Although i don't see how it could correlate to flat/round earth theories.
"flat versus round" equals believing in truth versus false aka the conflict of reason, hence this being a suggested contract of belief with the intent do divide. Instead of reason (truth vs false); let's use implication (if/then), because that's in adherence to motion (reality). No conflict between inception and death.
Anyway; if the military operates on the "high ground" principle for control; then why would they surround the small to protect it from the big? Let's add the parasitic few, controlling the ignorant many to the mix, and we have a chain of command that keeps the many in check. Military and chain of command? Yep; checks out.
So wouldn't the few consolidate their power over all; by utilizing the chain of command, to protect the big from the squeezed small aka holding the "high ground"?
Another perspective...the conflict is directed towards "shape", which means "to form", which within the natural connotation represents the ONE within the ALL "forming" out of. What if it's not about shape; but about "size", which means "magnitude; quantity" aka the natural connotation for the collective of ONEs...the ALL?
The less ONE comprehends about the ALL; the more other (((ONEs))) can tempt with what the ONE doesn't comprehend about ALL. Right now they're using the space story to suggest to us physical infinity; which tricks us to perceive physical inferiority about ONEself.
Add darkness; black holes and endless threats to suggest fear; while using exploration to suggest hope, and the ONE can be deceived to ignore what "mental" infinity would represent for self...being ONE limited potential within ALL unlimited potentiality; defined not by the physical, but by ONEs mental comprehension of ALL information perceived, with the physical representing the form used to allow information being communicated as inspiration through the consequences of actions set into motion.
Hyperborea and Agartha
His-story; not the story of ONEself; written by the consequences of ONEs actions into ONEs bloodline. When you read (((his-story))); don't get attached to the names, symbols, dates etc. aka believing those who offer his-story; but instead question the allegories used to hide the natural connotations from those who his-story is suggested to.
Both Hyperborea (beyond north) and Agartha (underneath) suggest specific placements to bait "want", which tricks ONE to ignore the "need" to sustain self within ALL, which represents ONEs placement within the balance of ALL aka the free will of choice between need and want.
Notice how in all of his-story the main character is missing...ONE-self, yet they all want the ONE to sue his free will of choice to believe them. What are the implications for consenting to that? Ignorance of self.
"flat versus round" equals believing in truth versus false aka the conflict of reason, hence this being a suggested contract of belief with the intent do divide. Instead of reason (truth vs false); let's use implication (if/then), because that's in adherence to motion (reality). No conflict between inception and death.
Anyway; if the military operates on the "high ground" principle for control; then why would they surround the small to protect it from the big? Let's add the parasitic few, controlling the ignorant many to the mix, and we have a chain of command that keeps the many in check. Military and chain of command? Yep; checks out.
So wouldn't the few consolidate their power over all; by utilizing the chain of command, to protect the big from the squeezed small aka holding the "high ground"?
Another perspective...the conflict is directed towards "shape", which means "to form", which within the natural connotation represents the ONE within the ALL "forming" out of. What if it's not about shape; but about "size", which means "magnitude; quantity" aka the natural connotation for the collective of ONEs...the ALL?
The less ONE comprehends about the ALL; the more other (((ONEs))) can tempt with what the ONE doesn't comprehend about ALL. Right now they're using the space story to suggest to us physical infinity; which tricks us to perceive physical inferiority about ONEself.
Add darkness; black holes and endless threats to suggest fear; while using exploration to suggest hope, and the ONE can be deceived to ignore what "mental" infinity would represent for self...being ONE limited potential within ALL unlimited potentiality; defined not by the physical, but by ONEs mental comprehension of ALL information perceived, with the physical representing the form used to allow information being communicated as inspiration through the consequences of actions set into motion.
His-story; not the story of ONEself; written by the consequences of ONEs actions into ONEs bloodline. When you read (((his-story))); don't get attached to the names, symbols, dates etc. aka believing those who offer his-story; but instead question the allegories used to hide the natural connotations from those who his-story is suggested to.
Both Hyperborea (beyond north) and Agartha (underneath) suggest specific placements to bait "want", which tricks ONE to ignore the "need" to sustain self within ALL, which represents ONEs placement within the balance of ALL aka the free will of choice between need and want.
Notice how in all of his-story the main character is missing...ONE-self, yet they all want the ONE to sue his free will of choice to believe them. What are the implications for consenting to that? Ignorance of self.