If they are engaged in gain of function work of any kind - yes. GoF work is quite literally the the development of bioweapons and that is why it’s illegal in the US. If these theoretical labs you speak of are funded by the US and engaged in GoF it’s cut and dried 100% intentional biological warfare.
It is clear to me now this was the reason behind all the Russia-gate crap. 5 years of smearing Russia as liars who colluded to steal an election all to brainwash the normie class into never believing a single thing coming from Russia.
The Russia-gate narrative was never about Trump, our government-media complex simply used him as the reason to vilify Russia because they knew this day was coming. Likely they thought it was going to happen during Trump’s term because he wasn’t in on the scheme and was on relatively friendly terms with Putin. I have to wonder if Putin knew about these labs during Trump’s term but waited until the establishment was back in control to expose them? Maybe that’s a stretch ha.
Isn’t Ukraine one of the poorest and most corrupt eastern european countries? If yes, it makes sense to me that they would allow these biolabs in exchange for cash money from the US and possibly other countries. Likely the entire purpose of the labs was gain of function work and their government was able to charge the US through the nose for this work. Sadly if this theory is correct you can see that the money did not go toward bettering Ukraine for their citizens, it went to enriching corrupt politicians. Just like in the US.
or is it just shitty cheap flags from China? I’ve never seen anything like it.
Found in this vid at about 0:50 https://youtu.be/LJNtfyq3TDE
I think you’re likely right that it’s too early to say there is a link here but food for thought:
-
cancer is a genetic disease meaning that basically cancer forms when there are certain changes to certain genes, particularly how they divide.
-
these “vaccines” are not vaccines as we have come to understand them, they are in fact gene therapy that alters the recipients genes
-
i’m not a doctor but is it a far cry to speculate that altering ones genes with gene therapy could in fact cause cancer as an outcome? what if the patients already had small amounts of treatable cancer that went absolutely wild post-gene-therapy?
Thing is, we literally don’t know the answers to point #3 because all the animal trials in the past for the mRNA platform ended in all the animal test subjects dying before the trials could complete. What did they die of? Does anyone know? There isn’t any long term safety data at all.
The people mandating them need to be hung publicly.
My point is that i have serious doubts they'll ever get to a ratio of 80/20 actually vaxxed in most nations. The media will most certainly try to astroturf that there are 80% vaxxed, however. My hope is that enough people aren't dumb enough to fall for it.
its not 80% that are vaxxed, not even close. In Australia I saw that the vaxxed rate is less than 20% and that is the number that is being used in the media. We know the media lies, no reason to believe any numbers they spew. I won't be surprised if the real number of Americans currently vaxxed is less than 40%.
Dammit, Janet, stop noticing things. Very anti Semitic of her.