You know these guys and their hard-on with the all seeing eye. lol.
He's also seated like him. You can see a bit of his hoof pointing out too.
How's that grab ya? lol
And then if you go above his head.. it's the flame point, the middle of the dome. lol
I don't know.. I've seen this type of formation somewhere.. maybe like the pics with the firmament or something.. and sheol below.
I saw this before lemme get that.. Masonic & Occult Symbols Illust - Dr. Cathy Burns pdf. It's like one triangle going into another.
While I'm scrolling this.. the title name Dan Brown's lost symbol series I'm watching.. the O in the letters has a dot in the middle. Just check that book pdf the other day to see about that o with the dot.
The two triangles.
THE HEXAGRAM The Hexagram is formed by uniting the Water Triangle with the Fire Triangle, which is called the Six-pointed Star, Star of David, Solomon’s Seal, etc. When the two triangles (the “Water Triangle” and the “Fire Triangle”) are joined together into one symbol, it forms a six pointed star known as a double triangle, hexagram, Crest of Solomon, star of the microcosm and the Shield of David, among other names. It is even called the “talisman of Saturn.” Mary Ann Slipper remarks: “This six pointed star is used in masonic work and is also found in other well known secret orders.” The Second Mile, an Eastern Star book, reveals that the “six pointed star is a very ancient symbol, and one of the most powerful.” It sure is a powerful symbol—to witches, sorcerers, and magicians! “The hexagram is used in magic, witchcraft, occultism and the casting of zodiacal horoscopes internationally and by all races.” “It was considered to possess mysterious powers,” says A Concise Cyclopaedia of Freemasonry. It is used as a “stand-by for MAGICIANS AND ALCHEMISTS. The SORCERERS believed it represented the footprint of a special kind of DEMON called a trud and used it in ceremonies both to CALL UP DEMONS and to keep them away.” Former Satanist, Bill Schnoebelen, reminds us: “To the sorcerer, the hexagram is a powerful tool to invoke Satan....” A HEXAGRAM MUST BE PRESENT TO CALL A DEMON FORTH. In fact, the word “HEX” comes from this emblem.
See that other post analyzing the Analyzing Apotheosis of Washington. Couple other versions where one of the angle chicks bringing him up.. the top one she's got this star of david on her forehead. How about that movie the other week.. the devil rides out.. where intro sequence one shot he's got the star of david on his forehead instead of the usual pentagram. These occult guys are into this. lol.
Six groups of figures line the perimeter of the canopy; the following list begins below the central group and proceeds clockwise:
War, with Armed Freedom and the eagle defeating Tyranny and Kingly Power
Science, with Minerva teaching Benjamin Franklin, Robert Fulton, and Samuel F.B. Morse
Marine, with Neptune holding his trident and Venus holding the transatlantic cable, which was being laid at the time the fresco was painted
Commerce, with Mercury handing a bag of money to Robert Morris, financier of the American Revolution
Mechanics, with Vulcan at the anvil and forge, producing a cannon and a steam engine
Agriculture, with Ceres seated on the McCormick Reaper, accompanied by America in a red liberty cap and Flora picking flowers.
Kind of looks like an eye or something.. if you'd cut it in the middle.
Oculus (a term from Latin oculus, meaning 'eye'),
All seeing eye.
"The Apotheosis of Washington in the eye of the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol."
Watched the 3 Da Vinci code movies. Looking up the author, starting to watch this series, The Lost Symbol (TV Series 2021). On Peacock network. They did 10 episodes, 1 season then it got cancelled. We got some new dude trying to do the Tom Hanks. I'm up to episode 3. In the title sequence they got this dome. I'm there.. gonna be something with this art. Looking at it. Those angel figures with Washington, it's not a circle, more of a triangle. The top of it is the Commerce section. Those are the methods they railroad us by.
E pluribus unum
"out of many, one (the motto of the US)." Lucifer, the all seeing eye. lol. I don't know, you guys analyze this stuff. lol
well how come you're getting that file with the bloodlines family tree.. this isn't bullshit, man. Lemme get that again.
https://media.scored.co/post/FtZXQiQCbxw5.jpeg
You want "editing" out of shit.. go see the real bible. lol. Here's that segment from da vinci code about them editing out shit. Like come on.
709
01:01:29,391 --> 01:01:33,228
The Good Book did not arrive by facsimile from heaven.
The Bible as we know it was finally presided over by one man:
The pagan emperor Constantine.
I thought Constantine was a Christian.
