I admit I was moved by some of these comparisons 15 years ago that I later recanted on.
Well, lets revisit...
Ok, so the last 20 mins includes the stanley kubrick hoax actor, and also a buzz aldrin out of context interview. If you watch the whole kid and buzz interview (11 mins) its painstakingly obvious this was willfully snipped out to serve up dishonest propaganda. The entire interview, both and after this question, Buzz is saying they went to the moon. If this is a sample of rest of video's integrity im glad I only endured 20 mins.
As for symbolism in movie. Talk to somebody who has taken a film studies class. To the film student, it is all so mundane to what the lay person sees as hidden meaning; compared to what director is obviously screaming from the roof tops. At 1h23m the narrator of the video, for example, says something so stupid it's, frankly, embarrassing. and I've already forgotten it.
and how anyone interpreted that 1h22m scene to represent an admission with a straight face and, even when pointed out, is not even embarrassing to you(??) Yeah. that's all I need to know about people like you.
Anticipating a question isnt a new phenomenon. The first part of the question already asks the entire question
I admit I was moved by some of these comparisons 15 years ago that I later recanted on.
Well, lets revisit...
Ok, so the last 20 mins includes the stanley kubrick hoax actor, and also a buzz aldrin out of context interview. If you watch the whole kid and buzz interview (11 mins) its painstakingly obvious this was willfully snipped out to serve up dishonest propaganda. The entire interview, both and after this question, Buzz is saying they went to the moon. If this is a sample of rest of video's integrity im glad I only endured 20 mins.
As for symbolism in movie. Talk to somebody who has taken a film studies class. To the film student, it is all so mundane to what the lay person sees as hidden meaning; compared to what director is obviously screaming from the roof tops. At 1h23m the narrator of the video, for example, says something so stupid it's, frankly, embarrassing. and I've already forgotten it.
If 1st 20 mins is anything like last 20 then no thanks. Why won't you disavow the hoax you've sent to people?
and how anyone interpreted that 1h22m scene to represent an admission with a straight face and, even when pointed out, is not even embarrassing to you(??) Yeah. that's all I need to know about people like you.
Q is that way ---->