0
instrumental 0 points ago +1 / -1

It is moot. Your opinion doesn't matter because you don't matter.

0
instrumental 0 points ago +1 / -1

Interesting theory. I don't think I agree, but have never tried gay anal, so I'm no authority on the subject.

0
instrumental 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nah, I thought it was pretty valid.

-1
instrumental -1 points ago +1 / -2

Being 'an undereducted' may be a matter of perspective, because clearly education does not always teach common sense, nor does it give an educated a sense of humor, if an educated is what you're claiming to be. I don't hold a degree in psychology, but it doesn't take an educated to recognise where your head is at.

0
instrumental 0 points ago +1 / -1

I take eveything with a grain of salt, but also look at it this way: If the 'pius' Catholic Church can cover-up sex crimes of 10K+ priests against 10K+ kids over decades, I find it not unreasonable to think that another 'insider' section of society (Hollywood) that is already notorious for it's debauchery, would have some (if not many) that are engaged in the very same business. I'd go so far as to say that it could be even more prevalent in Hollywood (porn capitol of the world), where sex commonly buys yachts and mansions in Malibu, and has historically made the careers or many young actresses (and actors). As we've seen Harvey Weinstein, Bryan Singer, Kevin Spacey, Bill Cosby and others eventually get arrested or disgraced for their actions, it appears several got away with it for years by paying off some of their victims. The ones who got busted must surely only be only a small fraction of all Hollywood offenders, and the more powerful the offenders are, the easier it must be keeping people silent. Folks love money after all, nondisclosure agreements are a thing, and people have been known to die suddenly before testifying to things that could hurt powerful people.

Keeping in mind this topic swirls around not only the Catholic church revelations, but following the Michael Jackson allegations, Epstein-Maxwell affair, NXIVM/Keith Raniere sex trafficking cult, Oprah Winfrey's relationship with the John of God child sex slave baby mill in Brazil, and all the organized child sex shit that goes on in the rest of the world (and has for centuries), while I agree that folks shouldn't automatically believe everything they read from any old source, I hardly think calling folks paranoid schizoids over persuing the topic is fair, and it's counterproductive to dissuade them from investigating something that is reasonable to believe may be mostly true...unless of course, that is your specific agenda. Everything merits investigating further, but yes, people do need to use their heads and check every source they can find, especially if it's a subject that's important to them.

Just to be clear - I'm not a zealot, have never hitched myself up to any particular wagon for political, religious reasons or otherwise, and recognize there's ton of bullshit out there - especially politically-motivated and specifically fear-enducing bullshit designed to obfuscate and confuse, and try to keep it all in mind when investigating any topic.

But with a nod to those who do believe that this stuff may be more prevalent that many want to accept, I will say that the Franklin Credit Union scandal including everything surrounding Paul Bonacci, Johnny Gosch-Jeff Gannon and company is very difficult to dismiss. One of the most peculiar angles of the story is the alleged boy-sex snuff picture that was claimed to have been filmed by Hunter Thompson at Bohemian Grove¹, who as we know wrote about receiving adrenochrome from a satanist arrested for child molestation, and who planned to pimp out underage runaway Lucy to a conference full of cops and lawmakers in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. That is pretty fucking peculiar to me, and the implications are fairly far-reaching. Can't say for certain that the whole adrenochrome/Pizzagate thing got that from Thompson, or if Thompson was writing about something he actually was privy to, but I can definitely see why folks are curious about his alleged 'suicide'. He was a journalist after all, his character Raoul Duke was a mirror reflection of him in every other way, and being rebellious in nature, I can see him pushing the boundaries of what he was 'allowed' to say in a non-fiction context.

I'm reasonably certain there's something to it all, and Hollywood may play just a small part, but to what extent, I'm not sure we'll ever know. The world's a pretty fucked up place after all, I think on that much we can agree.

¹ Bohemian Grove, the place that holds 'mock' pagan human sacrifice ceremonies for elites that Nixon called "the most faggy goddamned thing you can ever imagine".

