▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

The last thing I want to do is misrepresent anything.

If inferior morality is what determines if a person is subhuman then the line would be drawn between those who commit immoral acts and those who don't. But it seems to me that in your view all Jews are subhuman. Therefore, my conclusion is that morality is not the defining trait, but ethnicity is.

Arguments that a particular group are subhuman go back far in history and continue today.

'Less Than Human': The Psychology Of Cruelty https://www.npr.org/2011/03/29/134956180/criminals-see-their-victims-as-less-than-human?t=1626945305088

During the Holocaust, Nazis referred to Jews as rats. Hutus involved in the Rwanda genocide called Tutsis cockroaches. Slave owners throughout history considered slaves subhuman animals.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure. Sorry for misunderstanding your meaning of the word "real."

In any case, black projects don't prove Bigfoot's existence.

There's no reason to "discredit" most of the other stuff you wrote; it's interesting. I'd like to learn more about great leaps in certain technologies that coincide.

As for Lazar, all he needed was some evidence. Him lying wouldn't necessarily make him a disinformation agent, but there is a lot out there that does confuse the issue, and some of it is deliberate for sure. Not because they are necessarily covering up the existence of an extraterrestrial presence, but to simply have it an open question.

▲ 4 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 4 points ago +4 / -0

This sort of thing is the actual cause of all the flooding. They are falsely blaming climate change.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

They do this in many places for agriculture. That's why we've got the flooding. It's not due to climate change.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have a false premise and your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises. For our purposes, UFOs being real means they are of extraterrestrial origin.

P1: Many people claim to have seen UFOs and are not believed. True

P2: Many people claim to have seen Bigfoot and are not believed. True

P3: The United States government says that UFOs are real. False

C1: If the United States government says that UFOs are real, then UFOs are real. False

C2: If UFOs are real, then the UFO sightings must be legitimate. False

C3: If the UFO sightings are legitimate, then the Bigfoot sightings must be legitimate. False

What happens when you apply this to other cryptozoological phenomena? You have just proved the existence of the Loch Ness Monster, mermaids, ghosts and chupacabras.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

No worries. I know a guy who shouts at homeless people out of his car window in the middle of the night telling them to get a job.

I believe in capitalism, but these days it is being deliberately stymied in regard to the working class to make them poorer, concentrate wealth (and the political power that comes with when the government is corrupt), and build a case for implementing the China Model.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

None of this shows how Bigfoot would be real if the government admitted UFOs are real.

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don't need to know anything to be a rubber stamp.

▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

The title of this post is misleading. A reasonable person would not say the capital was "stormed." Even the article you linked from this trash news source calls the event an "insurrection", which is outrageous in my view.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judaism is all about how a jew is superior to all non jews...

If that were true, of course they would be wrong. Having a particular ethnicity does not determine superiority/inferiority. I agree: that entire concept is repugnant.

...a jew is fundamentally sub human...

Facepalm.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it's a concerted effort then of course the perpetrators are to blame and not natural selection. It's like blaming AI for a planned takedown of the middle class.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only those who...

That's a quote from you.

And no, not triggered.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

For anyone else interested, 1984 is very thought provoking. I think it's a must-read.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let me explain to you why "you are defending X" does not mean anything.

Take Bill Gates. What if I said "Bill Gates stole the Mona Lisa"? You could then rightly respond, "There is no evidence that Bill Gates stole the Mona Lisa." Would me asking you why you are defending him be a meaningful question?

The same applies here. You quoted something that had already been retracted as a mistake. It is completely appropriate to point this out so that others have more context and can make better conclusions. The subject matter or who was being quoted is irrelevant.

Incidentally, I don't think my reply came of as particularly "eager", as you put it.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have non-official covert "journalists" by the thousands. No need for Hannity.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does not appear that this exercise has anything to do with flagging accounts.

by pkvi
▲ 10 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 10 points ago +10 / -0

For anyone wondering, that's a CIA pin on his lapel.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm curious what you mean. Are you implying that people are deliberately killing off certain segments of the population? If so, we mustn't allow them to avoid blame by citing evolution.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

People are dying from the flu. Coronavirus is completely different.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could have sworn I said goodbye to you.

In any case, since you've devolved into simply attacking me personally...

On me being a pedophile or a pedophile sympathizer:

Pedophilic Disorder DSM-5 302.2 (F65.4) https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/pedophilic-disorder-dsm--5-302.2-(f65.4) Pedophilic Disorder is a DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition), diagnosis assigned to adults ( defined as age 16 and up) who have sexual desire for prepubescent children (American Psychiatric Association, 2013a).

Your narrative has neither a prepubescent child nor evidence of sexual activity. Given that, you couldn't be more fundamentally wrong in your accusations?

My opinion (whatever it may be) about people meeting at parties in the 1950s doesn't enable anything. Your assertion that the father was somehow able to give legal consent for his daughter to have sex is laughable, but I think we all know now that you are intending to entertain people.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think so. There is an organized effort to have us seen as "conspiratards." They tirelessly try to make questioning official narratives appear foolish.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/conspiratard

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is not a dumb policy; read the article.

COVID: Entrance of vaccinated to Israel postponed again amid outbreak https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/coronavirus-in-israel-430-new-cases-147-percent-of-tests-positive-674215

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›