The Dems believed their own polls that Trump was unpopular and bound to lose, they didn't ramp up their cheating machine (which, despite digital machines, is mostly ballot box stuffing, old school).
They stopped counting in 2016 in the middle of the night as well, but after hours of delay looking for votes, it was to late, they didn't have hundreds of thousands of pre-printed ballots. They had to call it for Trump.
If I were Trump, I'd be finding rural County Clerks and they'd stuff the ballot box to counteract the inner city ballot box stuffing. That's how downstate IL had to resort to counteract Chicago, back in the 1960s.
Yes. Why else would they spend 4 years trying to destroy him with non stop negative media coverage and constant investigations into insane bullshit. Only for the next president to immediately undo everything Trump did.
You’re right, that did all happen! But your examples had proof. Y’know, evidence?
The elections have been audited. They’ve been audited again. In one state, we’re on a third audit — because we just can’t find proof of that darn voter fraud that is supposedly so clear. All we seem to be able to garner is some handwritten affidavits, typo-ridden lawsuits, and half-baked conspiracy theories about bamboo, UV ink, and Chyna.
to which they have since been demonstrated to have been wrong
Wanna show me another audit that said the first audit is wrong? Or is this the typical case where you just drop the “here’s the evidence” link and run.
That site legitimately considers a handwritten affidavit about being called a “Karen” while in line to vote as evidence of voter fraud, by the way.
They were given a two year warning for it to end. They ignored that warning.
https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2020/11/28/trumps-executive-order-on-foreign-election-interference-has-serious-penalties/
He should have signed it instead of bitching out
Which? The activation of the insurrection act, or that executive order? Because he did. On both counts.
And thats when they quickly shut down the Jill Green recount effort .
Virgin Overcounting ballots vs Chad beating up voters who don't fall in line.
Too many fucking votes across the United States! You'd have to be a moron to believe this election was legitimate.
Biden is not our president.
I don't believe they are entirely fraudulent. The last one yes, but somehow Trump got elected.
The Dems believed their own polls that Trump was unpopular and bound to lose, they didn't ramp up their cheating machine (which, despite digital machines, is mostly ballot box stuffing, old school).
They stopped counting in 2016 in the middle of the night as well, but after hours of delay looking for votes, it was to late, they didn't have hundreds of thousands of pre-printed ballots. They had to call it for Trump.
If I were Trump, I'd be finding rural County Clerks and they'd stuff the ballot box to counteract the inner city ballot box stuffing. That's how downstate IL had to resort to counteract Chicago, back in the 1960s.
https://vdare.com/posts/jfk-mayor-daley-and-the-joy-of-counting-your-votes-last
Yes. Why else would they spend 4 years trying to destroy him with non stop negative media coverage and constant investigations into insane bullshit. Only for the next president to immediately undo everything Trump did.
The source your citing reported a year later, after an audit, that this wasn’t the result of voter fraud.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/09/state-audit-finds-questionable-votes-detroit/97696820/
You’re right, that did all happen! But your examples had proof. Y’know, evidence?
The elections have been audited. They’ve been audited again. In one state, we’re on a third audit — because we just can’t find proof of that darn voter fraud that is supposedly so clear. All we seem to be able to garner is some handwritten affidavits, typo-ridden lawsuits, and half-baked conspiracy theories about bamboo, UV ink, and Chyna.
I take your implication is that an audit is wrong if it doesn’t find voter fraud?
That’s not the point of an audit my guy.
I'm just glad to see your support for forensic audits, that will shed light on the election.
Wanna show me another audit that said the first audit is wrong? Or is this the typical case where you just drop the “here’s the evidence” link and run.
That site legitimately considers a handwritten affidavit about being called a “Karen” while in line to vote as evidence of voter fraud, by the way.