▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

You better hope we do or there’s no point to any of this.

Ps. If you like reading more than videos, a mechanical engineer from the f-18 fighter jet project found Chang, studied under him for a decade and wrote a book linked in that thread. Highly recommend it after that video lol

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Considering the two places where 99% of us come from is r/con or TD I thought it was a fair assumption to make. Where did you get the link if you don’t mind the question?

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

But they invented .win? That like saying you had no idea your account on r/conspiracy boosts the default sub user counts.

I’m not saying it’s ideal but its far from hidden

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

A true creator wouldn’t stop at one planet.

▲ 9 ▼
Graphenium 9 points ago +9 / -0

Are you retarded? Wait don’t answer that I just checked your post history.

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be honest, I’m not sure what a dogmatic gnostic believe about reincarnation, but I’ve always been partial to the theory in the short story The Egg http://www.galactanet.com/oneoff/theegg_mod.html Something between that and the “group souls” discussed in the Ra Material

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just give it a shot bitch, it’s not that long and only a tard thinks they’ve got things all figured out (which includes thinking something has no value before investigating it for yourself)

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Link the animal trials if you got em chump

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4udaw1w/magic-is-and-always-has-been-rea/c/

Check that video out and tell me if you think that guy understands more or less about the universe and the nature of reality than the average person.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

You really don’t think there exists anything beyond the material?

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the sense that it is true knowledge that has passed through fewer censoring bodies and telephone game translations, I do rank the gospel of Thomas, along with other apocryphal works as more reliable than the works we have today in the canon.

I think that if anything, the modern Catholic Church (leadership) knows that Gnosticism is the truth, and they infact worship the demiurge.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes but fiat printing allows them to effortlessly conceal it and have people chasing money.

That’s a great point, they are inextricably linked.

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

By all accounts, meditation seems to be the one foolproof (with enough effort), means to enlightenment. Breath and sound (like mantras) are infinitely more important than we give them credit

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think all of our belief systems stem from some common origin, some Akashic principle which is embedded in our collective unconscious and gets released upon the world in a physical incarnation with some regularity.

I think everything that is happening has happened before and will happen again. Those who ignore history or think they have everything figured out are doomed to failure.

▲ 6 ▼
Graphenium 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey now, I think the Gnostics are fine people (not to mention the real ones all got wiped out a long time ago and all we have now are basically larps).

Why do you seek to defend some mythical “true catholicism”? Can’t you see that from its inception, the Catholic Church has been a tool of control? If anything Jesus was a fuck load more gnostic than he was catholic.

Have you ever read the gospel of Thomas? Nothing BUT quotes from Jesus. Check it out.

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the root of all materialist conspiracy. However, the spiritual and metaphysical worlds are, I assure you, as real as the material.

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

I feel so bad for the people who can’t see beyond the bars of their prison cell. Imagine being a “devout catholic” and rationalizing this shit to yourself.

▲ 7 ▼
Graphenium 7 points ago +7 / -0

Blow it out your ass jorge

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Second mother! and in fact any and all Darron Aronofsky films, especially Pi.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only thing I’ve seen is hiding the downvote button for people not subscribed to that specific sub. Which doesn’t do squat here.

I’ve heard that if the downvote button was hidden thru css it could be re-enabled by malcontents, but idk it might be better than nothing...

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

And you’re acting like a single argument you got into with a single person that disagreed with you and your bait represents an indelible blemish on the site, get over it.

Put more effort in your posts if you think your point isn’t getting across clearly enough.

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes to everything you just said. Some good ground rules for productive discourse! And none of it needs to be enforced by mods beyond egregious lapses.

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bitch about the site more. If anything that should be the one rule. People who are only here to tear down the site and break communication should get the boot.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s actually a ton of options, I don’t think we should eternally lock ourselves into whatever happens to get the most upvotes here. This is just a jumping-off point.

Edit: also which subs restrict downvotes to people with 100+ upvotes? I don’t know if I’ve seen that functionality before

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Name a single vaccine that’s suggested, much less tucking mandated that never underwent animal testing.

I’ll wait, retard.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›