Oh, hardly, no. He was a lifelong pagan...
...who was baptized on his deathbed.
Constantine was Rome's supreme holy man.
From time immemorial...
...his people had worshiped a balance between nature's male deities...
...and the goddess, or sacred feminine.
But a growing religious turmoil was gripping Rome.
Three centuries earlier...
...a young Jew named Jesus had come along...
...preaching love and a single God.
Centuries after his crucifixion...
...Christ's followers had grown exponentially...
...and had started a religious war against the pagans.
Or did the pagans commence war against the Christians?
Leigh, we can't be sure who began the atrocities in that period.
We can at least agree that the conflict grew to such proportions...
...that it threatened to tear Rome in two.
So Constantine may have been a lifelong pagan...
...but he was also a pragmatist.
And in 325 anno Domini...
...he decided to unify Rome under a single religion, Christianity.
Christianity was on the rise. He didn't want his empire torn apart.
And to strengthen this new Christian tradition...
...Constantine held a famous ecumenical gathering...
...known as the Council of Nicaea.
And at this council...
...the many sects of Christianity debated and voted on, well...
...everything, from the acceptance and rejection of specific gospels...
...to the date for Easter...
...to the administering of the sacraments, and of course...
...the immortality of Jesus.
I don't follow.
Well, ma chère, until that moment in history...
...Jesus was viewed by many of his followers as a mighty prophet...
...as a great and powerful man, but a man nevertheless.
A mortal man.
Not the Son of God?
Not even his nephew twice removed.
Constantine did not create Jesus' divinity.
He simply sanctioned an already widely held idea.
Semantics. No, it's not semantics. You're interpreting facts to support your own conclusions.
Fact: For many Christians, Jesus was mortal one day and divine the next.
For some Christians, his divinity was enhanced.
Absurd. There was a formal announcement of his promotion.
They couldn't even agree on the Nicene Creed!
Excuse me. "Who is God, who is man?"
How many have been murdered over this question?
As long as there has been a one true God...
...there has been killing in his name.
so it's like the ra material? any word on who did all this.. cause this epic. The ra material if you look at the original transcribing.. fuck was she slow.. like a few words every moment. This 1000 page urantia.. like what's the data transfer rate, eh?
yeah yahweh was more involved back in those days, eh.. how about the who knows what cultures like the greeks with these big gods.. who knows what the hell went on back then ok. I think they shut 'er down with any of that supernatural type shit where those who knows what beings would step on in. Who knows about aliens from other places stopping in. I betcha in like native culture stories you got some of that, ok. There's a super clamp-down on planet earth where, no fuckin around with funny business, eh. Betcha they even somehow, lol.. "hoodwinked" yahweh himself, eh? Why's he not stepping in like those days. The US military and their fucking AI shit nailed his ass, I bet, eh?
how come they got all this Melchizedek on the right hand side there.. these guys writing this early shit?
And what's this Melchizedek I keep seeing.. didn't we get into that where it was like some priest in the Raiders of the lost ark movie. Lemme just paste that in and see if it brings up that dude with the gem stone breast plate outfit. lol. yeah that's him.. what the fuck's this shit got to do with this.. I don't know I guess I'll see. Jeez.. like who's got a fucking decade to do nothing with their spare time but read this book that's probably like a foot thick if you'd print it. Lemme see if they got this shit printed and how thick the bitch would be.. like come on. lol. People aren't really into this shit.. a first edition 1955 isn't costing that much. lol. ok I gotta go. lol
But yeah.. I remember The Lucifer Rebellion. Got this pdf on my desktop.. gonna check that section out again. Should be interesting. I betcha this whole Urantia book version here they did that cause those roman catholic or whoever else they edit shit out, eh. But chatGPT said there's nothing in the Urantia book about him shagging that mary magdalene and doing this bloodline stuff.. so that kind of stinks. We'll see what we got here.. but this fucking urantia book there.. fuck is this shit thick.. like who's got a fucking decade of all your spare time to analyze this shit.. you know what I mean. But I'll go check that lucifer rebellion section. This shit was pretty fucking groovy when I kinda tried to go through it.. but it was fucking "heavy" man.. like you really gotta concentrate on what they're trying to talk about. lol. When I got to that jesus section I was like.. fuck this shit man and sacked it. lol.
[part 2 of 2] lol
User
well they're both talking about this jesus dude.. so cough it up.. you know the urantia doesn't fuck around.. so betcha there's stuff that's in there, that the roman catholic bible edited out. Whatcha got on that.
