Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

3
What are your takes on the current state of QAnon?
posted 4 years ago by ScutFarkus 4 years ago by ScutFarkus +21 / -18

Where or how did it go wrong? Was it disinformation from the start or was it infiltrated? How did Q miss the mark on so many big ticket items?

39 comments share
39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– pache 4 points 4 years ago +5 / -1

where did Q miss? the predictions seem so vague..

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +2 / -3

Hillary would be arrested in 2017 for starters. That one was decidedly not vague.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Son_Of_Honkler 3 points 4 years ago +4 / -1

That's not a Q post.

That was a comment quoted by Q and it never said 2017.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Motzfeldt 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Not a Q supporter/out here to defend him (I'm on the fence), but to be fair, that post was never signed by Q, ergo, not posted by Q.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pache 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

where can one find all the signed Q posts?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Motzfeldt 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

https://qagg.news - for example

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

How about claiming the Mueller report would lead to Hillary’s arrest?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Motzfeldt 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

I'm not sure what you're referencing, link please.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

I’ve got a much better idea that would save us both a whole bunch of time. What has Q gotten right? Because that list will be MUCH shorter, if it can be produced at all. Facts, not feelings. Or hunches.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Motzfeldt 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Again, don't mistake me for a hardcore Q supporter, 'cos I'm not. I've had plenty of doubts, criticism and scepticism. But that said, sometimes I do believe. For the purpose of your post I'll play devil's advocate a bit.

As to what Q "has gotten right", I find that a strange way of interpreting it, because Q does not simply say "X will happen on Y date". It's not such binary, not so deductive, you know? Q uses the Socratic method, and points you to the path. Most of the "claims" that "Q has made" are actually just popular interpretations of Q posts by anons.

But for "things" that were hinted by Q, that were confirmed, the biggest one off the top of my head is John McCain. Q in a less subtler than usual way, hinted that McCain was going to be executed and it will be on the headlines. 30 days later TO THE GODDAMN MINUTE OF THAT Q POST, there was a headline in a big American newspaper claiming McCain was dead.

That one was pretty crazy I felt. I remember Q as well, mocking Nancy Pelosi and her choice of words a week before she used those words... "Don't bring a bow and arrow to a missile fight" or something similar, 1 week later, Pelosi is on TV saying she "still has some arrows left in her quiver" (more or less) with regards to bringing down Trump (1 week before the election). That one as well also really made me go wtf, how can you know the choice of words someone is going to use a WEEK beforehand?

Those are just 2 examples I can think of off the top of my head, where Q hinted X, and X happened in real life not long after. You will probably want to talk to a more dedicated/faithful Q supporters who knows a lot more about this stuff than I do. I haven't watched half as many Q-dissection videos as others have.

I have seen people break the drops down to the last goddamn text character, and it would appear that there is indeed some cryptic, intelligent stuff going on. It really really isn't as simple as "Q said this! This didn't happen! Q is fake!".

But again... I remain a sceptic. My support is mainly conditional on the fact that there is a Best By date with regards to Q/Trump. We will know 100% sure if it's the real deal or not within the month. No harm in just going along with it for the next few weeks 'cos what else is there to lose

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

I think being skeptical is actually healthy. And I’ve had thoughts that Q could be someone in the DNC trying to discredit the conspiracy community. So they could in fact BE an insider. I just don’t know anymore but yes, skepticism is a prerequisite in today’s world.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– NelsonMandelaffect -4 points 4 years ago +2 / -6

But for "things" that were hinted by Q, that were confirmed, the biggest one off the top of my head is John McCain. Q in a less subtler than usual way, hinted that McCain was going to be executed and it will be on the headlines. 30 days later TO THE GODDAMN MINUTE OF THAT Q POST, there was a headline in a big American newspaper claiming McCain was dead.

I always found this utterly idiotic. Does he have psychic powers? Was he predicting the future? Did he know about the exact time of announcement a month before, then posted cryptic bullshit to time it 30 days from an execution? Nevermind the implications of people cheering on secret fucking executions in the conspiracy world.

