We know diseases exist as a general term. Some are external and some are internal issues. We don't know if viruses really do. Is a good question what is actually the cause.
You can't discover virus because you can't test for it. Viruses are too small for any optical microscopy, and there is no proven DNA evidence except in silico which is latin for "i guessed using a computer".
My vote is on FAKE. Oh, there's a virus. And people have died from it. Beyond that? Every number you've seen is FAKE.
We know diseases exist as a general term. Some are external and some are internal issues. We don't know if viruses really do. Is a good question what is actually the cause.
Ok, looking at it that way, autopsy on people dead supposedly of wuflu discovers blood clots, not virus. No wonder WHO forbade autopsy, right?
Btw Ivermectin clears out the clotting and junk, at least if taken early.
You can't discover virus because you can't test for it. Viruses are too small for any optical microscopy, and there is no proven DNA evidence except in silico which is latin for "i guessed using a computer".
False. Electron microscopes exist. The issue is these are not used on all patients, or anything but a tiny sample.