Thank you for your concern but I don't mind the downvotes. Those who downvote are usually neither able nor willing to follow the arguments.
Who the fuck names themselves John Doe?
One that has a very easily recognizable online persona that he does not want associated with this place.
He's saying that the scientists just confirmed that one of the flat-earthers statements is correct.
You're not wrong but if you are assured they have no means of escaping you then telling your supporters beforehand is good for morale.
The categorical error is yours, not theirs.
You're trying to play chess. They're playing checkers with chess pieces, intentionally, to confuse you, and you're yelling that the knight doesn't move this way.
They know. I know. I'm trying to tell you, but you're insisting they must be playing chess since they're using chess pieces. Against all evidence. Against the fact that you can't make any sense of their move. And that's how they win.
The media neither supports nor hates the police. The media spins narratives. They will say whatever they need to say to advance the cause of whoever is paying them.
Leftists in general speak against the police as the removal of an independent police and the subsequent replacement with a new security force under their control is a necessary step towards establishing a dictatorship. They're not against the police per se, and will gladly call upon it when the need arises. They're against any and all armed not directly under their control.
Which is why they will support it when they can have it do their bidding as it puts the police temporarily under their control.
As with anything done by Communists, it will not make any sense until you understand the concepts of asymmetrical warfare and the workings of the revolutionary mind.
It's a categorical error because they aren't being hypocritical. You argue that they are reacting in 2 different ways to the same thing depending on which side is doing. This is your categorical error. They are not.
You need to become familiar with the concepts of asymmetrical warfare and the workings of the revolutionary mind.
Alexander Macris published a good article about this recently but it can be easily summarized in a single sentence: "That which advances the cause is good, that which does not is evil."
You think they see riots, protests, or violence. They do not. Helping a cat down a tree or starving 150 million people is exactly the same thing to them. They see only whether it advances the cause.
Came here to say the same thing. Do these guys really planned to be an alt-tech company while using mainstream infrastructure? Specially after Gab went through the same thing in the past?
Who is this guy?
Not all channels of information. Only the ones that matter. The ones that the normies use.
they wont be able to censor it.
They are perfectly able to censor it. They have AI algorithms that censor thing in real-time now. They have been perfecting it the entire year using "covid misinformation" as an excuse.
i would want to nuke all possible electricity
Not possible.
we might end up with NOTHING HAPPENING in the next 9 days
I think that's the most likely outcome.
It cannot be considered a setup if the behavior is organic, fruit of deep indoctrination.
I have seen multiple people here suffering from this categorical error. Until you understand the notion of asymmetrical warfare and now the revolutionary mind works, you will remain unable to counter it, frozen into inaction like you are now.
This is a categorical error. The left is not hypocritical. You're the one playing by the wrong rules.
It's a categorical error. Some people are still thinking as if the rules still apply.
Which posts, shill? I never posted anything. Are you his replacement since he stopped answering?
Dude. Just tell them to study the Weimar Republic.
The people that write the regulations are usually from and by the same people that practice what I just said. In example, it is said that the democratic party leadership and the social network executive positions is a revolving door.
Agreed, but that's not what you're in the world for.
You guys gotta stop posting videos. If every other post here is an 1h video, without any comments, or information added, we're no better than a simple YouTube channel.
It's not illegal. The main issue is not the discriminating part. The main issue is the near monopoly. If there wasn't a monopoly, if VISA blacklists you, you go to the other side of the street and sign a contract with the competitor. Problem is now that the same people own the company, the competitor, the second competitor, the international company trying to break into the country, and all the up and coming challengers.
I can say that I vote up everything conspiracy, even if I disagree, even if I don't read. A lot of his posts fall into this category.
You do realize, of course, that the guy still drowned.
They hope to be eaten last.