▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

The answer is because calling all whites racist is just as wrong as calling all Muslims extremist.

Parag Agrawal is the new CEO of Twitter.

Parag Agrawal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parag_Agrawal

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not important; I don't claim to like this guy. I think people should see that the virus did not come from eating bats in the same city as the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

The original seems to have been deleted because of the personal information that was on the card.

EDIT: Someone pointed out that it could also instruct people on how to make legitimate-looking fakes by following how it was filled out.

The Reddit user stlredbird claims this is a doctored image:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LouderWithCrowder/comments/r5mb2s/an_ideology_so_toxic_that_it_can_overpower_how_a/hmq6lp5/?context=3

Another Reddit thread claiming to show the original image. The text is completely different.:

https://www.reddit.com/r/walkaway/comments/r36fmi/comment/hmq7u2x/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

▲ 8 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 8 points ago +8 / -0

What they want people to believe is that without the shot a person is more likely to produce variants and spread them to others. The opposite is true. They want to appeal to a sense of duty to help others. It's just that they don't think the average person can comprehend the danger they pose to others simply by having severe symptoms at the same time as many other people with severe symptoms. Instead, they are trying to convince people that the unjabbed will infect others when in fact it is the unjabbed who will suffer the bad cases of COVID-19. What they want to avoid is the situation where the health system is overloaded, thereby causing people to die from lack of care.

Although they mean well, what this means is that deadlier and deadlier variants could be transmitted by people who have gotten all their shots. When we see variants with large numbers of mutations, what it means is that it was able to go from person to person to rack up that high number. Once a deadly mutation happens, the host dies. That means that it is unlikely for that variant to spread to others and survive. It may kill more than one person, but the R rate will be much lower than 1, so it goes extinct.

So the situation they have deliberately created is one where a deadly variant will emerge and be spread by people who--because of taking the shots--will not quickly die from it. The R rate will be higher than 1, because symptoms will also take longer to emerge than in the non-jabbed. It will then go on to ravage people who have not gotten their shots with a massive death rate.

While I think big pharma is in it for money, some groups want to weaponize this by going after targeted groups: the developing world, right wingers, nationalists, and in China, pro-Democracy activists.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

But where people lose interest in doing it after a while a bot never does.

I think that people believing they are talking to robots is what makes them lose interest. See how they get the message out that these shills are really just an AI?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I couldn't find it.

Anyway, I was talking mostly about government/political propaganda, fake news, etc.

▲ 5 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 5 points ago +5 / -0

Misleading title:

By using the word "planes" you make it sound like this happened more than once.

By using the phrase "reveals in stunning testimony" you make it sound like we did not know he took a flight from Florida to Newark, New Jersey.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Despite Trump literally owning a pageant to display underage girls to potential buyers/sex traffickers.

Why do you believe this?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the vast majority of shill accounts are under the control of people. Lots of it is automated, but it's not like an army of robots or something.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

In larger numbers, yes. It's the Deep State that is "voting harder" i.e. cheating.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you think there could be a .win community devoted to deconstructing propaganda?

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

People naively believed that there would be nothing they could do about it or they would allow it to happen without a fight.

▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

If that was before her incarceration--and by extension before anyone was able to connect the inactivity to it--it may be that Palafranco knows her.

Were there rumours about the account belonging to her before she was sent to jail?

Is it possible to find out who that Palafranco is? Is the account still active?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're replying to someone's antisemitic rant.

Election theft requires only a small number of people, as can be seen in nation after nation.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

That kind of water supply poisoning is infeasible, and your bottled water idea won't work under those circumstances. People would make their own water while the entire planet crashes.

Besides, the virus itself will depopulate the world once it mutates to be deadly to people who didn't get the "vaxx."

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for pointing out the organized censorship. If this were any other topic, it would be seen as a funny joke by bored workers or possibly a commentary on working conditions. Since they politicized the shots, they have to manage what people see about it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›