A false dichotomy is a talking point for all liars. But that is not what I was implying. My assertion is that, the vaccinated are no longer considered people under the corporate city state, controlled by the Holy See, and that, they are the bases of their new financial order. UBI, global crypto, vaccine passports, depopulation. The vaccinated are now assets of the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
(Until they are not, because that too was fraud, and can always be undone through documentation and Ivermectin treatments at a later date.)
Wouldn't that give the parents the sole authority over the child until age of consent is reached (which the pedo agendas intent to lower)?
when born and without our consent
The parents give consent by branding the child with the corporate name, and they then use suggestion to deceive the child to consent to it by believing the name; which tricks the child to act in the name of a corporate identity owned by others. Meanwhile; the nine months since inception become unclaimed goods; ready to be claimed; harvested (abortion).
will be done when were adults and we give consent.
And how would that be different from the usual suggestions used to deceive us to consent to want over need? "Want convenience; goys? - Yeah; gibs me dats dependency!"
Where's the "new" system? Are they trying to claim the flowing blood (the self) by injecting false authority into it? Such an annoying circumstance to live in...
Yes. But like the first system that tricked mothers into signing away their rights to their children, the vaccine passports are also based in deception and fraud.
So I ask, was consent actually provided then? Or was consent simply assumed through deception? Is there really any difference this time?
The old one was supposedly ended by the actual country of the united states, so they would have need for a new one to perpetuate their financial system.
So were our names (corporate identities) unclaimed for a while? Wouldn't that require destruction of the bonds on their side and the certificates on ours? Then again...laws of men equals organized crime anyway.
"free" will of choice for form under the "dom"inance of flow. That's the system that sets us and they adhere to it; while suggesting the inversion of it to us. They suggest themselves as the dominance over us; while restricting our choices to the liberties they offer, all while corrupting us from comprehending the natural law underneath their suggestions.
no longer owned
The term itself represents a suggested inversion...OWN (belonging in exclusion of others); which ignores us being ONE (form) within ALL (flow); which implies ALL being ONE in energy. We represent segregation (potential) within coexistence (potentiality); not exclusion from another. ONE cannot own any other ONE; "only" use ALL offered for the sustenance of self.
Of course, they simply would ignore this, as their entire system is based on fraud.
The few controlling the many represents a balance of odds...force cannot be used by the few upon the many for long without action causing reaction, which would put the few at unfavorable odds against the many.
Control by force had to evolve into control by suggestion, which aims at deceiving the many to consent to be ruled by the force wielding few. So suggestion (primary) and force (secondary) to balance action and reaction among the many.
Our consent represents ignorance; which results in our lack of comprehension about this system, and our comprehension represents ONEs potential within ALL potentiality. That's the growth potential (form) the few try to corrupt through suggestion; while directing it towards the loss of potentiality that flow represents. Suggestion as the pied piper to lure the ignorance of the many into the drain.
Fraud aka deception; falsified; false ignores that flow does not offer "false" information to form; it is our consent to suggested "true" information (by other form) that a) gives them the power over it; b) causes the conflict of reason (true vs false) among us and c) subsequently allows them to contradict our true with a suggested false to keep the deception going.
Neither true nor false are states within flow; which simply moves form; which our senses perceive as inspiration...not defined (true/false) information. We are the ones the "want" to brand everything, which tricks us to ignore the ongoing movement of it and the resulting change. Change is what inspires form to struggle for self sustenance within flow. Watching things die gets the noggin jogging towards upholding our lives...unless ignored or watched for entertainment (look at my killstreak, dude).
This is my theory. He is stating his intentions openly. As in their warped minds, this amounts to disclosure on their part, and consent on the part of the people. They then absolve themselves of responsibly, for any misinterpretations by those who trusted them.
He is claiming there to be two nations. One comprised of GMO humans owned by the Holy See, and the Nation of the united states, that he views as their enemy.
They will use the American's as debt slaves, and place bonds on the vaccinated to be culled.
Just because what you perceive as "half the world" escaping from the Corona False Flag Catastrophe (Actually only the US and probably the UK and it's just because 1/3rds of the former are Vaxxed and Hancock fucked up in the latter) doesn't mean that the crisis is over.
"Two Americas" is a long-time leftist talking point.