ChatGPT
While The Urantia Book and the traditional Roman Catholic Bible both feature narratives related to the life and teachings of Jesus, it's important to reiterate that they are fundamentally different texts representing different religious perspectives. The Roman Catholic Bible is a compilation of canonical texts that have been central to Christian tradition for centuries, while The Urantia Book is a distinct religious text with its own unique teachings.
There isn't a direct comparison of content that was "edited out" of the Roman Catholic Bible and included in The Urantia Book because they have distinct origins and purposes. The Roman Catholic Bible contains texts that have been accepted by the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations, while The Urantia Book represents the beliefs of the Urantia Fellowship.
Some differences between The Urantia Book and the Roman Catholic Bible include:
Teachings and Perspectives: The Urantia Book offers a unique interpretation of the life and teachings of Jesus, often emphasizing spiritual concepts and a cosmic perspective. These interpretations may differ from the traditional Christian understanding found in the Bible.
Additional Teachings: The Urantia Book contains teachings attributed to Jesus that are not found in the canonical Gospels of the Bible. These teachings are presented in a different context and with a different emphasis.
Cosmic Framework: The Urantia Book places Jesus within a broader cosmic framework, discussing his role in the universe and the spiritual hierarchy of beings, which is not a focus of the traditional Christian Bible.
It's important to approach both texts with an open and respectful attitude, recognizing that they represent the beliefs of different religious traditions. If you are interested in understanding the specific teachings and perspectives found in The Urantia Book, I recommend reading the book itself or seeking guidance from individuals or communities who follow its teachings. However, it's not accurate to view The Urantia Book as containing content that was intentionally "edited out" of the Roman Catholic Bible, as they have different origins and purposes.
User
i think it's just too much text to analyze and you can't handle it, eh? like I got the pdf here of this urantia book and it's fucking 4432 pages. The jesus stuff starts at page 2811. So you're overloaded, eh?
ChatGPT
I apologize if my previous responses did not fully address your specific questions. Indeed, The Urantia Book is a lengthy text with a complex narrative. I'm here to provide information and insights to the best of my abilities, but it can be challenging to cover such a vast amount of content comprehensively in a single conversation.
If you have specific questions or topics you'd like to explore further within The Urantia Book or any other subject, please feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to provide you with relevant information and insights.
User
well quit fucking around.. analyze what's in the urantia book jesus section that the roman catholic bible is editing out
ChatGPT
I apologize for any confusion, but I don't have the ability to directly compare specific passages from The Urantia Book with the Roman Catholic Bible, as I don't have access to the full content of The Urantia Book, and my training data only includes information up until September 2021. Additionally, the comparison you're asking for would require an extensive analysis of both texts, which is beyond the scope of this text-based interface.
However, I can provide some general insights about what makes The Urantia Book different from traditional Christian teachings based on the Bible:
Unique Teachings: The Urantia Book contains teachings and narratives about Jesus that are not found in the canonical Gospels of the Bible. These teachings often emphasize spiritual and cosmic concepts, presenting a distinct interpretation of Jesus' life and mission.
Cosmic Framework: The Urantia Book places Jesus within a broader cosmic framework, discussing his role in the universe and the spiritual hierarchy of beings, which is not a focus of traditional Christian texts.
Emphasis on Spiritual Growth: The book often emphasizes personal spiritual growth and the relationship between individuals and God, presenting teachings that may differ in emphasis from traditional Christian doctrine.
Additional Narratives: The Urantia Book includes narratives and stories that are not part of the traditional Christian Bible, offering a unique perspective on the life of Jesus and other spiritual topics.
It's important to note that The Urantia Book is not considered part of mainstream Christian theology or accepted by most Christian denominations. It represents the beliefs of the Urantia Fellowship, a specific religious group.
If you have specific questions about the content of The Urantia Book or would like to discuss particular teachings or narratives found within it, I recommend consulting the book itself or seeking guidance from individuals or communities who follow its teachings, as they would be more knowledgeable about its content and interpretations.
User
i guess that's all ya got eh.. ok. lol
ChatGPT
I apologize if I couldn't provide more specific details regarding the content of The Urantia Book and its comparison to the Roman Catholic Bible. If you have any more questions in the future or need information on any other topics, please don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to assist you to the best of my abilities.
[part 1 of 2] lol
User
the uratia book.. this 36% of it being the story of Jesus.. does it talk about if he was shagging that girlfriend of his in this book?
