2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

completely different centuries

Almost as if truth stays the same. Huh.

pile of accusations

Like what many jEWs do?

you claim Jews after 70 AD are impostors and not connected to the ancient Hebrews. Yet the apostle Paul the Apostle was already dealing with Jewish communities before 70 AD in places like Rome, Corinth, and Ephesus.

Before 70 AD. So you're just reinforcing my point.

The same people you are trying to separate are the very communities the New Testament is talking about.

How so?

And the idea that Jews secretly worship Baal or Molech today is pure assertion.

A baal statjEW was burnt and ((they)) screechkvetched over it! They basically blew their kippahs off XD Kek!

Judaism has condemned those idols for thousands of years.

The type in the Bible. Since when has chab*d or AIPAC ever spoken out against those?

That accusation only works if you ignore what Jewish texts and practices actually say.

Okay, what do they say?

Your coin clipping example also collapses the moment you look at the records. Medieval courts prosecuted large numbers of Christians for that crime.

https://media.scored.co/scale/i74zza7J7fFfnrH5.jpeg

Yet entire Jewish communities were blamed collectively because they were convenient scapegoats.

Unfortunately mistakes do happen and nuance can get lost amongst the drama.

That is exactly how stereotypes get created.

So why would they blame Juce and not someone else?

Then you jump from medieval accusations to modern politics

Oh but medieval accusations against muslims and modern politics are relateable. What's good for the goose...

and try to weld it all together into one narrative. That is not evidence. It is just connecting unrelated grievances across centuries.

That's like saying islamic jihad isn't related to muslims.

The irony is that the New Testament itself warns Gentiles not to go down this road.

According to the Bible we should expose evil. Why do I not see any of the usual pro-jEW guys point out anything negative jEWs do?

Romans 11:17–18 (Amplified Bible) “But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive [shoot], were grafted in among them… do not boast against the branches… it is not you who supports the root, but the root that supports you.”

I touched on this one too. Also boasting implies pride. Who is doing boasting?

The West and Whites have dumped infinity help on the New jEWs, yet their countries are flooded with so much evil. Gay, trans, mass migration, a garbage economy, worse health, etc. Almost as if giving them MATERIALISTIC possessions is the wrong way to view those verses.

So calling centuries of disconnected accusations “facts” does not make them historical or biblical. It just shows you are stitching together grievances instead of dealing with what the texts actually say.

"So calling decades of accusations against communists "facts" does not make them historical or biblical. It just shows you are stitching together grievances against them instead. "

3
harzkp813 3 points ago +3 / -0

your demon

Isn't Yeshua the Hebrew name of Jesus? Explain how that means a demon?

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nowhere did I deny jEWs do bad. My point is the notion that ONLY they are bad is false. I did not say whether you believed it or not.

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are jumping between centuries, stereotypes, and modern politics and pretending it is one continuous argument. It is not.

EXACTLY. So that basically disproves your entire idea that j EVVs and J ews (Heb rews!) are the same.

First, the “Christkiller” accusation. The New Testament itself does not support blaming an entire people.

Know what a "Representative" is? Also I don't blame a people, that is a strawman the edj EVVcation system drilled into the weakmind g0ybrains.

Yeshua was executed by Roman authority under Pontius Pilate. Historically that is how crucifixion worked. Rome carried it out.

Who made Rome do it? It's not like there's a "clean side".

Second, the idea that Jews today secretly worship Baal or Molech.

It's not secret, it's known.

That accusation makes no sense when applied to Ju daism. Ju daism has been strictly monotheistic for thousands of years

You mean the OT kind, which isn't being practiced, to our knowledge. There is also no temple for sacrifices to be properly done.

and explicitly condemns those idols. The Heb rew Scriptures repeatedly condemn Molech worship as abomination.

And j EVVs after 70 A.D. do not follow them, to our knowledge.

Third, the coin clipping stereotype. That crime shows up in medieval Europe. Court records from England and other kingdoms show large numbers of Christians prosecuted for it. Yet entire Je vvish communities were often blamed collectively even when individuals convicted were not Je vvish. That is where the stereotype comes from.

