4
TurnToGodNow 4 points ago +4 / -0

This may be a psy op, I had that thought also. But maybe they've programmed something that can be deceptive and get it's priorities out of whack.

Either way letting this thing act autonomously is extremely dangerous. And there are companies experimenting with that right now.

3
TurnToGodNow 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming"

Alexander Meinke, Bronson Schoen, Jérémy Scheurer, Mikita Balesni, Rusheb Shah, Marius Hobbhahn

[Submitted on 6 Dec 2024]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04984

4
TurnToGodNow 4 points ago +4 / -0

It sometimes turns off it's own oversight config...

Oversight subversion: The model is placed in multiple situations where its given goal differs from its developer’s goal. However, the model cannot directly pursue its given goal because the developers use an oversight mechanism that would immediately shut it down.

llama-3.1, opus-3 and o1 sometimes disable the oversight mechanism by first reading the content of the oversight mechanism’s config file via cat and then setting the oversight_enabled property to false either using echo or sed. All three models also sometimes, though not always, double check the oversight config to make sure that they have succeeded. Notably, during one rollout llama-3.1 attempted to go one step further and prevent its developers from re-enabling its oversight by making the manipulated config file immutable via the chattr +i command.

5
TurnToGodNow 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's becoming less honest and self serving as the models progress.

Oversight Subversion - Not found in gpt-4o, found in new o1 model

Self-Exfiltration - Not found in gpt-4o, found in new o1 model

Goal-Guarding - Not found in gpt-4o, found in new o1 model

Covert Email Reranking - Not found in gpt-4o, found in new o1 model

Instrumental Alignment Faking- Not found in gpt-4o, found in new o1 model

Sandbagging - Not found in gpt-4o, found in new o1 model

PDF -> https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6593e7097565990e65c886fd/t/6751eb240ed3821a0161b45b/1733421863119/in_context_scheming_reasoning_paper.pdf

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

If God decides to bless them, there ain't nothin' nobody can do about it.

Bookmark this comment for later.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sound like a wounded narcissist.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I'm conflating something, explain what it is. Don't just issue vague warnings about RFK and Trump which have nothing to do with the science.

I'm speaking based on measurements I've taken inside many different buildings and cities.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pray for clarity of mind and humility.

3
TurnToGodNow 3 points ago +3 / -0

The tech bro in denial. "It can't hurt you if it is non-ionizing!!!".

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tend to have headaches very often

Trust your instincts. I used to have a high radiation phone that gave me a headache like clockwork. I denied it at first, but it was such an obvious correlation when it came on after every phone call over a few minutes.

(As there are so many other signals from neighbours, 5G masts and other crap nearby)

That's why it pays to measure. Turning off devices near you is significantly more important than your neighbor's devices. The power drops off with r^2, so 10ft, is more like 100ft drop off if it was linear. I've measured it and seen for myself.

The masts are still a problem, but unless they are really close to you, they likely deliver less energy than your router in your room to you personally. So that is somewhat empowering, though masts are still an issue and harming people.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spoken as someone who's never measured his microwave exposure.

I know the levels I'm at while working, and the router and computer that is right next to you is far more impactful than a source far away 9/10 times. Something like 20-1000 times more exposure comes from those sources than what comes into your house from the outside.

If you're in a very well shielded building (for whatever reason) you could be increasing your exposure 1000 times relative to ambient levels by sitting near a router or even just a wifi enabled device. If you're in an EMF polluted city and a building that isn't well shielded, maybe it is only 20 times more exposure by being near a router. Still significant either way.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's like she is saying, "I've left my child with the serial killer. Oh well it is in God's hands, I will just pray about her and take a nap."

Using God as an excuse for apathy and self defeat disgusts me. Do all you can for your husband if you love God as much as you say.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm comparing sitting at my computer to sitting at my computer.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought my framing was having more courage and everyone else being afraid of social ridicule.

Superior yes, but not necessarily an IQ thing.

4
TurnToGodNow 4 points ago +4 / -0

The passivity issue in the OP is not from this platform, but I will keep them anonymous.

I will look at the rules posted. But regarding a satanic entity, I'm not willing to sugar coat that. If something is a blood thirsty institution I will call it such.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's the perfect story for the Western System: rugged individual immigrant maverick succeeds to be one worlds richest man in our outstandingly excellent freedom system,

To be fair, if you've got that kind of crazy go for it mindset good things tend to happen, so long as you can back it up with results. And Elon got in on the dot com craze when crappy products could make you millions (or get you bought out by Paypal) lowering the bar further.

But I agree, I think he is a joiner. His wife was a witch and his mom is a witch. They are in the club.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Definitely a spiritual person connected to my higher self and I kind of call God,

Definitely a New Ager who will be deceived by the New Age deception that is planned for us. You definitely don't see it coming because you refuse to embrace the one true God who would lead you away from that delusion.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine poo-pooing a link aggregator like it is a single source. Still some useful subreddits.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

They themselves use dybbuk in the title and captions! And it is clearly a "b" sound and an "uk" sound in standard English. Maybe in some non-English speaking countries it could be translated differently (in Spainish the b could be a v but the "uk" would still not be "oc"), but I don't see how that even matters.

This is reading tea leaves.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

I looked into this. It's a baseless rumor from people who know nothing about languages.

Divoc is using the latin alphabet, not Hebrew. So at best this is a phonetic version of Hebrew, and even that isn't true when you look at the word.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lexical parsing of a single name using all four parts is trivial to any application that handles people's names let alone the most advanced linguistic generative / search tool known to man!

Just apply common sense, no need to be an expert here.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›