ChatGPT
The Urantia Book is a religious text that presents a unique cosmology, philosophy, and spiritual teachings. It does include a narrative about the life and teachings of Jesus, but it is written in a way that focuses on his spiritual and religious message rather than details of his personal life or relationships. The book emphasizes Jesus' teachings, his role as a spiritual leader, and his contributions to the development of religious thought.
The Urantia Book is not a historical or biographical account of Jesus in the same way that some other texts may be, and it does not delve into speculative or sensationalized details about his personal life or relationships. Instead, it seeks to provide a comprehensive spiritual and philosophical perspective.
If you have specific questions about the content of The Urantia Book or its teachings, I recommend consulting the book itself or seeking guidance from individuals or communities familiar with its interpretations and teachings.
User
it doesn't talk about this chick he got the bloodline with, that you don't get in the roman catholic version of the bible?
ChatGPT
The concept of a "bloodline" or a romantic relationship for Jesus is not a part of traditional Christian theology as found in the Bible or in mainstream Christian beliefs. The Urantia Book, as mentioned earlier, presents a unique perspective on the life and teachings of Jesus, focusing more on his spiritual and religious message.
It's important to note that beliefs about Jesus and his life can vary widely among different religious and spiritual traditions. However, mainstream Christianity, including the Roman Catholic Church, does not teach or endorse the idea of Jesus having a romantic relationship or a "bloodline" in the sense of descendants.
If you're interested in specific claims or narratives related to Jesus outside of mainstream Christian teachings, you may need to explore alternative or non-canonical texts, but it's essential to approach such sources with critical thinking and an understanding of their historical and theological context.
User
you know what i'm talking about that chick he was shagging.. i think it was mary magdalene. lol
ChatGPT
The idea of Jesus having a romantic or sexual relationship with Mary Magdalene is a topic that has been explored in various works of fiction, literature, and alternative historical theories, most notably popularized in Dan Brown's novel "The Da Vinci Code." However, it's important to clarify that these ideas are not part of mainstream Christian theology or supported by historical evidence found in the New Testament or other credible historical sources.
In the New Testament, Mary Magdalene is portrayed as a follower of Jesus and one of the women who witnessed his crucifixion and resurrection. She is not described as Jesus' romantic partner in the biblical texts.
The notion of a romantic relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene is a speculative and fictional interpretation that has been the subject of debate and controversy but is not grounded in historical or biblical accounts. It's essential to distinguish between religious or theological beliefs and speculative interpretations or works of fiction when discussing such topics.
User
you also got this file.. Bloodline of the holy grail where they get into this eh.. like the family tree..
ChatGPT
The idea of a "Bloodline of the Holy Grail" has been explored in various works of fiction and alternative historical theories, most notably in books like "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln, and as I mentioned earlier, in Dan Brown's novel "The Da Vinci Code."
These works propose the theory that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had descendants, and their bloodline continued through the ages, leading to the creation of secret societies that guarded this lineage. These theories, however, are not based on historical evidence supported by mainstream historical or religious scholarship.
It's important to understand that these ideas are considered speculative and are not part of mainstream Christian theology or accepted historical accounts. They are often presented as works of historical fiction or conspiracy theories. While they can be intriguing and entertaining to explore in literature and fiction, they should not be taken as established historical facts.
If you are interested in learning more about these theories, you can certainly read the books you mentioned, but it's crucial to approach them with a critical and discerning mindset, recognizing that they do not represent mainstream historical or religious consensus.
User
well the roman catholic bible.. sounds like they were editing out stuff.. in da vinci code.. the transcript says
835
01:08:56,797 --> 01:09:00,008
Now, listen to this. It's from the Gospel according to Philip.
Philip?
Yes, it was rejected at the Council of Nicaea...
...along with any other gospels that made...
...Jesus appear human and not divine.
Was also this other section..
709
01:01:29,391 --> 01:01:33,228
The Good Book did not arrive by facsimile from heaven.
The Bible as we know it was finally presided over by one man:
The pagan emperor Constantine.
I thought Constantine was a Christian.
Oh, hardly, no. He was a lifelong pagan...
...who was baptized on his deathbed.
Constantine was Rome's supreme holy man.
From time immemorial...
...his people had worshiped a balance between nature's male deities...
...and the goddess, or sacred feminine.
But a growing religious turmoil was gripping Rome.
Three centuries earlier...
...a young Jew named Jesus had come along...
...preaching love and a single God.
Centuries after his crucifixion...
...Christ's followers had grown exponentially...
...and had started a religious war against the pagans.