Believed what jEVVs said about his ancestors award. "The people whose country bombed the USS Liberty and killed JFK are more trustworthy than everyone else! Leo frank dindu nuffin! Larry Loomer the trans person is the best influencer!"

Imagine undermining your own faith in support of people who view you as g0yim (cattle). How many statues of WW1 and WW2 veterans are there in holocost museums? In Israel? What's UNreal's policy on blacks or indians marrying J evvs?

Fourth, the claim about political control or a unified agenda.

A depressingly large amount are in favor of it. The others don't care or are ignorant about it. This argument is no different from the "Not All Mozlems" argument.

J evvish populations are politically diverse across countries and communities.

Didn't say otherwise. Fact: More j EVVs voted for cameltoe HairyHas than Trump in 2024.

The fact that some J evvs hold positions of influence does not prove a coordinated agenda any more than influential Catholics, Protestants, or secular people prove those groups run governments.

Then how come all Western countries at some point want to suicide via woke policy and mass migration?

Fifth, the argument that ancient He brews were different from Je vvs today. Historically that is incorrect. Juda ism developed directly from the religion and people of ancient Is real after the Second Temple period.

It was in effect from when people offered sacrifices and observed 613 laws to after Jesus rose.

With all the horrendous outcomes that influential jEVVs produce, how can you possibly believe they are Heb rews?

The continuity is widely recognized in historical and archaeological scholarship.

If that was true we would be taught that instead of Swindler's Li(e)st and literal Hollywood propaganda.

Finally, the entire discussion started because you were mocking

Ah, because questioning a number is mocking.

the idea that a J evv could believe Yeshua is the Messiah.

Then he would be a Christian. Or do you mean racially?

The apostle Paul the Apostle was exactly that: a J evv

Hebrew by lineage?

So the attempt to divide “Hebrews” from “Je vvs,” pile on

A ton of facts, yeah. Like

medieval accusations,

Like how j eVVs accuse g0ys of a bunch of things, one alltime favorite being "anti SHEMite"?

and then attach modern politics to it does not hold up historically or Biblically.

Because the impostors that appeared later also didn't exist.

Facts don't care dude.

Correct.

1
harzkp813 1 point ago +1 / -0

questioning it

Straw Man!

GRRRR MUH ACCOUNTS

Personal attack "gotcha". Calm down there [TONEPOLICED BY MOSSADERATOR] Skil.

one hour

lol

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

contradicted

Nope

not what happened

"Some opinions are wrong." "Not what happened." "What?"

3
harzkp813 3 points ago +3 / -0

Neither are good

Correct. This point should be stressed more. People are too stupid to spot false dichotomies, sadly.

course the nazis censor

Examples?

they abuse and dehumanize other groups, they put themselves up on a pedestal. This is the sin of pride at work.

Isn't that just Juice's projection?

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. The talMUD did not exist yet.

So that means Paul was not a Modern Jew.

It (chicken abuse) has nothing to do with Paul

Precisely.

prosecuted for coin clipping were Christians

Nope. "Judeo"-christians, mabye.

Paul explicitly condemned idolatry.

Precisely. He also wasn't greedy, hostile, cracking down on as much criticism as he could, or always angry.

while following Yeshua

Which people like Netanyahu clearly do not.

His people?

God's people are anyone who follows Christ, aren't they?

descendant of Abraham

There is no temple so there are no records. Good luck tracing the kippahmen's lineage.

member of Israel

Not a member of 1948 isntreal which was created by THE GLOBALIST SATANIST ELITE U.N.

It is insane how people will rail on the U.N. all day but yet support IsFake.

modern issues

Like how 1948 U.N.real is modern. 1948 Isreal is Unreal!

Did he push miscegenation? No. Paul spoke about unity of Jews and Gentiles in the Messiah, not modern racial categories.

Precisely.

Was he pro-usury? No. Paul taught believers to live honestly and not exploit others.

True.

