Ah, so you're in a cult. My point stands, this is not a religious discussion forum.
Cool, I'm sure there are similar groups for Hindus.
It can be whatever you want it to be. It's all made up anyway, just call yourself a prophet and start posting some shit online and maybe in a couple years or decades others will believe it too. Give it a few hundred years, you never know, maybe your contributions will make it into the canon long-term.
Or go find a bible study group, that seems a more appropriate forum than here.
Yikes! Sounds pretty irrational to my ears!
Could say the same about all the folks here from thedonald. But I don't think it's very useful to go around labeling everyone you don't agree with a shill (like they do at thedonald).
Wow I really touched a nerve, huh? You just commented like 10 times on this single thread.
Could you explain where you got that number from? With the official number of covid deaths in the US at around 340,000 (including gunshots, suicides, anal cancer and car wrecks) your claim would mean that 34 billion people have already survived it, several times the total number of humans on the planet let alone in America.
340,000 is about 1 in every 1000 Americans. That means that at best 1000 people survive for every 1 that dies, and that's only if every single American has already caught the virus.
The official death toll is certainly debatable for reasons you alluded to, among others, but if you're basing your argument on the official toll then you should check your math.
Yeah I agree.
Ah she's the founder of an organization called Fisher of Men Healing Ministry (which seems to be a popular name, I found at least 3 other seemingly unrelated non-profit religious orgs with the same name).
All communication between any individual and Rachel Celler carries privilege with respect to communication with clergy - Florida Statute 90.505.
Here's her site if you're interested in more: http://theforensicnurse.org
Edit: Some other domains aliased to her site: http://www.fisherofmenministries.org http://exposeevil.org
Maybe, possibly, he's just full of shit and has been getting all his info from thedonald.win
This is in preparation for a study to test the effects of the vaccine on fertility. I imagine they would recommend the same for ANY study that tested effects of ANYTHING on fertility.
Could the vaccine affect fertility? Yes. Does this in any way whatsoever demonstrate that it does? No.
If you're worried about it, wait for the results of the study to be published. Or simply don't get the vaccine. But this doesn't seem WTF.
Exactly, thanks for clarifying.
You can't buy an exception to the laws of physics.
Oh, I didn't realize people thought they were 100% effective. Even N99 masks only filter 99% of particles.
That may be, I was pointing out that it's strange that this study was brought up to support OP's statement that masks don't work, given that the study says the opposite. I didn't bring up this study, and I can't vouch for its accuracy.
ALL of them? Certainly some of them, but all seems a big overreach.
It's supposed to keep others healthy in the event you're carrying a virus, it's not intended to keep the wearer healthy.
Trading one lie for another. It's odd to see all the religious folks on a conspiracy forum, I expect such people to be more skeptical of things which can't be proven and which have been broadly pushed by powerful people and organizations for hundreds and thousands of years.
I think you greatly underestimate how large those craters are, it's a nice crisp moon photo but it doesn't come anywhere near the detail required to clearly show a human-scale object.
As others have pointed out to no avail, there are limitations of the laws of physics when it comes to the size lenses that would be required to do what you're suggesting.
Is there a higher rate of bacterial pneumonia historically for professions which wear masks regularly? Ex. medical professionals, construction workers
Seems like there should be historical data for at least some such occupations. Do you know of any such analysis?
Interesting source. Here are some of the actual conclusions of that study (direct quotes from the study itself):
Without a face mask, it is almost certain that many foreign droplets will transfer to the susceptible person. Wearing a mask will offer substantial, but not complete, protection to a susceptible person by decreasing the number of foreign airborne sneeze and cough droplets that would otherwise enter the person without the mask.
Therefore, both the virus carrier and the susceptible person could consider wearing a mask to reduce the transmission and spread of the virus.
Furthermore, depending on breathing comfort, wearing multiple layers of masks could offer increased protection.
This study, which can be treated as precautionary, provides quantitative support to the guidelines proposed by the medical research community that wearing a mask and avoiding close face-to-face or frontal interactions as much as possible will help in preventing the transmission and spreading of virus particles, such as COVID-19, through sneezes and coughs.
Here's a direct link to the study: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0035072
Nice deflection from the actual content of the post you're responding to. What are you quoting?