Bruv,
Look, there are two distinct points here.
-
Gas chambers vis a vis lunch lines. Yes, that's exactly what I was saying. It seems like you understand the words, but not the point. Build something, and then get back to me. Please don't think of this as an insult. Most people never build anything. Engineering is very distinct from Mathematics.
-
'arguing in bad faith' -- do you even understand what that means? I'm clearly not arguing in bad faith. I might be wrong, but those are two distinct issues. You, on the other hand, are clearly arguing in bad faith. Again, you might be right, but that's a distinct issue.
As for gas chambers -- depends what you mean! I'm fluent in German, and visited Dachau which, these days, is not considered a Gas Chamber.
I read Maus (and other books) about Auschwitz. Maus is fantastic. If you persist in believing in the mythology, then -- hey, it's really one of the best-written things I've ever read.
Bruv, I gave you the source -- the official floorplans of the two major Crematoria at Auschwitz (they're mirror images, so one is enough).
Here's how it works:
- Look up the floorplans of Krema 2
- Stare at them for about 5 minutes
- Ask yourself how 2000+ people could undress in the fore-chamber when there would be no space.
- Ask yourself how you transfer 2000+ people from the fore-chamber to the 'gas chamber' via a narrow corridor and a narrow doorway.
- Stop yourself from screaming 'guns!' because (a) where would they put them; and (b) how would they control the panic in tight spaces.
- Stop yourself from screaming 'they were starving!' because that actually makes the problem even worse.
(you can also ask yourself how they get 2000+ people out of the doorway -- but this would probably be beyond most people who aren't engineers)
Then -- conclude, as does every engineer that looks at the problem, that the holocaust at Auschwitz could never have taken place. It's obviously not designed by Germans, and obviously is designed by that subset of jews who enjoy lying.
Treblinka and Babi Yar are even stupider.
Eh, the holofrost is obviously a hoax. Just look at the floor-plans of Auschwitz and it should be clear why -- unless you're bad at engineering.
I mean, I know you're just a troll, but the holofrost is a laughably stupid lie.
Chipping: The key point in understanding African 'AIDS' is to consider women. As I wrote to Redkrab above, American women get HIV but... don't die. You might think, OK, Africans have different DNA -- true! But the average American Black only has 20% White DNA, and there are 40 Million of them, so an 'AIDS' crisis would, certainly, show up in African-American women, right? But... it didn't!
So, officially, why did it occur in Africa? Well, apparently, according to the insane NGOs... Africans like 'dry sex' - -so they put herbs in a woman's vagina to dry it out, so that there's more friction... which meant more tearing in the vagina... Ah, as a kid who's had sex, 'friction' isn't the issue. To be vulgar, 'tightness' may be, but I'll leave it at that.
But then: Why did Africans die of AIDS... well... they didn't! Africans died for the usual reasons -- dysentery etc, from which they've died for centuries... Keep in mind that AIDS diseases in the USA were Kaposi's Sarcoma, while in Africa they were dying of diarrhea.
Ah, but, consider... Africans were, latterly, instrumentalized by 'people' to go into gold/diamond mines for 12 hours a day and... well, occasionally died. Is this surprising? Poor nutrition, lack of food, questionable sanitation... and they died. Wow?!?! Why!?!? Okay. AIDS.
Outside of the Chinese Opium trade, AIDS in Africa is the most cynical, horrific thing in history. Africans were dying because of normal reasons, which were re-classified as 'AIDS', so that drugs could be sold, and NGO chicks could pretend that they were 'helping' people.
If you want a good summary of this, read Nancy Turner Banks' 'Blood, Diamond Aids' (that title's from memory, so assuredly wrong, but you'll find it). I know we're on Conspiracies, so some might denigrate Black chicks... but the book is phenomenal.
Redkrab: No, they don't fake the tests perse... Hemophiliacs, for example, legitimately tested positive for the 'HIV virus', since they were infused with blood that also tested positive for the 'HIV virus'. If you want to read the story of Arthur Ashe, a world-famous tennis player... well, it's tragic.
The real question, as you ask, is... what are they finding? Well, I can only answer that in a slightly oblique way. If you look into the PCR method, what it does is double the amount of a specific DNA (or RNA) sequence in your body each time you run it. So, if you have only one strand of DNA in your sample, after 20 runs through PCR you'll have 1Million, which will be detectable via 'glowing' techniques.
An aside: if you have alcohol breath, and I can smell it, then in some sense I have alcohol in my nose. If you can amplify the alcohol molecules in my nose by 1M times... you'll think that I, too, was drunk.
So: what are they finding? Well... nothing. They're finding a specific DNA sequence that they have said is the cause of AIDS.
To realize that it's not consider: In the 80s, the US Army tested its recruits, both male and female, for HIV... and it turned out that women had HIV at the same rate as men. But, as you know, women in the US were not affected by AIDS at all!
As a more unpleasant example, the incidence of anal sex in India is astonishingly high! And yet, there's almost no AIDS in India. Same with Thailand, where Ladyboys are a thing. AIDS is largely an African thing, which I'll explain in my response to ChippingToe below.
To summarize, they're detecting a small chain of DNA which has no causative relation to immune deficiency. Then they give you drugs that destroy your liver and kill you. Why??? Well, to paraphrase a Berkley AIDS researcher... 'It's not that what I wrote was wrong... it's just that we're making so much money...'
Okay: 'AIDS' actually started out as 'GRIDS' - Gay Related Immune Deficiency Syndrome - in the very early 80s. A bunch of gays were dying, and it looked like their immune systems were shot.
Enter politics, and GRIDS became AIDS. Also, the virus-hunters looked for a particle, and eventually Gallo did a study where 4 of his 9 test-subjects had a 'virus' (HIV) in their system. This was immediately and with no research declared the cause of AIDS in a press conference.
What the media didn't/still doesn't tell us is that in the early 80s, (some/not all) gays lived an insanely degenerate lifestyle -- to the point where some (not all) were taking anti-biotics every day of their lives, simply to forestall the inevitable Chlamydia etc. Furthermore, in order to relax their anuses to facilitate anal sex, they were taking massive amounts of 'poppers', or amyl nitrate. It was advertised in gay magazines as a 'videotape cleaner'. This is why gays were dying of 'Kaposi's Sarcoma', a disease that almost no one gets -- they were destroying their lungs with poppers.
The massive drug-overdosing, particularly with poppers, is the cause of 'AIDS'. It's why AIDS remained a gay phenomenon. It's also why AIDS isn't really a thing these days, because the gay community moved away from massive popper ingestion (keep in mind that gay clubs would mist poppers into the room on a regular basis -- gotta keep that anus loose!).
Also: the idea that hemophiliacs were dying of AIDS is an (almost) complete lie. What's true is that hemophiliacs tested positive for AIDS after the AIDS test was invented, and then they were given drugs that killed them. Prior to the introduction of 'life-saving' AIDS drugs, no hemophiliacs died of AIDS.
As with many things, AIDS is just... doctors killing patients for no reason. Or, for no rea$$$on, if you want.
Of course, the obvious question here is... what about Africans. That's a whole 'nother story, and it's insanely cynical and depressing.
I had two parallel careers -- theoretical physicist and then I accidently became an engineer.
Bruv, you're not as dumb as you let on. You know that I know exactly what I'm talking about.