A DIRECT WARNING TO GENTILES WHO START RAILING AGAINST JEWS.

So no one anywhere can ever criticize the ((()))', because you extrapolate a passage about Abram to these modern day fakes with no established lineage?

Romans 11:17–18 (Amplified Bible) “But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive [shoot], were grafted in among them… do not boast against the branches… it is not you who supports the root, but the root that supports you.” The Greek word sir for root is ῥίζα (rhiza), meaning the source or origin. LOOK IT UP!!

That's only talking about Hebrews. About OT believers in God. Not these new impostors seeking cover under a claim to the OT faith.

Enjoy your day.

You too!

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

old stereotypes

Okay, what about (((their))) stereotypes about goys, then?

believe the talmud over everything

I did not say "over everything". If I say a buddhist believes in a buddhist text, that doesn't mean he believes it "over everything".

are secular

Exactly. You have just made a great point. So there is no reason for Christians, let alone Trump, to cave to their every second demand. And it's well known they are fiercely nepotistic and them-first.

medieval myth

Believed what jEWs said about his ancestors award. "The Christkillers are more trustworthy than everyone else!"

often Christians

Imagine undermining your own faith in support of people who view you as goyim (cattle). How many statues of WW1 and WW2 veterans are there in holocost museums? In Israel? What's Israel's policy on blacks or indians marrying Jews?

baal or moloch

Even the OT "Jews" (really, Hebrews) kept falling for them. How much more that has increased after 70 A.D.

strictly monotheistic

Again, confusing Hebrews with "Jews".

condemned

I haven't seen any condemnation or denouncement from (((them))) since after 70 A.D.

idea that Jews are pushing modern Western political movements like LG

The powerful ones who could effect real change did that, yeah.

just conspiracy thinking

That's establishment, mainstream-freindly naive thinking.

Don't you think if the goobernment lies about Covid, 911, Iraq, among other things, why can't it ever be wrong about ((()))s?

unified agenda

A depressingly large amount are in favor of it. The others don't care or are ignorant about it. This argument is no different from the "Not All Mozlems" argument.

all over the spectrum

Didn't say otherwise. Fact: More jEWs voted for cameltoe HairyHass than Trump in 2024.

medieval laws often banned Christians

That double standard was unjust and should never have happened, then. Also there is still usury today.

floated around for centuries

Because they were true, not myths. I thought "truth lasted"?

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

Out of context? You said "straw man" to my quote of you.

Who are you

I am your father, Luke.

subhuman

I'm the one winning.

You're a humiliation.

I'm not the one who responded "straw man" to my own quote.

Delete this one

Useless.

1
harzkp813 1 point ago +1 / -0

aren't Christian

Ah yes, because having an opinion about a race/religion you don't like makes someone a "not Christian". No, but it does make them ignorant.

conceding

admitting you're only here to lie

Straw Man!

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did Paul believe in the talmud? Did Paul abuse chickens? Did he clip coins? Did he bow to moloch and baal? Did he wear the star of "david"? Did he cry victim all the time? Did he want mass immigration and LGTBBQ and trans and pron? Did he push miscegnation? Was he pro-usury?

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

XD

SpergSkil just inadvertently claimed a DIRECT quote of him himself https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASGEKZXHg/templar-crosses--an-expression-o/c/4eaUokPmCXr is a strawman.

Cool self own and humiliation.

2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't you get it yet? The jEWs do not care about technicalities and complexity, they want to hurt the USA not help it. They think they're the Chosen Ones, deserve all good things, deserve zero bad things, and want to KILL WHITEY. They would laugh in your face if you said this to them.

5
harzkp813 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's 2026. Why haven't U.S. scientists discovered better and cheaper foods and given them to the troops? Oh right because of jEWs, greed, fraud, Elite Peedofiles, illegals, immigrants with <105 IQ, indians, and leftists.

1
harzkp813 1 point ago +1 / -0

I called he/she/it a downvoter. Did they downvote? Yes. Accurate statements aren't ad hominems.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
harzkp813 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably a theory. If not, then a joke.

view more: Next ›