I downdooted you temporarily, because at first glance it looked like spam, lol.
82yo Marvin Minsky did Virginia Guiffrey. You don't actually believe that Jeffrey had no footage of that copulation, do you? And you don't actually believe that Nicolas Negroponte et al. as well as the John Brockman circus were not into it also, do you? Influencing the influencers with blackmail is a thing.
I learned about the issue at school, in economics, including law (like go see the doctor every two weeks, age of consent, which was 18 for females, 19 for males, hookers don't pay taxes, because government must not profit from lewd activity, not legal for teachers, lawyers, doctors, etc.) We also learned where the examination in the city took place and that the (large) cafe close to the place was always filled with professionals waiting for their turn. So I went there to check out them ladies what was surprisingly boring although you could tell who the more expensive ones were. Some hookers apparently knew that I knew. I was 15 or 16 in 9th grade. The economics teacher was female and a feminist/commie, but the matter was not her initiative, at least not alone, because there was a chapter on prostitution in the economics book. The trade served as an example of how economics is not a hard science and that government regulation is not a pure economics issue or something. (There was also a passage on global drug trade. I can't remember details, because I did not pay much attention at school and almost flunked eco that year. Had to take a test after the summer break for proving that I had caught up and did.)
lol awesomely epic
cue the theme song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8vE61ZBTzA
Hookers are the only women deserving respect. The article is promoting legalization. The US is completely retarded and also unjust in that regard. Sugar daddies are legal, but prostitutes are not? Prostitution is illegal for moral reasons, but legal if you put a director and movie cameras around her payola-sex? This makes no sense.
More like Grandma "Brrrr" Yellen. We laughed at Idi Amin who said in the 70s that he would simply print more money if there weren't enough of it for running Uganda. Well, no one is laughing anymore, because - guess what - turns out that the man was the pioneer of modern central banking! Kudos to you champion!
Interesting, but the strangest thing here is that not much is new here. I saw a video shortly after the murder, with a Seymour Hersh interview, where Hersh said that Seth wanted money for the leak. I THINK I remember that Hersh said he did not take the case very seriously and just made a few phone-calls to help people.
MS-13 involvement was assumed right out of the box, but I never learned why.
Note that all insights in the murder come from private investigators with no actual mandate while cops did nothing, apparently.
I'm not saying the investigator is lying, but the deep state practices are rather odd.
1.) Why rob a memory stick with content that has already been leaked? Why assume that there aren't any more copies hidden somewhere?
2.) Agent Rosati shot the two MS-13 members who had killed Rich and had to move from Maryland to Delaware. If that was for being safe from retaliation by a notorious crime syndicate -- wow, easy! Just relocate to another state! Live happily ever after!
3.) Faux federal investigator Burkman conducted research into the Seth Rich murder AND had a business venture with one of the perpetrators. How did that happen? Am I supposed to believe that someone starts an investigation without knowing that it will eventually unearth complicity of one of his business partners? Who happens to be a rogue government official and criminal?
4.) Doherty, that business partner, shot Burkman, and it is unclear whether that was for his investigation or because their business venture had failed. Doherty is jailed. Did Doherty expect that to happen? How did they catch him?
I take issue with the terminology of "male" and "female" connectors, because reality is not as binary. All connectors should facilitate transitioning. And don't get me started on constellations, for most are male, except "virgo" which glorifies a fetish of the patriarchy.
This indeed tells us something. I also suspect that there is some fuckery going on with insider trading for pharmaceutical stocks. They can now pump and dump or short and snort certain companies at will and use that for frontrunning.
1.) Your stance depends on your sources, i.e. what you read, see and hear. 2.) Part of the human condition is finding and paying for your personal compromise between individuality and conformity. 3.) Since there is no math in politics, truth is a matter of taste, or better: depends on your mores and your conception of man. 4.) Democracy and civics require literacy, responsibility and maturity.
In other words...
A.) If you get your news from CNN, your stance will be different from people who get their news from antiwar.com. B.) Solitary animals are not as susceptible to group-think as social animals. C.) If you want to earn an honest buck, save money and want to pass your genes in such a fashion that your offspring will also be successful earning honest bucks and save money, your worldview will be different from that of a hedonistic journo, for example. D.) Big government and consumer society are incompatible with the spirit of the constitution.
Looks like a still from an Isaac Arthur vid. I want to be a salaryman with a pet otter now.