She is weighing ONE complication from vacine (with only preliminary statistics) against ALL possible risks from the disease.
Also, she is comparing healthy population risk (myocarditis) vs sick population (only sick, fat, obese and metabolically broken young people die from COVID-19), which is completely ass-backwards and shit-for-brains epidemiology.
Deliberate and fucking obvious. Nobody who knows anything about epidemiology or medical risk/benefit analysis would do these mistakes accidentally.
She is a sell-out.
Add her to the list of Nuremberg 2.0 trial accused.
That’s some fuzzy math.
Distorted statistics.
She is weighing ONE complication from vacine (with only preliminary statistics) against ALL possible risks from the disease.
Also, she is comparing healthy population risk (myocarditis) vs sick population (only sick, fat, obese and metabolically broken young people die from COVID-19), which is completely ass-backwards and shit-for-brains epidemiology.
Deliberate and fucking obvious. Nobody who knows anything about epidemiology or medical risk/benefit analysis would do these mistakes accidentally.
She is a sell-out.
Add her to the list of Nuremberg 2.0 trial accused.
No matter what the data actually shows,
The vaccine quacks will interpret the data to say its worth it.
These are the same people who buy lottery tickets and rationalize it by saying someone has to win.
And that death will be an 85 year old with a whole host of comorbidities and weeks from dieing.
But those 40 kids will enjoy 50 more years each of heart problems.
So ... a few months cut short vs. 50x40=2,000 years of heart issues for those 40 kids.
"Rochelle WalenSKY" need we spell it more?
no need for Early Life Gang to even look into this one