Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

3
What are your takes on the current state of QAnon?
posted 4 years ago by ScutFarkus 4 years ago by ScutFarkus +21 / -18

Where or how did it go wrong? Was it disinformation from the start or was it infiltrated? How did Q miss the mark on so many big ticket items?

39 comments share
39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Motzfeldt 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Not a Q supporter/out here to defend him (I'm on the fence), but to be fair, that post was never signed by Q, ergo, not posted by Q.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pache 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

where can one find all the signed Q posts?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Motzfeldt 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

https://qagg.news - for example

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

How about claiming the Mueller report would lead to Hillary’s arrest?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Motzfeldt 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

I'm not sure what you're referencing, link please.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ScutFarkus [S] -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

I’ve got a much better idea that would save us both a whole bunch of time. What has Q gotten right? Because that list will be MUCH shorter, if it can be produced at all. Facts, not feelings. Or hunches.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Motzfeldt 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Again, don't mistake me for a hardcore Q supporter, 'cos I'm not. I've had plenty of doubts, criticism and scepticism. But that said, sometimes I do believe. For the purpose of your post I'll play devil's advocate a bit.

As to what Q "has gotten right", I find that a strange way of interpreting it, because Q does not simply say "X will happen on Y date". It's not such binary, not so deductive, you know? Q uses the Socratic method, and points you to the path. Most of the "claims" that "Q has made" are actually just popular interpretations of Q posts by anons.

But for "things" that were hinted by Q, that were confirmed, the biggest one off the top of my head is John McCain. Q in a less subtler than usual way, hinted that McCain was going to be executed and it will be on the headlines. 30 days later TO THE GODDAMN MINUTE OF THAT Q POST, there was a headline in a big American newspaper claiming McCain was dead.

That one was pretty crazy I felt. I remember Q as well, mocking Nancy Pelosi and her choice of words a week before she used those words... "Don't bring a bow and arrow to a missile fight" or something similar, 1 week later, Pelosi is on TV saying she "still has some arrows left in her quiver" (more or less) with regards to bringing down Trump (1 week before the election). That one as well also really made me go wtf, how can you know the choice of words someone is going to use a WEEK beforehand?

Those are just 2 examples I can think of off the top of my head, where Q hinted X, and X happened in real life not long after. You will probably want to talk to a more dedicated/faithful Q supporters who knows a lot more about this stuff than I do. I haven't watched half as many Q-dissection videos as others have.

I have seen people break the drops down to the last goddamn text character, and it would appear that there is indeed some cryptic, intelligent stuff going on. It really really isn't as simple as "Q said this! This didn't happen! Q is fake!".

But again... I remain a sceptic. My support is mainly conditional on the fact that there is a Best By date with regards to Q/Trump. We will know 100% sure if it's the real deal or not within the month. No harm in just going along with it for the next few weeks 'cos what else is there to lose

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 0 ▼
– Son_Of_Honkler 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Source, specific Q post number please. I'd like to see if this was something Q actually said or something you interpreted.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy