Like most Conspiracy Theorist I got my start with the UFO phenomenon. I’ve always had a fascination with the subject because Military Political and UFOs all go together. And Because of my fascination stems from seeing UFOs and other Paranormal Experiences that has happened to me. However these days the “ONLY Conspiracy Theory” that gets mentioned is QNON. (Which is a retarded name). However the basic premise of the theory is that Satanic Elites run the World. It’s very interesting to see THE MEDIA STILL TALKING ABOUT IT. Even after Trumps gone. I saw a thing on Vice talking about the “Search for Q”. Why is the media obsessed with Q? The media killed the Epstein story because of its connections with Clinton. And Clinton was trying to become Queen in 2016. So of course they sided with Clinton. Since the media is Democrat State Run Media. Now I never read the original posts on 4 or 8 Chan (?). I tried searching for it but they were basically already scrubbed from the internet and the only resource I could find was Wikipedia and fake News sources. Ever since CNN hired John Brennan CIA Chief everything that doesn’t follow the narrative is a Conspiracy Theory and must be Q related. I’ve made multiple Trump related Conspiracy posts on Reddit Conspiracy before I got banned and lots of trolls accuse you of being Q. Like every remotely positive post people accuse you of being Q. They don’t even know what Q is and they are accusing you of being Q because the post is a positive Trump post. It’s a conspiracy in itself how anything positive Trump Conspiracy attacking Democrats is a Q post. I know they are shills/bots but it’s very concerning how it’s not okay to criticize Democrats. But if you say Trump is a Putin’s Agent then that is suddenly treated as a legit “fact based news”. But now after Trump is gone and Democrats looking to ban anyone who buys the Q Story from gaining Security Clearance is very interesting. Why go to these lengths if Q is bull shit? Makes me think it’s not bull shit when you go to these lengths that ban critical thinking of political enemies.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
conspiracy theory = truth = wrongthink
I'm 50/50 on Q but the fact that the MSM are still obsessed with it, even 2 weeks after Trump has gone ("gone"?), really does speak volumes.
I’ve heard 3 different “deep dives / exposés / whatever you’d call em” on “the Q phenomenon” from MSM.
Not one of them attempts to identify the person(s) behind the posts other than general terms like anons.
Not one of them (these were all after the 6th) addressed the fact that Q made multiple posts since both the “failed insurrection” and the “nothingberger inauguration”, they all imply that Q fans all of a sudden headless chickens without direction.
Basically they talk about Q while spending as little time as possible talking about Q...
The scariest thing about it is that the CIA is controlled by several different foreign nations/entities.
That’s always been the case. See operation mockingbird .
It should’ve been real clear when they dumped the left wing/right wing stuff and all aligned against the president and gave him 90% negative coverage from the day he got in office, every year. It was so obvious even Harvard made studies pointing out the clear bias.
That and when newt Gingrich said on the campaign trail the reason why he’s being attacked because he’s not in the secret club.
“We know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” William Casey
Funny. I don't hear that at all. Have you tried turning your TV on and OFF again?
He’s got a point, at some stage (around the age of 12) it becomes incumbent upon the individual to not fester in the poison like a pig in shit
Yes. Now who is "He". Me or him? Or to ask, are you talking of me to others, or to me of Elest808?
In case anyone doesn't understand what I was attempting to say in my original reply. I don't see the media being taken over by the CIA, because when you turn your TV on, and then off again, the end position of the television is OFF.
He, in this instance, is you, and I was talking to the 5 idiots who downvoted your valid contribution to the conversation!
To be honest, I should have quoted the passage I was replying to, to make it easier for others to understand my turn of words. Because, I now see that my reply may be viewed as me replying to the contents of the argument, and not just the title.