A false dichotomy is a talking point for all liars. But that is not what I was implying. My assertion is that, the vaccinated are no longer considered people under the corporate city state, controlled by the Holy See, and that, they are the bases of their new financial order. UBI, global crypto, vaccine passports, depopulation. The vaccinated are now assets of the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
(Until they are not, because that too was fraud, and can always be undone through documentation and Ivermectin treatments at a later date.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Americas
Thank you for elaborating. I don't think you are correct, though.
As with the birth certificate system, they would be presumed dead, so that the banking system can exploit them as they see fit.
What's the difference between the old "in the name of" (corporate identity) and the new mark of approval? Just access to liberties?
Wouldn't that give the parents the sole authority over the child until age of consent is reached (which the pedo agendas intent to lower)?
The parents give consent by branding the child with the corporate name, and they then use suggestion to deceive the child to consent to it by believing the name; which tricks the child to act in the name of a corporate identity owned by others. Meanwhile; the nine months since inception become unclaimed goods; ready to be claimed; harvested (abortion).
And how would that be different from the usual suggestions used to deceive us to consent to want over need? "Want convenience; goys? - Yeah; gibs me dats dependency!"
Where's the "new" system? Are they trying to claim the flowing blood (the self) by injecting false authority into it? Such an annoying circumstance to live in...
Yes. But like the first system that tricked mothers into signing away their rights to their children, the vaccine passports are also based in deception and fraud.
So I ask, was consent actually provided then? Or was consent simply assumed through deception? Is there really any difference this time?
The old one was supposedly ended by the actual country of the united states, so they would have need for a new one to perpetuate their financial system.
So were our names (corporate identities) unclaimed for a while? Wouldn't that require destruction of the bonds on their side and the certificates on ours? Then again...laws of men equals organized crime anyway.
It meant that we were free of the system, and no longer owned. Of course, they simply would ignore this, as their entire system is based on fraud.
"free" will of choice for form under the "dom"inance of flow. That's the system that sets us and they adhere to it; while suggesting the inversion of it to us. They suggest themselves as the dominance over us; while restricting our choices to the liberties they offer, all while corrupting us from comprehending the natural law underneath their suggestions.
The term itself represents a suggested inversion...OWN (belonging in exclusion of others); which ignores us being ONE (form) within ALL (flow); which implies ALL being ONE in energy. We represent segregation (potential) within coexistence (potentiality); not exclusion from another. ONE cannot own any other ONE; "only" use ALL offered for the sustenance of self.
The few controlling the many represents a balance of odds...force cannot be used by the few upon the many for long without action causing reaction, which would put the few at unfavorable odds against the many.
Control by force had to evolve into control by suggestion, which aims at deceiving the many to consent to be ruled by the force wielding few. So suggestion (primary) and force (secondary) to balance action and reaction among the many.
Our consent represents ignorance; which results in our lack of comprehension about this system, and our comprehension represents ONEs potential within ALL potentiality. That's the growth potential (form) the few try to corrupt through suggestion; while directing it towards the loss of potentiality that flow represents. Suggestion as the pied piper to lure the ignorance of the many into the drain.
Fraud aka deception; falsified; false ignores that flow does not offer "false" information to form; it is our consent to suggested "true" information (by other form) that a) gives them the power over it; b) causes the conflict of reason (true vs false) among us and c) subsequently allows them to contradict our true with a suggested false to keep the deception going.
Neither true nor false are states within flow; which simply moves form; which our senses perceive as inspiration...not defined (true/false) information. We are the ones the "want" to brand everything, which tricks us to ignore the ongoing movement of it and the resulting change. Change is what inspires form to struggle for self sustenance within flow. Watching things die gets the noggin jogging towards upholding our lives...unless ignored or watched for entertainment (look at my killstreak, dude).
Sometimes. Engage him with questions. He is very helpful in explaining what he is trying to communicate. L2.
Brief overview on the Birth certificate system, and the difference between the united states the country vs the corporation can be found here:
War Castles - Military Insider :Robert-Leroy
Death by stoning.
And the rest somehow didn't????
Is he admitting the intended outcome?
This is my theory. He is stating his intentions openly. As in their warped minds, this amounts to disclosure on their part, and consent on the part of the people. They then absolve themselves of responsibly, for any misinterpretations by those who trusted them.
He is claiming there to be two nations. One comprised of GMO humans owned by the Holy See, and the Nation of the united states, that he views as their enemy.
They will use the American's as debt slaves, and place bonds on the vaccinated to be culled.