4
jack445566778899 4 points ago +4 / -0

this is not really a “conspiracy” question - but there is certainly some overlap in regards to the “food pyramid” etc.

the answer - by the best available data - is high fat. basically the opposite of what the government recommends.

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s actually quite a bit of archaeology evidence for several pole shifts

Nonsense. However, i have been wrong in the past so ... what is the strongest evidence you know of to support the existence of this thing no one has measured or recorded in history?

They are close to extinction level events each time and everything is destroyed and reset back to the Stone Age basically

Cataclysm, sure - plenty of evidence for that. But no pole shifts.

The reason they are close to extinction level event is that when the pole shifts the crust of the Earth moves in such a way that it is no longer in sync with the weather so the winds continue to go east west and the oceans continue to go that way, much of the world is buried in a mile or two of ocean above sea level, or ripped to shreds by supersonic wins. If you survive that, he better hope your area doesn’t suddenly fall into the arctic zone where you will be flash frozen.

As i said, complete and utter tripe. contrived fiction with no scientific support whatsoever. poorly written apocalyptic fear porn.

I hope all of this is wrong

take heart! people make lousy prophets in every era, and humanity is (historically, and contemporarily) constantly stupid and wrong. the fear porn propaganda has a different purpose, and is a philosophical/mythological bias at the center of the secular religion of scientism.

as for archeology - the most reliable dating method in that “discipline” always was and continues to be pottery (and better than that, coinage with dates stamped in it). The dating methods are largely bunk.

Civilization as we know it will be wiped out within a half day, much of it buried under a mile of mud, and an additional mile of ocean for the next cycle of humans to discover.

i think there is significant evidence for the global flood; none for pole shifts afaiaa. however, that sort of event requires a LOT more water than we have now (even stored in “ice caps”).

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

but we have some good evidence for periodic cataclysms

To every culture living near an erupting volcano, or experiencing a severe earthquake, or even a severe storm - cataclysms abound.

as for some sort of regular/predictable periodicity - i am extremely skeptical.

in regards to “pole reversal”; that’s just total nonsense.

combined with reasons to think we might be experiencing a slower mass seppuku with radiation, chemicals and related poisons

i see it as warfare, genocide, and slavery not seppuku - but there certainly is a lot of that!

They want us to think that we're doomed, but they might have doomed us with such spirited and convincing methods

“they” wish! we are many, they are few. though granted, willingly accepting mass injection/administration of sterilants could conceivably change that :(

in any case, “the sky is falling” and “the pole reversal is coming” are both silly fear porn.

2
jack445566778899 2 points ago +2 / -0

apocalyptic fear porn nonsense.

there is no scientific support for “pole shifts”.

as long as everything is going to be destroyed anyway - nothing you do matters ... right?!

2
jack445566778899 2 points ago +2 / -0

But perhaps the most alarming aspect of their nonexistence online is that it is also unclear why they were created.

lol, yes - if you are oblivious and/or braindead.

5
jack445566778899 5 points ago +5 / -0

my guess is prop food that has been sprayed with something and is otherwise inedible/poisonous. looks like no one else in the shot is eating either.

pretty common for movie shoots.

5
jack445566778899 5 points ago +5 / -0

thank you for posting the source!

this isn’t quite right, because the datasets are a bit “apples to oranges” - but there is still certainly something going on here.

the ioc report was only looking at 35 and under athletes and the maron study was only looking at american athletes. the total cardiac arrest tally being compared to those numbers from 21-22 is global, without age restriction, and also seems to include people who may or may not be considered “athletes” depending on your criteria.

however, in any case - having the same/similar amount in a single year to ~40 years combined is very disturbing.

2
jack445566778899 2 points ago +2 / -0

The thread you wish to debate is if man has the intelligence to invent rockets that can propel people into low earth orbit

i sincerely have no wish to debate anything, ever. i only seek discussion and the earnest and collaborative pursuit of truth. if i am wrong, i should like to know it and how to demonstrate it; how about yourself?

i do not doubt that man has the intelligence to invent rockets (thousands of years old). i doubt the existence of orbit, writ large, and hence no rocket - no matter how sophisticated or intelligent the inventor - can ever achieve it. it is not coincidence that orbit began, historically, as contrived fiction and today can ONLY be seen on television.

If you do not have such faith, then you are of low intelligence

it's quite the opposite! those of low intelligence and knowledge are the most likely to rely on superstition/belief/faith/mythology/religion. they do this precisely because they lack the knowledge and/or ability to understand (“low intelligence” as you put it). only a fool believes what they ought to know! faith/belief is the enemy of all knowledge and objective study of any kind (it’s called bias).

2
jack445566778899 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't debate

not a problem; i don’t debate at all! debate is base pageantry for idiots.

i only seek rational discourse and the collaborative pursuit of truth.