Or did the pagans commence war against the Christians?
Leigh, we can't be sure who began the atrocities in that period.
We can at least agree that the conflict grew to such proportions...
...that it threatened to tear Rome in two.
So Constantine may have been a lifelong pagan...
...but he was also a pragmatist.
And in 325 anno Domini...
...he decided to unify Rome under a single religion, Christianity.
Christianity was on the rise. He didn't want his empire torn apart.
And to strengthen this new Christian tradition...
...Constantine held a famous ecumenical gathering...
...known as the Council of Nicaea.
And at this council...
...the many sects of Christianity debated and voted on, well...
...everything, from the acceptance and rejection of specific gospels...
...to the date for Easter...
...to the administering of the sacraments, and of course...
...the immortality of Jesus.
I don't follow.
Well, ma chère, until that moment in history...
...Jesus was viewed by many of his followers as a mighty prophet...
...as a great and powerful man, but a man nevertheless.
A mortal man.
Not the Son of God?
Not even his nephew twice removed.
Constantine did not create Jesus' divinity.
He simply sanctioned an already widely held idea.
Semantics. No, it's not semantics. You're interpreting facts to support your own conclusions.
Fact: For many Christians, Jesus was mortal one day and divine the next.
For some Christians, his divinity was enhanced.
Absurd. There was a formal announcement of his promotion.
They couldn't even agree on the Nicene Creed!
Excuse me. "Who is God, who is man?"
How many have been murdered over this question?
As long as there has been a one true God...
...there has been killing in his name.
So you're getting these roman catholic guys editing out the bible, eh. I wondered.. like what's up with the Uratia version.. cause they get into pretty whacked out stuff before they get into the Jesus thing, eh.
Whatcha got on things with the Jesus section of Uratia, which are containing things that got weeded out with the Roman catholic version of the bible.
You said the urantia doesn't get into how jesus was shagging mary magdalene.. so I guess that ain't in there. Whatcha got on stuff that's in the urantia book jesus section which they weeded out of the roman catholic version of the bible.
ChatGPT
The Urantia Book is a unique religious text that presents a distinct perspective on various aspects of spirituality and cosmology, including the life and teachings of Jesus. While it offers an expansive narrative about Jesus and his teachings, it's essential to clarify that The Urantia Book is not considered part of mainstream Christian theology or biblical canon. Instead, it represents the beliefs of a small religious movement known as the Urantia Fellowship.
The Urantia Book provides a detailed account of Jesus' life, his teachings, and the spiritual aspects of his mission, often offering a different perspective than what is found in traditional Christian texts. Some notable aspects of the Urantia version of Jesus' life include:
The Concept of Universe Sons: The Urantia Book presents Jesus as a "Universe Son" or a divine being who incarnated on Earth as part of a larger cosmic mission to reveal the nature of God to humanity.
Expanded Teachings: The book contains extensive teachings attributed to Jesus, many of which are not found in the canonical Gospels of the Bible. These teachings often emphasize spiritual concepts, personal growth, and the relationship between individuals and God.
Focus on the Spiritual Message: The Urantia Book places a strong emphasis on the spiritual and theological aspects of Jesus' mission, aiming to provide a deeper understanding of his divine nature and the purpose of his life.
Cosmic Context: The book situates Jesus within a broader cosmic framework, discussing his role in the universe and the spiritual hierarchy of beings.
It's important to note that while The Urantia Book offers a different perspective on the life and teachings of Jesus, it does not necessarily contain information that was "weeded out" of the Roman Catholic version of the Bible. Instead, it presents an alternative interpretation of Jesus' mission and message.
The reason it is not considered part of mainstream Christian canon is that its origins and teachings are distinct from those of traditional Christianity. It's essential to approach The Urantia Book with an open mind, understanding that it represents the beliefs of a specific religious group but is not universally accepted within the broader Christian tradition.
User
so were you able to catch some things of the jesus section of the urantia book that they edited out of the roman catholic bible?
ChatGPT
The Urantia Book and the Roman Catholic Bible are two entirely different texts, and they were not created through a process of editing or redaction of each other. The Urantia Book is a separate religious text created by a specific religious group, the Urantia Fellowship, and is not considered part of the traditional Christian canon.
The Roman Catholic Bible, which includes the Old and New Testaments, is a compilation of various ancient texts, including the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) and the Gospels, letters, and other writings of early Christians (New Testament). The canonization of the Christian Bible was a complex historical process that occurred over centuries, and different Christian denominations may have slightly different versions of the Bible.