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aside from your exaggeration that with every single celeb death comes the claim of a pedo cover-up (because that's clearly absurd), and regardless of the validity of the source of this article (which was oviously regurgitated from elsewhere), do you claim that high-level Hollywood child sex crimes don't exist, and even if they did, those who threatened to expose them wouldn't be murdered? Seems pretty niave to dismiss it outright, unless you are specifically pushing this narrative.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every celebrity that dies has a conspiracy theory constructed around them? I don't think that's even close to being accurate. I'm willing to entertain the possibility that she's being used by larpers and disinfo spinners/propagandists to further an agenda because of her history of sexual abuse when she was a child and the sex trafficking movie, but I'm also willing to consider that there are powerful Hollywood pedos that will murder anyone who threatens to expose them, and the most powerful of them surely have each other's backs. It's really not all that far-fetched, nor is the idea that some Hollywood actors may become privy to such behavior, and become offended by it.

I've never been into the whole Q thing and do think it's a psychological operation, but that's how psyops work: sprinkle in bits of truth or spin lies around a foundation of truth to make the lies more believeable. I'm willing to both accept that this is the case with this Anne Heche story, and that true acts of organized child sex crimes by the rich and powerful leads to the murder of those who threaten to expose them. Epstein seemed to have build an industry around blackmailing them, has that not been established? Or is that bullshit too?

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your ego clearly overshadows your sense of humor.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was just a wild guess.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you believe she was chosen to have this lie told about her because that sex trafficking movie Girl in Room 13 was the last film she made, and it made her the perfect recently dead celeb to fabricate a story about being a potential Hollywood pedo whistleblower? That and the fact that she was vocal about being raped by her dad when she was a kid? Man, just one of those facts is convenient, but the two combined must've been like a wet dream come true for someone waiting for another celeb to die that they could falsely claim was about to out Hollywood pedos. Almost seems predatory.

3
instrumental 3 points ago +3 / -0

It lists 'Mel's Hole' as an entrance to a base, but calls it 'Hell's Hole'. I happened to catch the orininal call from Mel Waters on the Art Bell show back in the day, and it's different than the other deep hole Art featured on C2C AM which he called the 'hell hole.' I believe it was in Russia, where it was claimed this audio clip he played of what sounded like millions of people screaming was recorded.

Just went to search for more on Mel's Hole to drop a link if no on has ever heard of it, and there's a wiki entry. Old Mel disappeared and was never heard from again, no record of him was to be found. He got 'memory holed' it seems.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ancestors from Atlantis, of course.

2
instrumental 2 points ago +2 / -0

Phasing out humans to make way for legions of terminators and drones?

by DrLeaks
1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure sex offenders are segregated from the rest of the population in most facilities nowadays specifially because of this, so not sure how often that happens anymore. I don't keep tabs on prison pedo murder counts though, so I could be wrong.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nixon called Bohemian Grove "the most faggy goddamned thing you can ever imagine".

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

In past weeks I've had a few unnerving cardiac moments with irregular heartbeat, arrhythmia, or palpitations, along with extreme fatigue described well by you when you wrote "I'd go to bed exhausted and wake up even more tired". I'm not vaxed, but did realize after a couple of weeks and the symptoms began to subside that a huge new cell tower had been erected a block away from my house immediately before the symptoms began. I'm sure one has nothing to do with the other, though.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's unfortunate that the documentarian misspoke at the beginning of that excerpt when he said "physical and biological" when he meant "digital and biological". Pretty big gaffe to miss or choose to not edit. May turn off many from taking the rest seriously or even bothering to watch it, I'm afraid.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's moot that you're not concerned about these devices, because the pic is CG and these devices do not actually exist.

Larger drones however, seem to be the least of our concerns, since they can be seen with the naked eye and shot out of the sky.

What's infinitely more scary are the even smaller "drones" - nanobots that can only be detected with expensive scanning electron microscopes.

Research "smart dust", so as not to be considered totally out of the loop.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not, it's CG. I remember stumbling across this image around 15 years ago and investigating it's legitimacy, finding the website of the artist who created it. Don't recall the name or how I found it, but a quick reverse image search shows over 1200 versions of this image published since 2008.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pete's playroom.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

This headline is completely wrong. The 25-year old chip tech is not biometric at all, whereas fingerprint and facial recognition are in fact biometric ID methods.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›