I know Icke talks about the moon being artificial and there are many "indigenous populations" who have oral traditions about a time when the moon wasn't here.
I've got the book "Who made the moon" and it has some info but is really just saying stuff doesn't make sense and is literally just asking the question.
Anyone got any compilations or links or great info about the moon being hollow, being a space ship, being a manufactured satellite, so on and so forth, something that was brought here and parked in place?
No need to post FE stuff that's easy to find and not what I'm looking for.
They've essentially redefined what constitutes as "earths atmosphere", and the people feeding people this space is fake or moon landing was fake or earth is flat nonsense are counting on you not knowing the distinction.
"The atmosphere" was traditionally defined as what we can see, fact is there are trace elements that are "caught" in earths environment which extends much further than "the thin blue barrier" that sits tight against the planet.
Historical accomplishments haven't changed, the facts haven't changed, the only thing that has changed is the understanding of what constitutes being considered part of a planetary system.
It could be that they have changed the definition for clarity, or it could be that they are slow walking us someplace that they intend to divulge at a later date.
Similarly, a lot of the talking points for the current vaccine seem to only make sense under terrain theory.... And they seem to be changing the definition of words in order to avoid liability, in the hopes that the 'science will change' over time, and that nobody will notice.
Yeah but the livable part hasn't expanded with this "discovery". Perhaps they're reaching with this, to make it seem like it's well easy and fine to travel to the moon cuz it's only in our atmosphere innit.
This is a good long post about the hollow moon. I read it a while ago and while it covers similar ground to "who made the moon?", which I've also read, this was written by a different author later on and has some interesting bits and pieces of info that book didn't cover.
Fair warning, "metallicman" is an anonymous, self-described former spook, "majestic operative" who retired to China and supposedly has a 1980's era "nerualink" in his head, which is now defunct. Interesting website, make of it what you will.
did you intend to post a link?
The first word in my comment, "This", is a hyper link. Here's the full url:
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/the-hollow-moon/
oh, sorry, I was reading your reply in the "messages" area and the hyperlink didn't show up. I see it now, in the thread.
thank you,
Cheese people
"Secrets Big Cheese doesn't want you to know"
My fiance is a former marine and he said that during his tours in Iraq it was discussed - how they shot missiles at the moon and it sounded hollow. They didn't know why or who put it up there, though.
Lmao what?.. just blasting rockets at the moon and expecting to hear an impact let alone it being hollow... Sheeesh what a low effort stretch.
:) How do you think we find underground caves, oil pockets, measure the density of the earth etc...we use sophisticated sonar tech that measures sound waves. Same thing here.
Sign up while we're at it.. I want to sit around launching rockets at the moon lol
100% bullshit. Why would the military just random shoot missiles at the moon?
You know this isn't the playground in grade 4, right? Fucking missiles shot from earth wouldn't reach the moon fuck tard. It's called " combustion doesn't work in a vacuum"? The INSTANT the missile gets to a certain height - no oxygen anymore.
read a fucking book
100% wrong. Build a container, with a separator. Fill one half with oxygen. Fill other half with fuel - whatever you want. Place igniter at bottom. Make sure you have a vent for exhaust, or all you have is a bomb.
Place said container in a vacuum. Ignite the igniter and watch nothing happen. A vacuum separates all atoms. The SECOND you open the vent for exhaust, the process WILL fail.
We don't send rockets to space with them running, you KNOW that right?
We send them up into the atmosphere, they circle the earth and gain momentum with earths' gravity and slight adjustments to pitch. We use that gravitational 'fling' to propel to the Moon. Circle the moon in same way and keep going. This IS how's it's done, because combustion of ANY KIND does not work in a vacuum.
As well... sound cannot travel in a vacuum either, straight science. So IF you fired a rocket to the moon and it exploded, you wouldn't hear anything. Another point to prove this person's claim is 100% bullshit.
ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural". ALL represents energy in motion; the choice of ignorance thereof from the ONEs within is what "artificial" represents.
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced]. The momentum caused by energy in motion represents all the ONEs set into ALL motion...the produced nature.
In short...nature represents form within flow; artificial represents form within flow ignoring flow.
Jesus. Hence why there was no moon some two thousand years ago. Science
LOL you're not REALLY this stupid are you?
Moon wasn't there 2000 years ago??
Funny... ALL the ancient civilizations have it noted in detail. Chinese were accurately and repeatedly predicting solar and lunar eclipses 5000+ years ago = WELL documented.
How the literal fuck do you people even tie your own shoes?
The fact that their are no real photos of the earth from high orbit, or satellites leaving orbit, brings up a lot of Questions. And since nobody can give a clear answer on this. Speculation can lead to a wide range of theories, some grounded some far fetched.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/53xqb9/this_video_shows_apollo_11_astronauts_in_low/
So it just randomly appeared right after those long awaited 2k years. Right gotcha!