kidney cells remains are not an images of SARS-CoV-2. This virus-size spiked particles are part of usual remains of dead kidney cells.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

But to say "there is NO TEM image of SARS-CoV-2" is NOT right.

It's easy.

  1. Somebody made a TEM of kidney cells remains probably infected by SARS-CoV-2 and state that spiked object is a virus of question.

  2. Another team made a TEM of kidney cells remains definitely not infected by SARS-CoV-2 and get the same spiked objects.

  3. Since you have the same result (spiked objects) with different state of input variable (have virus / no virus) the result is not caused by variable.

  4. Spiked objects in TEM of dead kidney cells is obviously not a SARS-CoV-2 virus particles.

In the past, when medicine at least tried to look like science, TEM proof of virus existence easily was made by first isolating it (really isolating, by separating virus particles from everything else, not "isolating" in modern cheaters newspeak), then, making TEM image of that isolated particles. You could easily find such images of purified samples even in pedowikia, say, for poliovirus Here you could easily see that there are a lot of identical objects and since there is nothing except poliovirus in sample you could scientifically assume that this is an TEM image of virus in question. Also this TEM image prove that isolation was successfull and there are no any other particles in sample. This isolated sample could be used for further research of virus, say to obtain the proof that virus and only that virus cause specific disease, or to sequence that virus and only that virus DNA/RNA.

Since SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, there could not be any TEM images that is definitely show us SARS-CoV-2 particles. Also that means that there are can't be any proofs that SARS-CoV-2 cause COVID-19 or that published virtual RNA sequence is sequence of SARS-CoV-2. With all consequences.

As for some Kaufman & Co clowns statements, they have the same validity as statements from identical clowns from WHO or CDC and have nothing common with real science.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Non of that papers show real isolation of SARS-CoV-2. They show studying of some dirty soup made from remains of dead cells, where presence of SARS-CoV-2 assumed only by PCR "test", which is not a test at all, but a manufacturing technology.

In every area of science isolation means separation of object of interest from everything else. In every area of science. From nuclear physics, where scientists build enormous devices just to separate the object of research from any interference to the rheology or even computer science.

If you don't want to really isolate a virus, and even try to pose a dirty soup of endless organic and inorganic substances as "isolate" and continiously try to push the lie that it is real meaning of word isolation - it is not a science at all. It is named fraud.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– TheShitWhisperer 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Agreed, the fact they don't mention Zinc and seem to be more interested in rambling then making their point is another red flag.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy