The recent coup was a very "American" type of coup that didn't involve violence, but only the threat of violence.
Once a coup happens, the means of communication are always seized to prevent the opposition from having a voice, but in America, Big Tech already had done that prior to the Biden coup. In the run up to the election, they convinced many people that it would take weeks to know the real winner, which gave the left time to ballot box stuff until Biden came out on top.
The next thing dictators do is disarm their opposition. However, guns are the only thing conservatives have won on the culture war in the past 50 years, because they really CARE about their guns. The left won't touch it but to nibble on the margins.
So applying historical parallels is difficult. However, dictators always consolidate their power. What the Dems have tried to do is consolidate their power with HR1, to institutionalize their election fraud regiment. However, it looks like that won't happen due to (amazingly enough) a few principled Democrat Girondists who were happy to get rid of Trump but don't want the Jacobins to pull out the guillotines.
Further, since it's hard to rig all 435 House races, and 33 Senate races, they have to deal with mid-term elections in 2022 being somewhat normal in a post covid era where they can't stuff the ballot box for weeks like in 2020. So they won't crash the economy like some think, because if it crashes people naturally blame the party in charge, at this moment it's the Democrats.
that didn't involve violence, but only the threat of violence.
Suggestion of force in exchange for consent by free will of choice to believe in fear of consequences of force. Once consented; fear of harm will cause self harm (stress). That's all part of control through suggestion.
Well, yes. Terrorism is defined as obtaining political policies through force or threat of force. I'm convinced the Courts didn't touch the fraud cases because of fear of violence.
Every -ism represents a suggestion (of fiction) in exchange for consent (free will) to ignorance (of reality). -isms represent the main tool for mass control through suggestion.
through force or threat of force
Control by force causes unfavorable odds for the few who want to control the many, because action causes reaction (for form within flow), and so control by force needed to become secondary to control through suggestion, because suggestion aims at consent by free will of choice, so the reaction of the many will be self destructive, since they all consented to what they wanted aka falling for a suggested temptation by the few; who act as the happy merchants of temptation; while using every suggestive means to get the many to consent to ignorance (by free will); to self inflicted corruption of comprehension (beliefs); to self destruction.
The recent coup was a very "American" type of coup that didn't involve violence, but only the threat of violence.
Once a coup happens, the means of communication are always seized to prevent the opposition from having a voice, but in America, Big Tech already had done that prior to the Biden coup. In the run up to the election, they convinced many people that it would take weeks to know the real winner, which gave the left time to ballot box stuff until Biden came out on top.
The next thing dictators do is disarm their opposition. However, guns are the only thing conservatives have won on the culture war in the past 50 years, because they really CARE about their guns. The left won't touch it but to nibble on the margins.
So applying historical parallels is difficult. However, dictators always consolidate their power. What the Dems have tried to do is consolidate their power with HR1, to institutionalize their election fraud regiment. However, it looks like that won't happen due to (amazingly enough) a few principled Democrat Girondists who were happy to get rid of Trump but don't want the Jacobins to pull out the guillotines.
Further, since it's hard to rig all 435 House races, and 33 Senate races, they have to deal with mid-term elections in 2022 being somewhat normal in a post covid era where they can't stuff the ballot box for weeks like in 2020. So they won't crash the economy like some think, because if it crashes people naturally blame the party in charge, at this moment it's the Democrats.
2008 was a black swan event. Big banks and elites were getting filthy rich on the housing boom. They were caught flat-footed as was everyone else. They just made sure the bailouts protected them and the politicians that enabled them, and that nobody saw a prison cell for anything.
If an engineered crash happens, it will be to force a transition to a non-cash economy. I don't think that's likely to happen, because political power is all about a grift...taxing the masses to reward your friends and punish your enemies.
Democrats are more than willing to jigger things or jawbone such as to cause a recession to obtain power, but not do so when they are in power.
DICTATE, verb transitive [Latin, to speak.] - "to tell with authority; to deliver, as an order, command, or direction"
Another parasite inversion in that one...flow "delivers" form (aka motion causing momentum); flow represents the ongoing "order" to the temporary chaos of form within flow; flow "commands" a response from form (aka adaptation), and flow defines "direction" for the form within.
The suggested inversion represents "to speak"; which in return allows other form within flow to act in the name of flow aka false authority through suggested languages...flow doesn't speak; it moves form which represents inspiration for form to sustain itself through adaptation to flow, and that's why form needs the sole authority over self (free will of choice) for balance (momentum) within flow (motion).
I'm sure all those pollsters in 2016 were perfectly neutral. Rasmussen was on closer on target in 2016, if you knew your (recent) history, than most others.
Face it, you can't trust a poll related to Trump, cancel culture goons such as yourself have prompted people to lie through their teeth, but usually in a anti-Trump or pro-leftist direction.
If 51% of people say in a poll that they think voter fraud lead to the recent coup, I suspect the real number that people are willing to admit in the privacy of their living rooms is higher by some amount.
The recent coup was a very "American" type of coup that didn't involve violence, but only the threat of violence.
