I admit I was moved by some of these comparisons 15 years ago that I later recanted on.
Well, lets revisit...
Ok, so the last 20 mins includes the stanley kubrick hoax actor, and also a buzz aldrin out of context interview. If you watch the whole kid and buzz interview (11 mins) its painstakingly obvious this was willfully snipped out to serve up dishonest propaganda. The entire interview, both and after this question, Buzz is saying they went to the moon. If this is a sample of rest of video's integrity im glad I only endured 20 mins.
As for symbolism in movie. Talk to somebody who has taken a film studies class. To the film student, it is all so mundane to what the lay person sees as hidden meaning; compared to what director is obviously screaming from the roof tops. At 1h23m the narrator of the video, for example, says something so stupid it's, frankly, embarrassing. and I've already forgotten it.
Then the gaslighting kike has the gall to say I never watched 20 mins of his video, and I was the one who actually introduced the fake Kubrick video in order to muddy the waters. Wtaf.
(Screenshots only before the dirty rat edits out his comments.)
Ultimately, I used to believe these types of posts were all apart of random shallow attempts to tear down Man's exceptionalism.
Now I understand they are a concerted jewish attempt to tear down White Man's exceptionalism. Space exploration to the moon was a victory for humanity but certain jews see must see it as a White man's victory that needs to be "revisionised."
Kubrick was a jew, like Op. Any symbolism in some movie was for the sake of pure interest in space at best, or to sew some sort of future doubt, at worst. Op, meanwhile, pretends he hates jews. That's because Op follows the motto of:
"Accuse others of what you are guilty of"
--some commie jew
Here is the video that proves Kubrick confession was a hoax, played by an actor named Tom, and Op is willfully spreading propaganda:
After watching this short snippet (starts at 36m and 41seconds, no need to watch entirety, although any would benefit from the whole thing) - after watching 45 seconds you will say to yourself "oh shit, an actor named Tom, made to impersonate Stanley Kubrick, was directed these lines to make it appear a confession. I wonder who would pay for such a thing. I now question why the documentary that has been spreading online dares omit this inconvenient 45 seconds, or why the video maker has not since denounced or retracted the fake confession?
That's what a white person would do, anyway. Instead Op keeps sending people to this fake confession video and when you bring up the fact that its a hoax, then accuses you of being the one who is spreading it!
And there's your summary of how we learned Op is a dirty, gaslighting, jew.
P.s. here is the chutzpah he uses to debate you on anything:
Don't be fooled by the Stanley Kubrick interview hoax, either
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yDyJe1nmSOM&t=36m40s
Watch 45 seconds
A lot of money going into fake interview
Kubrick aside, questions remain.
Anticipating a question isnt a new phenomenon. The first part of the question already asks the entire question
Watch the last 20 minutes or so
I admit I was moved by some of these comparisons 15 years ago that I later recanted on.
Well, lets revisit...
Ok, so the last 20 mins includes the stanley kubrick hoax actor, and also a buzz aldrin out of context interview. If you watch the whole kid and buzz interview (11 mins) its painstakingly obvious this was willfully snipped out to serve up dishonest propaganda. The entire interview, both and after this question, Buzz is saying they went to the moon. If this is a sample of rest of video's integrity im glad I only endured 20 mins.
As for symbolism in movie. Talk to somebody who has taken a film studies class. To the film student, it is all so mundane to what the lay person sees as hidden meaning; compared to what director is obviously screaming from the roof tops. At 1h23m the narrator of the video, for example, says something so stupid it's, frankly, embarrassing. and I've already forgotten it.
psyop inside a psyop is a psyop to obviously psyop
Exactly right. Op of this post is such a dirty rat, going multiple inception layers deep into deception. Turn of events:
Op, who I recently learned is a jew masquerading as a white, tells people to watch 20 mins of some video.
https://files.catbox.moe/9jpiwt.jpg
Link leads here:
https://ia804600.us.archive.org/35/items/the-great-masters-of-the-lie-part-1/The%20Great%20Masters%20of%20the%20LIE%20-%20Part%201.mp4
In last few mins of said video, Stanley Kubrick is seen in a dark room "admitting" to faking apollo11, here:
https://files.catbox.moe/b2g2je.jpg
At this point I still falsely think Op is white and accidentally spreading propaganda, but only in good faith.
https://files.catbox.moe/o9hsao.jpg
I inform him I watched his video but "Kubrick" in his video is actually an actor named Tom.
https://files.catbox.moe/znusmg.jpg
He finally later admits it looks like the clip I sent him proves it's from some disinfo scam attempt.
https://files.catbox.moe/ga201x.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/0p9xf1.jpg
Thats my point!
Then the gaslighting kike has the gall to say I never watched 20 mins of his video, and I was the one who actually introduced the fake Kubrick video in order to muddy the waters. Wtaf.
https://files.catbox.moe/o3fee3.jpg
(Screenshots only before the dirty rat edits out his comments.)
Ultimately, I used to believe these types of posts were all apart of random shallow attempts to tear down Man's exceptionalism.
Now I understand they are a concerted jewish attempt to tear down White Man's exceptionalism. Space exploration to the moon was a victory for humanity but certain jews see must see it as a White man's victory that needs to be "revisionised."
Kubrick was a jew, like Op. Any symbolism in some movie was for the sake of pure interest in space at best, or to sew some sort of future doubt, at worst. Op, meanwhile, pretends he hates jews. That's because Op follows the motto of:
"Accuse others of what you are guilty of" --some commie jew
Here is the video that proves Kubrick confession was a hoax, played by an actor named Tom, and Op is willfully spreading propaganda:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yDyJe1nmSOM&t=36m41s
After watching this short snippet (starts at 36m and 41seconds, no need to watch entirety, although any would benefit from the whole thing) - after watching 45 seconds you will say to yourself "oh shit, an actor named Tom, made to impersonate Stanley Kubrick, was directed these lines to make it appear a confession. I wonder who would pay for such a thing. I now question why the documentary that has been spreading online dares omit this inconvenient 45 seconds, or why the video maker has not since denounced or retracted the fake confession?
That's what a white person would do, anyway. Instead Op keeps sending people to this fake confession video and when you bring up the fact that its a hoax, then accuses you of being the one who is spreading it!
And there's your summary of how we learned Op is a dirty, gaslighting, jew.
P.s. here is the chutzpah he uses to debate you on anything:
Exhibit A https://files.catbox.moe/hqdg7x.jpg
Exhibit B https://files.catbox.moe/gbc6og.jpg
Exhibit C https://files.catbox.moe/nx8289.jpg
Exhibit D https://files.catbox.moe/7w2kw1.jpg
Exhibit E https://files.catbox.moe/78lele.jpg
Jury decision?
JEW
Holy wall of text, lefty 😂🤣
#StillCantProveItHappened