Explain satellites you flat earth dumbtards
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
How do they move helium balloons across the sky at such incredible speeds?
Why can I see the satellite but not the balloon it is attached to?
Do you retards ever think before posting?
Yet all the footage from space is a fraud. You don't know what you are looking at.
So, you have no answer for the questions.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0S6CI65rJu73/ project blue beam possible explanation
There could be many explanations. It could be project blue beam
Well majority of space fotages being fraud don't proves earth being flat.
Small hint: http://thedailychrenk.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/aliens.jpg
They most likely use liquid helium cooling systems
It’s a rare element. Almost gone. Better get them mineral rights.
That's a myth.
Or maybe a conspiracy
Well when we would have fussion reactors it would be quite common.
Oi git, it's spacetime that's flat. And this is not really up for dispute anymore, the flatness of the universe has been pretty conclusively demonstrated by ESA's Planck.
I um... I dispute that as Questionable. And in doing so, disprove your statement. And as evidence, I shall offer up this proof. ?
Uh oh time cube has been unleashed
Timecube... those were the days...
Wow that link is... something. ?
ESA I don't trust either
Spam
Lmao the fake space enforcement.
I can see them go across in my telescope on the regular and they aren't attached to balloons moving that fast. I can also see the space station on occasion. Modern cameras and image capture is pretty amazing with a good mount/scope. Helium can be used for more than balloon work too. Earth is not flat, I've been to 55k feet and seen the curve with my eyes.
it's called project blue beam. They are not real..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS4jPjs6JPw
Antenna arrays. All your TV, internet, gps, radio comes from antennas.
Here is Canada we always have to point our dishes south to pick up the signals.
https://public.nrao.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/vla_panorama_med-1-1170x600.jpg
?"The Earth Is Flat & Stationary: Destroying The Freemasonic Luciferian Globalist "Globe" Lie" ? https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/the-earth-is-flat-stationary-destroying-the-freemasonic-luciferian-globalist-globe-lie
?"The Black Nobility Jesuit Order: Founders of Fascism, Freemasonry, Illuminati, The Vatican & Zionism" ? https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/the-black-nobility-jesuit-order-founders-of-fascism-freemasonry-illuminati-the-vatican-and-zionism
? Connect & Please Share My Over ? Censored RedPilling Articles: ? https://link-tube.com/OperationQ ? https://t.me/OperationCue
Go to google and find me a none CGI picture of one is space. They don't exist. In all of humanity we have never had a video of a rocket or satellite being shot into space that doesn't change frames just as it should enter space, never. Why can't they show the whole thing? Better yet, why don't you show me a video of a satellite being shot into space? Just do a little bit of research and you will find that you don't have any proof that they exist.
It's this simple man. The curve of the earth is 8 inches squared per mile. If I am 6 feet tall and I am looking out 3 miles over water that is 6 times 3 inches for 24, times 3 again for 72 inches. So if I am 6 feet tall or under I won't be able to see any shore line over 3 miles. Grab a telescope and go find a big body of water. When you see shoreline pick up a Bible. God is real and he build this for us. God bless and have some fun with it.
Here are a bunch of pics. I'd like to see you disprove them and explain how and why they are not real.
https://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2-uncategorised/493-non-composite-images-of-the-earth-from-space
Really. Are you sure these aren't the photo's they took?https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4adff3cd66049f169d5437d0a646d4f6
HAHAHA, NAsa is full of crap and below is that math for ya. For your pleasure I even used pictures not from fake ass NASA.
According to the size of the earth (per NASA) the curvature of the earth is 8 inches squared per mile. An example being three miles times eight inches is 24 inches times three again is 72 inches. So after three miles it is a six foot drop in curvature. The web site below has the farthest picture ever taken. It is taken from 2.8 miles up and takes a picture of 4.1 miles high at a distance of 273.24 miles. 273.24 times 8 inches=2185.92 times 273.24=597,280 inches. 597,280 divided by 63,360 inches in a mile equals 9.4 miles of curvature. 9.4 miles of curvature minus the altitude of the pictures, 4.1 and 2.8 equals 2.5 miles. That mountain is behind 2.5 miles of curvature according to NASA, but you can see it in the photo. That is absolutely impossible unless the earth is flat. PLEASE EXPLAIN
https://beyondrange.wordpress.com/2016/08/03/pic-de-finestrelles-pic-gaspard-ecrins-443-km/
Please explain that..... Uh.... It's averaged 8 inches. The fucking planet is not a smooth sphere with zero elevation difference you fucking dolt.
Nice dodge on the images I showed you though. That's all you fucking retarded flat Earth idiots do. Avoid the point I brought up, which directly answered the question asked, and then go off on the 8 inch bullshit. Then once that's addressed you'll bring up some other fact. Gish gallop away.
Anyways, fall off the edge of the Earth for all I care, the world would be better without anti-intellectual bullshit.
That 8 inches is your precious Nasa math, are you mad that it proves the earth is flat? Also you dodged with never showing a satallite pick. I didn't dodge I was pointing out that they have so many fake info that you know you can't trust them, cause which pic is the real one. If they all are then how do the continent's change size.
Again you call me names instead of trying to use your brain and think for a second, but sure. You can call me all the names you would like as long as it makes you feel better. God bless.
I notice you don't say where my math is wrong. Those figures are actually per NASA. So you saying that I am wrong is saying that the people who "prove space" are wrong. So that is funny. Also Nasa comes from the Hebrew word to deceive. Also did you not find the satallite pictures you were looking for? Remember you just said Nasa's math was incorrect, you yourself just said that. So if nasa isn't correct who is?
Why pose the question if you don't actually want the answer? Just to try to make yourself feel better about yourself? Have fun with that and know that I still love you and hope the best for you in the future.
You're right, no question. Just you looking for answers.