The Urantia Book, on the other hand, is a distinct work that offers a unique interpretation of spirituality and the life of Jesus. While it does include an extensive narrative about Jesus, it's not a matter of "editing out" content from the Roman Catholic Bible, but rather presenting a different perspective and additional teachings.
As such, you won't find direct comparisons of content that was edited out of the Roman Catholic Bible and included in The Urantia Book because they are fundamentally different texts with different origins and purposes. If you have specific questions about the content of The Urantia Book or its interpretation of Jesus' life, it would be best to consult the book itself or seek guidance from individuals or communities familiar with its teachings.
[contined in part 2 of 2] lol
I used chatGPT to think of the thread title name. Here I was asking it.
Going to post this in a conspiracy forum thread. Can you think of a title. It's a segment from the Da Vinci code movie. So I'd start the title by saying "Segment from the Da Vinci code movie about" How would you sum this up for the rest of the title.
Then I pasted the content. It replied:
"Segment from The Da Vinci Code Movie: Unveiling the Controversial Origins of Christianity"
There you go.. your thread title. lol
So what is this all about here. The other thread, we got them having a beef about women. Now this.
Click on the thread link to see the full sized one. That'd be, lol..
https://media.scored.co/post/FtZXQiQCbxw5.jpeg
So what do you got going on here.. the Jesus dude is in the middle there and it looks like it just stops? Is this what they call the Merovingian bloodline.
Betcha that's why they did this bullshit find out your "family tree" DNA test shit years ago where, oh everybody can just send it in. Meanwhile they wanted to find out who's from this, eh.
My older sister wanted us to oh take the swab, send it in. I was like.. fuck that. Betcha they have the tech to bio engineer like a disease that targets just who knows what, eh. Glad I didn't do that. Even just stupid shit they get their hands on like covid tests or something. lol. Those.. they'd have the covid on the damn swabs so you'd catch it. That's how it spread around when everybody's locked down.
Anyways.. this pic here.. none of these names are ringin a bell.. but maybe you guys can figure out something with it. lol
Hang on, looking at this full size. So you got this Solomon guy near the top but it's cut off a bit on the side. He's bad that guy.. the lesser key of solomon.
Then you're going down the Jesus dude.. those vine things it doesn't stop it goes on the other side if another one is coming down. So you can keep going from over there.. it kind of goes on the right. Lower down you see this Merovingian stuff.
Looks like they had 3 kids. Ya got the Jesus 2. lol. These 2 guys flunk out but this one guy gets it up and gets it going. lol.
That goes down to this fisher kings thing. Keep going own you get into this Merovingian area in the middle. But that peters out like 575. This whole thing seems to crap out at the year 600. lol.
Oh wait no.. lol.. when it gets to the fisher kings.. it would be whoever's involved in all those other branches that might have the "magic" in their DNA. lol. So it's just one flunker who couldn't keep it going in that branch, right. So that means it could be in all these other ones.. like the Lancelot ones. Also gets into Arthur. lol. I don't know.. these stupid branches that are cut off and continue on the other side. Who knows. I'm out. lol
yeah I was just about to try and look up what this holy grail was. Why would the church try and stop this, right. So could be like Jesus's kid. Wasn't this something about this Merovingian bloodline.
So he'd have these super powers where he could do miracles. Well, see those couple vids of magicians doing street magic where they do stuff he did. But they pull it off using a demonic entity you can't see, that they made a pact with. It moves the matter. Maybe one of those guys are from that blood line. Maybe the Jesus dude was doing it like they were. So he'd be bad. lol
same shit, earlier pile. lol
yeah I just did a post.. so this talmud rabbi type dude, where those guys despise gentiles.. goes and writes a third of the damn book about how they're heroes and convert to the cult.
who's this paul guy.. hang on doing a whole post about this dude. lol.
Knights templar are good guys.. they're valiant knights.. no funny business going on with them. Hey they're top of the structure of freemason organization on the york side.
And then, darn, we got an oopsie daisey I noticed the other day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet
Lemme know how the page begins.
"Baphomet is a deity allegedly worshipped by the Knights Templar[3]"
Researching this guy.. he was bad like Judas and infiltrated the Jesus operation. You know, like Svali's stuff about how the illuminati gradually infiltrated all aspects of society over generations. That's how these guys operate, is "infiltration".
upside down cross like St Peter.. clue who's involved with getting it going. The devil. lol.
Where did we see these "Roman fasces" lately. The axe with the sticks around it.