Completely fucking retarded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Son_Of_Honkler 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Source, specific Q post number please. I'd like to see if this was something Q actually said or something you interpreted.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– PutinLovesCats 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Ever heard of Looking Glasses?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

I’ve heard of “project looking glass”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– PutinLovesCats 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

So, what are your thoughts on it/them? I ask this, because it's relevant being that Q has said "future proves past".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] 0 points 4 years ago +2 / -2

My feeling for the longest time has been “I want to believe”, especially because nothing in our world can be taken at face value and everyone is trying to rip you off somehow. I just feel let down at this point with Q, and Sidney and all of the happenings that never happen. I feel like every time it’s “this time will be different” or when something doesn’t work out, there’s no explanation it’s just “part of the plan”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– jedijobay 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I feel the exact same way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– NelsonMandelaffect -3 points 4 years ago +3 / -6

Trust sessions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RedPill78 3 points 4 years ago +5 / -2

https://youtu.be/8fwgVUfW_O4

permalink save report block reply
▲ -7 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -7 points 4 years ago +1 / -8

I’m not clicking your shitty boomer link. Go back to Facebook.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +4 / -2
▲ -2 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -2 points 4 years ago +1 / -3

Not that I owe you an explanation for my behavior or choice of words here, but please, check his first comment in this thread buried at the bottom. He’s either a troll or a boomer agitator.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2
▲ 2 ▼
– DRQ- 2 points 4 years ago +3 / -1

Q is what Q has always been: a backchannel from the US military and Trump, giving us a heads up as to what they are doing, and the war they are in against the cabal. Very few parts are disinformation, many have been useful to us, just at the right time, such as 'do not fear' when the CV fear plague hit, and HCQ as the cure. As for the vaccine, Q posted 'we're not going to take it' which when combined with Trump not making it mandatory, is the confirmation we need to choose not to take it. I'm trusting the plan. Biden goes to jail, Trump is the president for another four years.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

How come Hillary isn’t in prison? How come nothing has happened to the deep state? Why is the swamp deeper than ever? These are just a few.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– DRQ- 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Watch all the videos on StopWorldControl.com

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Son_Of_Honkler 0 points 4 years ago +2 / -2

I haven't been following QAnon very much, but it is becoming clear that President Trump has been planning what he's doing in the courts, for at least 4 years given:

  • President Trump's Supreme Court Justice picks that are all experts in enforcing voter integrity;

  • The 2018 Executive Order about Election Fraud... and possibly the EO declaring an emergency because of foreign and domestic corruption...

  • Election reform was a major 2016 campaign promise and the only one he seemingly "forgot" about... or that's what I thought when President Trump didn't contest a single stolen seat during the midterms. I'm not certain he was setting up this honeypot.

Q has been telling us that this isn't just another 4 year election and we should trust the plan... perhaps we are now witnessing part of what the plan is? Q kept talking about how the Senate was safe during the midterms... perhaps that's because this was a honeypot?

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

I thought the SCOTUS was where this whole thing ended. 6-3 with a curated selection of would be loyalists? I genuinely thought Biden was about to get dunked on. Bad. I don’t know what happened. Or what chance Trump really has from here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Son_Of_Honkler 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Are you referring to the SC Texas decision not to hear the case, because thank God they didn't... because if the SC concerned itself with states suing each other, it would render the state SCs moot and the SC would be flooded endlessly with appeals for EVERY case tried in every state SC.

People don't want to hear this, but it's the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pache 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

the case was denied on standing. can't use states for laws that harm you, otherwise it'd open the can of worms like WA can't have legal weed it damages Idaho or something.

i believe Trump re-applied where he's the one hurt by the violations, but I dunno where to confirm that...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

Did the lawyers not know they couldn’t make that case? Is this not something they would want to get right?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– pache 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

probably, yes, many lawyers didn't think it would go through.......

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– NelsonMandelaffect -4 points 4 years ago +1 / -5

The 2018 EO allows him to put sanctions on foreign nationals. IT's not some magic martial law bullshit where he just stays in power forever. You've been misled.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Scroon 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Q never made any verifiable predictions. He's a cheerleader and a guide not a critical intel leaker.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Fringe--dweller 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

https://thedonald.win/p/11QRfTBnHy/new-secdef-gives-0-fucks-targets/c/

New SecDef gives 0 fucks.

Targets globalists ("trans-national threats") on Day 1.

"This has been in the works for 30 years"

permalink save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– NelsonMandelaffect -3 points 4 years ago +2 / -5

Q drop #14: Has POTUS ever said anything that didn't turn out to be true?

Kim Jong Il level propaganda in the house. Supreme leader does not lie, he always right.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– RedPill78 -3 points 4 years ago +4 / -7

my take is you are dumbass.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

So Q nailed everything, huh.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy