0
pache 0 points ago +1 / -1

probably, yes, many lawyers didn't think it would go through.......

1
pache 1 point ago +1 / -0

aren't those projected numbers...?

1
pache 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would love this, too.. how do I subscribe to your post to see replies to it?

3
pache 3 points ago +3 / -0

..."excess deaths" is your main data source? what about just raw deaths?

1
pache 1 point ago +2 / -1

the case was denied on standing. can't use states for laws that harm you, otherwise it'd open the can of worms like WA can't have legal weed it damages Idaho or something.

i believe Trump re-applied where he's the one hurt by the violations, but I dunno where to confirm that...

1
pache 1 point ago +1 / -0

where can one find all the signed Q posts?

4
pache 4 points ago +5 / -1

where did Q miss? the predictions seem so vague..