posted ago by ghost_of_aswartz ago by ghost_of_aswartz +17 / -8

Flat earth posts fall into one of 3 categories

  1. Stupid people who don't even know how to logically argue but instead when they are losing, they bring up the bible and use the word retard, asshole a lot and start attacking people. These people legitimately have never studied any science or history, or history of science and have never taken a flight with a window seat, flying into dawn to see the curvature for themselves; and have never used a camera of their own choosing, mounted on a weather balloon, or seen the video of peopel doing that for themselves, or launched their own nanosat to prove to themselves how wrong they are.

  2. Glowies whose aim is to divide and conquer by 5Ds -- Distract, Disrupt, Deny, Deflect, Discredit, Denigrate, Divide, D.... etc To make this forum look like a bunch of hairbrained illogical conspiracy obessives. Their aim is to destroy reputations and discredit people in the eyes of other people. Its works, that's why the glowie flat earth shills do this.

*Take Note: they come in waves. Yesterday was April 1 and at least 4 of them posted about flat earth.

  1. Irony-shitposting by People like myself who post obvious flat earth bullshitery
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Fubardian 10 points ago +13 / -3

Why do we have to prove it is flat. Why don't you prove it is round. How about your show proof of some curvature.

Fubardian 9 points ago +10 / -1

According to the size of the earth (per NASA) the curvature of the earth is 8 inches squared per mile. An example being three miles times eight inches is 24 inches times three again is 72 inches. So after three miles it is a six foot drop in curvature. The web site below has the farthest picture ever taken. It is taken from 2.8 miles up and takes a picture of 4.1 miles high at a distance of 273.24 miles. 273.24 times 8 inches=2185.92 times 273.24=597,280 inches. 597,280 divided by 63,360 inches in a mile equals 9.4 miles of curvature. 9.4 miles of curvature minus the altitude of the pictures, 4.1 and 2.8 equals 2.5 miles. That mountain is behind 2.5 miles of curvature according to NASA, but you can see it in the photo. That is absolutely impossible unless the earth is flat. PLEASE EXPLAIN

ArcturianDeathTrap 3 points ago +3 / -0

8 inches squared per mile... and yet theres many photos that show up to 80 miles clear to the other side of Salar de Uyuni, the world's longest salt flat. After it rains, the whole surface is a mirror, as far as the eye should see there should only be a mirror, not the base of ranges at the other end, of which, should be 20 storeys below the viewers sight

Fubardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am going to assume you are agreeing with me, because you are correct. I was saying the earth wasn't a ball

FlatSmurf 8 points ago +10 / -2

Lol. This guy still thinks he lives on a spinning globe. What are you 5?

FortheGenerations 7 points ago +9 / -2

"Notice There's No Evidence" - ? government documents talking about flat earth and Firmament.

WiseOwlz 5 points ago +6 / -1

Why do you care so much they think it’s flat?

It’s like saying Earth has a core...that is a theory.

Usernames1 3 points ago +4 / -1

Good thing the hero of the internet is here. HOW ABOUT ya just keep scrolling and let adults talk instead of throwing insults.

If you like controlling topics so much why don't you just head on back to reddit.

free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +6 / -4

no evidence, only doubt

What if the path from doubt to evidence is sealed by the Antarctic Treaty System?

pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could you elaborate on this one?

free-will-of-choice -2 points ago +1 / -3

Article 1 of the treaty states "Antarctica shall be used for peaceful purposes only. There shall be prohibited, inter alia, any measures of a military nature"

Don't disturb the penguins and all that...sounds great; doesn't it? Now, what are the implications of having the international military might, of an alleged 54 parties (all under the usury cartel), protecting Antarctica from "any measures of a military nature"?

That's called a contradiction.

pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0


I'm quite sure there are big Revelations with a capital R being sealed in antarctica.

Hyperborea and Agartha seems to be highly correlated.

Although i don't see how it could correlate to flat/round earth theories.

free-will-of-choice -2 points ago +1 / -3

Although i don't see how it could correlate to flat/round earth theories.

"flat versus round" equals believing in truth versus false aka the conflict of reason, hence this being a suggested contract of belief with the intent do divide. Instead of reason (truth vs false); let's use implication (if/then), because that's in adherence to motion (reality). No conflict between inception and death.

