And what I am saying is that it doesn't matter what shape the earth is. As it does not change your actual daily life.
Solpsism does not change nor negate the existence of an objective reality. It just means you can not prove it conclusively.
You have asked an invalid Question.
Regardless to the shape of the Earth. There are still people outside your known borders who control your life.
https://patriots.win/p/16b5zaa3rF/tucker-no-one-cares-if-youre-a-f/c/
Oh.. Um. Ignore that other reply. What I meant to say was... i had a few different replies. i did address the question in the title.
No that's not it... Would you believe; I answered all of your Questions elsewhere! You're just not keeping up! Because of my big brain and stuff.
Personal note: That'll shut him up. leave him scrambling about this thread for hours, and then I'll come back and give a one or two word reply. Probably an insult about his mother.
You have made far too may assumptions, on far too many levels. Scientifically, grammatically, your use of etiquette, and of the meta commentary employed.
I just expect more from people. when i see questions like yours, it means you have put zero effort into researching what FE model is. No one thinks earth is a flat planet, thats stupid.
Try addressing Questions from a more objective stance.
Inject or even start out with your own beliefs on topics so that other may understand your base assumptions.
Pick a tone.
State your objectives and objections openly.
As it stands, what you are doing here is muddy and aimless. Unfocused even.
Do try harder please. And stop languishing in your own disappointment. It's miserable. You bring misery.
wow. You watched that whole five hour video already?
I'm impressed.
Earth has zero curve. it cannot be in a crater on a large planet because we can see that there is no curve,
Well I can't argue against that. As your statements are not based on anything, therefore, I literally can not debate them. They don't even act to prove anything. You have simply stated them as fact when they are not.
OK. I'll take a stab at it none the less. The maximum visibility with landmarks such as mountains is 150 miles. Yet in reality, I have never viewed anything more than 50 miles out, 10 in my local area. Which in fact, proves nothing conclusively either way.
take a stance, prove something if you can, or just accept that FE is just a superior explanation for all that we observe.
I can't tell if you are contradicting what you have just said, or being metaphorical.
Either way, you are tripping balls my man. That and have taken far too many drama lessons.
I have no idea what it is you wished to have expressed upon me. None what so ever.
She is a handled asset for the WEF. Calling her a swap rat, muddies the water on who is in charge, and is ultimately responsible.
You don't actually have a list of other 'swamp rats' do you?
What you have is a catchy title, and nothing more.
2020 was a very good year for me...
???
I'm going to need for you to try a whole lot harder than this.
What Questions am I allowed to ask without shame?
Can you direct me to the authority who decides this?
Is it you?....
Oh I see the problem. My submission statesmen was down voted, so you have no point of reference for what the Question actually means.
https://conspiracies.win/p/16b5lULSJF/x/c/4TsavcOyx4q
Clearly you do not mean to appear as a forum gate keeper and bully suppressing free thought with basic insults and intimidation tactics.
You are here to help me?
You are using the words 'simp' and 'lol' ironically, and not as a true phone-tard twiddling your thumbs at your corporate owned personal device and tracker.
You are a good man.
Maybe you should have started by addressing my submission statement in this thread before replying to a Question you do not understand?
https://conspiracies.win/p/16b5lULSJF/x/c/4TsavcOyx4q
Because your reply doesn't address that, or the Question in the title. Nor the image, which is of a crater Earth model presenting a livable zone on a massive planet.
Your point of reference is magnetic north. On both a sphere, and an flat surface, or larger sphere, this leaves you circling your point of reference that you derive all your further calculations from.
You wouldn't be drawing from real surface area calculations, since you have no way of making said calculations. For this world. A world we have never received any actual photos of from space.
In addition, your link simply takes us to math lessons. Which in no way address the assertion in your reply. As it is simply math exercises, and not a rebuttal of any form.
Surface area worksheets comprise an enormous collection of exercises on different solid figures.
???
Was I not supposed to read any of it? Was I to simply be taken in by the colorful presentation of a child's lesson, and assume failing on my part?
Amazing. Do they think it takes this much symbolism on display to become a person?
I would have gone with a solid tie, and not striped.
You are now sober.
These aren't even mutually exclusive concepts.
You addressed nothing that I said.
That was just weird.
You be the judge.
Well I did. And you freaked out, because I did the thing you asked me to do in your title.
...Again. Really weird.
I'm accusing you of using ChatGPT between your less lucid periods of intoxication and bouts of unrestrained rage. That would be the point of reading my messages. Which in no way carry a political message, but instead carry a personal one, on your failings to utilize a public forum about corruption, properly.
Oh I mean... TAKE THAT YOU NAZI!!!
/s (that what you want? Is that what you needed here? Are we done?)
You seemed to have crafted an entire narrative on who I am within your mind. And then proceeded to talk down to me, calling me an idiot and a liar.
Why? There was no cause for that.
I like that one. It shows that you don't use arguments to make conclusions.
I can literally say the very same of that very sentence. This is meaningless. Why didn't you bolster you theories instead? Why turn to name calling?
I like to study your behavior.
Have you even clicked on my name? Has your research on me even gone far enough to delve into my recent submissions and replies? I don't think they have. I don't think you're actually doing as you claim you are.
Now back on topic. I can assure you Sir, that cautionary tales exist. They date back to before the dawn of pictography, and man could only point and grunt at danger.
Is there something to argue here? I don't think there is. Please inform me, of how that my basic assertion is in error.
The vaccines at the time caused the Spanish flu, it wasn't a vaccine FOR the Spanish flu.
Nowhere in the original post does he make a claim that there was a vaccine FOR the Spanish flu.
OK. So just go and ask ChatGPT the following Question:
What is the Blade Runner Voight-Kampff Test?
And then come back here and cut and paste it's reply into the window. Which doesn't match your current demeanor. Kind of like all your posts today. For some reason.
Eat shit lefty, not gonna load some lame link.
Stay classy, you low effort drunk!
BAC: 0.253%
You will be completely sober in: 17 hours 58 minutes
You haven't even grounded this in a hypothetical.
It's two stawmen, doing a he said, she said, with a conclusive statement of 'someone' being wrong.
Allow me to reorder your thoughts:
One labels others to more easily disregard their statements without review of the contents of their words.
No, again you simply are reading too much into it,
So, I am reading too much into the rhetorical Question of which you left open for interpretation? Got it.
There is no need to respond at all.
Then there is no need to participate in, or up vote this content.
As for my last Question. I'm literally asking you how much you've had to drink tonight.
Right. So you envision people who identify as 'shills wearing woman's face' to answer this, and everyone else to ignore it.
Sir, have you been drinking tonight?
A "serious Question". One that we have no way of deriving an answer for, that will in effect prove nothing?
sentences.
Not really. I just see it as unfocused.