You have no evidence that would compel me to believe the earth is flat

i don’t want you to believe in the shape of the earth at all, regardless of what shape it is. if you believe the earth is round, flat, or any other shape - you have faith not fact.

as for compelling evidence, there is plenty of that. why do you so wish there wasn’t?

the voluminous amount of evidence to the contrary

like what? i have been at this a long time. i have evaluated the “voluminous amount of evidence” and found it to not support the premise when scrutinized rationally/critically.

why don’t you start small/simple - what is the best / most compelling (to you!) evidence that supports your view that the world is spherical?

So what's the point?

this is the right question! there are many, but a couple good ones for starters are

  1. the pursuit of truth
  2. excising belief where it doesn’t belong and replacing it with knowledge

Debating ... [anyone is] ... 100% waste of time

because debate is a silly game for stupid people. intelligent people prefer rational discourse and the pursuit of truth - not impressing/manipulating judges and the audience for “points”. in any case, i’m not a flat earther - so you don’t have to worry about that!

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

practice what you preach.

are you truly so afraid of a simple conversation? or are you just incapable of reading and rationally responding to the content of my comments? in either case, the one who needs help is you :(

practice what you preach, brother or sister.

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

“la, la, la - i can’t hear you” - you

:(

why are you so afraid to engage rationally in a simple conversation? especially if your worldview is correct, you should not need to avoid and discard any alternative views in such a way.

if i am wrong, tell me so! explain how orbit wasn’t first invented as imaginative fiction! if you try to do this, i am certain you will learn something - but perhaps this is what you are afraid of above all else :(

3
jack445566778899 3 points ago +3 / -0

interesting. thanks for sharing!

the cited source, an expert in electron microscopy, doesn’t so much say that viruses don’t exist - but that they have never been established as the causal agent of any sickness/disease.

they argue/suspect that all viruses are endogenous (exist within us naturally already) and are not responsible for any sickness (alone, anyway).

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

or you could of course conduct no research and continue to blindly believe that what you were required to learn and parrot is inerrantly true; however, it is the position/path of the ignorant fool and religious zealot - not the intellectual/earnest student.

reality is stranger than fiction because fiction is obliged to possibility.

consider that your quips are only flimsy excuses to ignore and refuse to consider alternatives. conditioned tactics of a zealot designed to protect their faith at all costs.

if what i were saying (about orbit and space) was true - would you want to know it? could your ego take the hit? could you cast off your foolish pride and undue certainty to recognize that - yet again - you were wrong?

there is no shame in recognizing you believed in foolish things you had no evidence to support. there is no shame in being wrong. there is immense shame in refusing to recognize your mistakes to shield your pride - don’t you agree?

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol.

of course, one could flippantly say that about anything (and even to people not named jack)!

i know what i’m saying sounds unthinkable, but i encourage you to do some research on it. even if you refuse, as it seems you do, to consider that orbit is fictional - you will see that i am entirely correct that that is its clear historical origin.

we are encouraged to believe, through conditioning by rote under the guise of education (from childhood), that that fiction ultimately ended up being totally real and scientific - but no one can deny that it did not start that way. it was simply made up, fabricated, imagined - aka fiction.

the “void” of space also began that way, and was first created by the coimbra jesuits (aka monks). also entirely fictional and, according to us in our modern wisdom, just happened to be totally real, correct, and scientific.

there is a lot to study on this topic, and i assure you - i know plenty if you ever want to discuss it further!

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just keep posting the same link to the same comment you can’t read or understand.

I’m sure that will help establish that you are totally not a bot :(

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just keep posting the same link to the same comment you can’t read or understand.

I’m sure that will help establish that you are totally not a bot :(

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

no one said the earth was flat, nor “admitted” anything. stop listening to the voices in your head.

yes, that link is a comment of mine. you should try reading it sometime, if you are at all capable of doing so.

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

no one said the earth was flat, nor “admitted” anything. stop listening to the voices in your head.

yes, that link is a comment of mine. you should try reading it sometime, if you are at all capable of doing so.

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

but i can go outside right now with an antenna and prove that it is

how?

there is no point in giving any more time to researching the flat earth

it certainly seems that way at first glance, but i assure you this is not the case - regardless of the true shape of the earth.

2
jack445566778899 2 points ago +2 / -0

The people that think man is not smart enough to orbit the Earth are the real villains

smart has nothing to do with it. impossible things can’t be done no matter how smart you are.

orbit is entirely fictional. and if you learn about the history of the concept - you find that it always was from the very beginning.

i, once again, invite you to exchange views in further depth on flatearthresearch.

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

no one said anything about that.

learn to read (if you can / are not a bot), and stop listening to the voices in your head.

if you want to inanely mutter to yourself - do it without posting/commenting!

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

no one said anything about that.

learn to read (if you can / are not a bot), and stop listening to the voices in your head.

if you want to inanely mutter to yourself - do it without posting/commenting!

1
jack445566778899 1 point ago +1 / -0

The post is archived

oh no! the post you didn’t read and don’t understand is now archived?! heavens to betsy, whatever shall we do?

All of your spam is meaningless

it’s only spam to you because you don’t read or understand it. it’s the same reason you failed to find a single instance of me refusing to answer a question of yours. you are delusional and childish. do better, if you can.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›