Anyway; if the military operates on the "high ground" principle for control; then why would they surround the small to protect it from the big? Let's add the parasitic few, controlling the ignorant many to the mix, and we have a chain of command that keeps the many in check. Military and chain of command? Yep; checks out.

So wouldn't the few consolidate their power over all; by utilizing the chain of command, to protect the big from the squeezed small aka holding the "high ground"?

Another perspective...the conflict is directed towards "shape", which means "to form", which within the natural connotation represents the ONE within the ALL "forming" out of. What if it's not about shape; but about "size", which means "magnitude; quantity" aka the natural connotation for the collective of ONEs...the ALL?

The less ONE comprehends about the ALL; the more other (((ONEs))) can tempt with what the ONE doesn't comprehend about ALL. Right now they're using the space story to suggest to us physical infinity; which tricks us to perceive physical inferiority about ONEself.

Add darkness; black holes and endless threats to suggest fear; while using exploration to suggest hope, and the ONE can be deceived to ignore what "mental" infinity would represent for self...being ONE limited potential within ALL unlimited potentiality; defined not by the physical, but by ONEs mental comprehension of ALL information perceived, with the physical representing the form used to allow information being communicated as inspiration through the consequences of actions set into motion.

Hyperborea and Agartha

His-story; not the story of ONEself; written by the consequences of ONEs actions into ONEs bloodline. When you read (((his-story))); don't get attached to the names, symbols, dates etc. aka believing those who offer his-story; but instead question the allegories used to hide the natural connotations from those who his-story is suggested to.

Both Hyperborea (beyond north) and Agartha (underneath) suggest specific placements to bait "want", which tricks ONE to ignore the "need" to sustain self within ALL, which represents ONEs placement within the balance of ALL aka the free will of choice between need and want.

Notice how in all of his-story the main character is missing...ONE-self, yet they all want the ONE to sue his free will of choice to believe them. What are the implications for consenting to that? Ignorance of self.

rilyn 2 points ago +4 / -2

I believe the flat earth phenomenon has been a psy-op to experiment with the beliefs of the masses.

Usernames1 4 points ago +6 / -2

And I believe the flat earth ball earth phenomenon has been a psy-op to experiment with the beliefs of the masses Hide God

Look into copernicus and the history of whole the ball got started.

rilyn 1 point ago +1 / -0

As though the Earth being round precludes the existence of God! Neither does evolution. The existence of God is obvious in the fact and truth that we have bodies, senses, and an Earth to live on.

Usernames1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Before Hollywood people used to look up at the stairs and say WOW. God made all this for me. Im special. Now they look up and say wow. We are small and insignificant. The ball model dilutes God's wonderful creation.

rilyn 1 point ago +1 / -0

The assertion that any mental model of the Universe by man has any baring on God's wonderful creation is poopy nonsense.

Usernames1 1 point ago +1 / -0

For you, sure. But MAYBE for others... not as much.

ExcitableMugwump 0 points ago +1 / -1

Evidence of infiltration of this site and spread of disinformation like flat Earth theories proves people with power and money to pay for astroturfing feel threatened by websites like and free and open discussion.

Usernames1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Where's my paycheck?

whomurderedepstein 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's quite interesting that no globers showed up to conspire with you.

Clobro 1 point ago +2 / -1

The earth is clearly a cube for fuck sake. C'MON MAN!

whomurderedepstein 2 points ago +2 / -0

No it's the size of jupiter. We are under a hollow ice dome, encircled by antiartica. The earth is hollow and there are many ice domes like ours on the planet all connected through under ground tunnels.

OperationQ 0 points ago +1 / -1

?"The Earth Is Flat & Stationary: Destroying The Freemasonic Luciferian Globalist "Globe" Lie" ?

?"The Black Nobility Jesuit Order: Founders of Fascism, Freemasonry, Illuminati, The Vatican & Zionism" ?

? Connect & Please Share My Over ? Censored RedPilling Articles: ? ?

Ask_Dave -2 points ago +1 / -3

It's like saying "I can prove germ theory is wrong thus demons must cause all disease."