Once a coup happens, the means of communication are always seized to prevent the opposition from having a voice, but in America, Big Tech already had done that prior to the Biden coup. In the run up to the election, they convinced many people that it would take weeks to know the real winner, which gave the left time to ballot box stuff until Biden came out on top.
The next thing dictators do is disarm their opposition. However, guns are the only thing conservatives have won on the culture war in the past 50 years, because they really CARE about their guns. The left won't touch it but to nibble on the margins.
So applying historical parallels is difficult. However, dictators always consolidate their power. What the Dems have tried to do is consolidate their power with HR1, to institutionalize their election fraud regiment. However, it looks like that won't happen due to (amazingly enough) a few principled Democrat Girondists who were happy to get rid of Trump but don't want the Jacobins to pull out the guillotines.
Further, since it's hard to rig all 435 House races, and 33 Senate races, they have to deal with mid-term elections in 2022 being somewhat normal in a post covid era where they can't stuff the ballot box for weeks like in 2020. So they won't crash the economy like some think, because if it crashes people naturally blame the party in charge, at this moment it's the Democrats.
Suggestion of force in exchange for consent by free will of choice to believe in fear of consequences of force. Once consented; fear of harm will cause self harm (stress). That's all part of control through suggestion.
Well, yes. Terrorism is defined as obtaining political policies through force or threat of force. I'm convinced the Courts didn't touch the fraud cases because of fear of violence.
Every -ism represents a suggestion (of fiction) in exchange for consent (free will) to ignorance (of reality). -isms represent the main tool for mass control through suggestion.
Control by force causes unfavorable odds for the few who want to control the many, because action causes reaction (for form within flow), and so control by force needed to become secondary to control through suggestion, because suggestion aims at consent by free will of choice, so the reaction of the many will be self destructive, since they all consented to what they wanted aka falling for a suggested temptation by the few; who act as the happy merchants of temptation; while using every suggestive means to get the many to consent to ignorance (by free will); to self inflicted corruption of comprehension (beliefs); to self destruction.
The recent coup was a very "American" type of coup that didn't involve violence, but only the threat of violence.
Once a coup happens, the means of communication are always seized to prevent the opposition from having a voice, but in America, Big Tech already had done that prior to the Biden coup. In the run up to the election, they convinced many people that it would take weeks to know the real winner, which gave the left time to ballot box stuff until Biden came out on top.
The next thing dictators do is disarm their opposition. However, guns are the only thing conservatives have won on the culture war in the past 50 years, because they really CARE about their guns. The left won't touch it but to nibble on the margins.
So applying historical parallels is difficult. However, dictators always consolidate their power. What the Dems have tried to do is consolidate their power with HR1, to institutionalize their election fraud regiment. However, it looks like that won't happen due to (amazingly enough) a few principled Democrat Girondists who were happy to get rid of Trump but don't want the Jacobins to pull out the guillotines.
Further, since it's hard to rig all 435 House races, and 33 Senate races, they have to deal with mid-term elections in 2022 being somewhat normal in a post covid era where they can't stuff the ballot box for weeks like in 2020. So they won't crash the economy like some think, because if it crashes people naturally blame the party in charge, at this moment it's the Democrats.
2008 was a black swan event. Big banks and elites were getting filthy rich on the housing boom. They were caught flat-footed as was everyone else. They just made sure the bailouts protected them and the politicians that enabled them, and that nobody saw a prison cell for anything.
If an engineered crash happens, it will be to force a transition to a non-cash economy. I don't think that's likely to happen, because political power is all about a grift...taxing the masses to reward your friends and punish your enemies.
Democrats are more than willing to jigger things or jawbone such as to cause a recession to obtain power, but not do so when they are in power.
DICTATE, verb transitive [Latin, to speak.] - "to tell with authority; to deliver, as an order, command, or direction"
Another parasite inversion in that one...flow "delivers" form (aka motion causing momentum); flow represents the ongoing "order" to the temporary chaos of form within flow; flow "commands" a response from form (aka adaptation), and flow defines "direction" for the form within.
The suggested inversion represents "to speak"; which in return allows other form within flow to act in the name of flow aka false authority through suggested languages...flow doesn't speak; it moves form which represents inspiration for form to sustain itself through adaptation to flow, and that's why form needs the sole authority over self (free will of choice) for balance (momentum) within flow (motion).
Lol, a Rasmussen poll. Might as well ask Trump himself to do the polling at that point.
Did you trust those polls in 2016?
At long last, when will we all realize that polls means shit when Trump is involved.
I’ve never trusted polls, but that doesn’t mean certain pollsters aren’t biased right.
I'm sure all those pollsters in 2016 were perfectly neutral. Rasmussen was on closer on target in 2016, if you knew your (recent) history, than most others.
Face it, you can't trust a poll related to Trump, cancel culture goons such as yourself have prompted people to lie through their teeth, but usually in a anti-Trump or pro-leftist direction.
If 51% of people say in a poll that they think voter fraud lead to the recent coup, I suspect the real number that people are willing to admit in the privacy of their living rooms is higher by some amount.