what do you mean not support it? Im the only one providing support, here.
Here is the link to add to the others I've destroyed you on
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UHXIR1LjnXU
Watch the whole interview and then tell us you werent intentionally misled by that cropped clip.
and how anyone interpreted that 1h22m scene to represent an admission with a straight face and, even when pointed out, is not even embarrassing to you(??) Yeah. that's all I need to know about people like you.
Q is that way ---->
I admit I was moved by some of these comparisons 15 years ago that I later recanted on.
Well, lets revisit...
Ok, so the last 20 mins includes the stanley kubrick hoax actor, and also a buzz aldrin out of context interview. If you watch the whole kid and buzz interview (11 mins) its painstakingly obvious this was willfully snipped out to serve up dishonest propaganda. The entire interview, both and after this question, Buzz is saying they went to the moon. If this is a sample of rest of video's integrity im glad I only endured 20 mins.
As for symbolism in movie. Talk to somebody who has taken a film studies class. To the film student, it is all so mundane to what the lay person sees as hidden meaning; compared to what director is obviously screaming from the roof tops. At 1h23m the narrator of the video, for example, says something so stupid it's, frankly, embarrassing. and I've already forgotten it.
Don't be fooled by the Stanley Kubrick interview hoax, either
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yDyJe1nmSOM&t=36m40s
Watch 45 seconds
A lot of money going into fake interview
That asshole Kubrick was everywhere man
https://aae.lib.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AABG_St.-Petersburg_11-05-20-1920x1440.jpg
That is the dumbest shit I've ever heard.
Gold can be broken down into fractions. There is no such thing as "not enough." It is precisely its rarity and other features that makes it valuable. If you halved the amount of available gold on the planet then that would double the price. And would have zero effect on having "enough."
Indigo child. Thats a term I haven't heard in 25 years. Naturally I figured they were yanking chains. Appeal to ego or whatever.
What is it about having a willingness to scratch beneath the surface. Fearlessness to challenge authority. Ability to use logic. Investigate. Sharper observational skills. Higher IQ? What does that mean? Ability to work through problems in your mind and play with ideas with your imagination.
What is the opposite? No willingness to shake foundation. Authority tells them what to think. No interest tinkering with details. Dull observational skills. Low IQ, or inability to imagine or work through problems.
Whatever the reason. Having the ability to dissect some information in today's hailstorm of data, is great to have.
Choosing not to watch Rosanne is very different than creating a mob and threatening to burn down the studio, organizing psychopaths in a campaign to end careers.
Of course. Since you are a terrorist, I would not expect you to see the difference.
That valarie girl looks just like the lead female role from planet of the apes and you know it.
Admitting an interest and changing mind is not a game. You know what is a game, though? Pretending, unfaithfully, you watched the Buzz interview. This is the mindset of people like you. Quick to send 20 minute or 6 hour videos expecting a respeonse but won't commit even a few minutes to do the same. We can presume because you aren't actually willing to explore new information since your mind is already made up. That is YOUR game.