6
mvrak 6 points ago +6 / -0

I certainly hope people here realize it was the loss of state rights and maybe the true death of the united states.

0
mvrak 0 points ago +1 / -1

Prequel for a staged invasion? Still says nothing about the earth.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, ID was not required at locations in Washington You can find NoID required in the posts for vax sites. If you go they do ask for insurance info but you can just play ignorant

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Injecting a virus into a test animal is fine. Claiming it can or cannot crossover is separate.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

That isn't optical. Electron microscopes don't see the same things.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I should add that there is no test where they have "reinfected" someone or something else using tissue from someone who has tested positive. This includes animal/bat tests. If I found such a test of course the bar for believable evidence would be damn high.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't discover virus because you can't test for it. Viruses are too small for any optical microscopy, and there is no proven DNA evidence except in silico which is latin for "i guessed using a computer".

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

The mossad agent evidence is partial. I don't think anyone is saying they didn't exist, but there is no reason to believe they were the only part of the equation. They could have been separate, or complementary.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have seen, in person, incredibly realistic projections several times in my life, as far back as the 1980s. In all cases, I could not tell what was the projector. The only explanation for that technology not being commercialized is that it is under a secrecy order. I assume that in the late 80s all commercial applications were forbidden. They want us to believe that holograms are fiction, since then we cannot disbelieve our eyes.

3
mvrak 3 points ago +3 / -0

Watched your video. I don't fault any of the logic.
The video does appear just as it did to me two decades ago. Gives me new perspective. Thanks for sharing.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dunno man, I researched it myself, and I can say that I find no proof viruses exist.

That no flight paths go near the south pole is concerning.

... and tell me to watch 30 hours of garbage

I mean, you don't have to pick a side, just admit where the evidence has a proper chain of custody. Where we can really rely on facts. Complaining that you would have to learn stuff to understand stuff doesn't really help your case.

5
mvrak 5 points ago +5 / -0

Watching it basically live on TV that day, it struck me, in my youth, as a controlled demolition.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

We know diseases exist as a general term. Some are external and some are internal issues. We don't know if viruses really do. Is a good question what is actually the cause.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure that should read 0.001% and instead of an abstract mathematical number should be more direct. Since it is a number everyone just imagines to what it actually refers.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, inasmuch as antennae amplify the incoming signal. That is what I mean. Amplify is a pretty generic term.....

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah yes, the abstract mythical 1% concept... as if money itself of conflated with the essence of evil.

3
mvrak 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just use alternate DNS

fuck icann

done

namecoin was real

.eth dns is real

unstoppable domains is real

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

5g frequencies as a carrier wave amplified by graphene. That's actually plausible.

by pkvi
1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

A reasonable assumption, but not what using a range means mathematically.

They could speak plainly and say, among the average incidence from each state ... x to y % did this.

by pkvi
7
mvrak 7 points ago +7 / -0

Are you seriously saying that there is an acceptable risk of sudden death in an airline pilot?

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

That logic presumes the "virus" model of germ theory. Since that model is broken, and we don't actually know which are true diseases and which are other, we don't know lengths of immunity for most disease.

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can help you understand emotion because the mechanics are rather simple but require a certain understanding of how humans interpret time. Because of that understanding... it is not too farfetched to imagine long-lived vampires not getting it. Requires video chat or in person because most people I teach need a lot of guidance.

Vampires would only be tempered by their outlook. They would perceive spans of time as smaller and less consequential. That only provides a dampening effect on emotion.

Understanding emotion doesn't remove it at all, if anything it makes it more pure by separating the natural feelings from the decided ones.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›