Deleted video. Can't let people judge for themselves.

The environmental impact of grass fed beef is about the same as the impact of chicken and turkey per pound of meat. It's factory farmed beef that's much worse. And grass fed beef is more nutritious than factory farmed beef.

17 is a discordian number as well, kind of the opposite of the control schemes the elites want. I guess we'll find out which 17 is stronger.

I doubt the extra energy needed to create synthetic beef is as good for the environment as naturally grazing cattle so they can replenish the soil.

Shit, is the mypillow guy actually trying to save us from this?

Nobody's saying MI6 and the CIA aren't controlled by the same people running Israel and China. But if you think they need more attention, post evidence exposing them.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/jewish-population-of-europe-in-1933-population-data-by-country

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/map/european-jewish-population-distribution-ca-1950

These are maps of the jewish population of Europe in 1933 when Hitler took power and then in 1950 a few years after the war when most countries finally updated their census data.

In 1933, France had 225k jews. In 1950, they had 235k jews. France was conquered by Hitler early in the war and under Nazi control for almost the entire war period. Why were basically no french jews killed?

Germany lost about a half million jews, though tens of thousands were sent to what was then British Palestine before the war and tens of thousands more moved to Israel when it was founded after the war.

Poland lost nearly its entire jewish population of about 3 million. Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Austria, and Romania lost a combined total of about one and a half million jews. Italy had a negligible jewish population that saw no significant losses.

The Soviet Union lost about half a million jews. How many of those deaths were at the Nazis and how many were at the hands of the communists is not certain.

This adds up to less than 6 million jews. Note that Britain gained 150k jews during this time Hundreds of thousands more fled to the US. Almost a million moved to Israel after the war, first in anticipation of Israel's founding and then in response to it, the vast majority of them from Europe. So, even using the official numbers from a holocaust museum that exists to spread the belief that 6 million jews were directly murdered by the Nazis, the jewish death toll appears to be closer to 4-5 million rather than 6 million.

But now consider why France would have seen no jewish deaths. Consider that there were 0 death camps liberated by American troops, every so called death camp was liberated by the communists. Consider that over 1/4 of the jewish population of Germany in 1933 lived in Berlin, that east Germany had far more jews in 1933 than west Germany, and that east Germany was taken by the Soviets while west Germany was taken by the Americans and British. So basically all of our evidence for the holocaust comes from the Soviets, as most of the jews living west of the iron curtain survived the war.

Consider that the Soviet communists were themselves mass murderers who killed more people than the Nazis were accused of killing. Consider that the Soviets modified Auschwitz after the war including adding a chimney to the crematorium to make the camp look more ominous. Consider that the death toll at Auschwitz was revised from an initial estimate of 4 million down to 1.5 million to 1 million to less than 1 million, but the overall death toll remained the same through each revision. Consider that the Soviets committed the Katyn massacre, framed the Nazis, and the US government sided with the commies in helping frame the Nazis.

Then consider that there was 0 mention of homicidal gas chambers or mass extermination or of the movement of people who were supposedly exterminated in any of the Nazis' internal encrypted communications intercepted by the allies during the war, including communications between the people running the labor/"death" camps and their commanding officers about nearly every aspect of running the camps. Literally all of the evidence that the labor camps were death camps came after the war as there was no mention of it in any of the communication intercepted by the western Allies (and we intercepted most of their internal communication).

It's much easier to believe that the Soviets massively exaggerated the holocaust to make Hitler look bad and distract from their own war crimes than to believe that the Nazis committed the fourth or fifth biggest mass murder in history with 0 internal communication and did so entirely to the east of a line that wouldn't be drawn until their defeat while leaving most jews west of that line alive. It's also likely that the 6 million number, which has never changed no matter how much the details are revised, comes from the Talmudic prophecy of the jews getting their messiah after 6 million of them are killed, rather than being based in objective fact. The reason you know 6 million jews died in the holocaust but likely don't know how many gypsies, gays, or people of other races were killed in the holocaust, don't know how many were killed by the Soviets in the holodomor and the gulags, don't know how many were killed by Mao, don't know how many people died in the Armenian genocide, don't know how many Americans died in WWII, etc. is because the 6 million number is propaganda, not historical fact.

So the deepstate is trying to get us to fear aliens now so they can pull the alien invasion storyline when everything else fails?

And Disney will suffer the consequences.

She was the one stronk woman I actually liked because she looked the part and was believable at it.

Hitler: 12 million if you believe the USSR's numbers, maybe 1-2 million if you don't. Wouldn't even make the top 5 if the winners hadn't doctored the history books.

Why are the Nazis the go to bad guys when the communists are so much deadlier, and with stronger evidence for their atrocities? Really puts things in perspective.

It's also possible they're trying to cause an actual revolution. Biden isn't just hated by Republicans, a majority of Democrats would have preferred Bernie and many see Biden being almost as bad as Trump from their perspective. If both left and right want to overthrow Biden, that lays the groundwork for civil war. If Biden beats the voter fraud charges, Trump supporters may declare war. If Biden is impeached and removed for voter fraud and Trump is installed as the rightful winner of the election, Trump's haters will claim it's theft and make it their excuse to riot more. They want our military tied up with civil unrest at home so China can incade the US while Islam invades Europe.

Signal for anything illegal or borderline, telegram for messaging friends, gab for spreading memes.

But it was a false flag just like 9/11 (and sorta Pearl Harbor)!

We should harass Jeffrey Epstein into releasing more names publicly.

What? Trump's vaccine is for the Chinese communist virus, not for a made up strain of coronavirus.

Could be the virus and vaccine were specifically designed not to target people with certain genes.

This is all true, and the left pic is even more infuriating because asians and jews are both above whites.

Yup. The people doing all the work of saving the environment are rural working class men who vote solidly Republican.

How the fuck is Greta a Nazi? She's a commie. Commies are much worse. Don't go complimenting Greta by calling her a Nazi.

Qanon is a psyop. If it's a good guy psyop then the predictions are made to throw off their enemies and make them panic, not to tell normies what's going to happen. If it's a bad guy psyop, the predictions are there to distract you from doing anything about the information they use to reel you in. Either way, take the knowledge of corruption Qanon shared and make your own plan to spread that info further and do something about it.

1. You're assuming that because you don't know what caused the big band, it must have been nothing and therefore god. The fact that you don't know what caused it does not automatically mean it was done by a god. That's the same level of reasoning as "what causes thunder/lightning? Must be Thor/Zeus/etc." You're on the same level as pagans making up gods to explain what they don't understand. There are many possible explanations for why the big bang happened, god is only one of them.

2-3. To me personally there's a difference between these things. To the universe as a whole there is not. To me personally it's wrong to fuck an infant or murder a child. To the universe, death and sex have been a part of life for billions of years on this planet and the only right or wrong of it is what works for the survival of your genes and what doesn't. You claim your morality is objective and universal, but you offer no proof other than your feelings, and you can't explain why so many people disagree on what is morally good or evil.

4. I don't "believe" the universe is cyclical, I recognize it as one unproven possibility among many. The universe could be cyclical. The universe could have been created by god. The big bang could have been caused by interdimensional beings or aliens or something that is bound by natural laws but more advanced than us. I don't know which of the many possibilities for how the universe came to be is true. Neither do you, but you replace your lack of knowledge with "god" to explain what you don't and can't know.

5. Kalam is philosophy/theology/conjecture, not science. The universe can't be proven to be finite. If the foundational assumptions of kalam are wrong, then any conclusions that logically flow from them are wrong as well.

6. i was raised religious, I believe evolution because it's provably true and created us., not because of propaganda or not being exposed to other ideas. It's the religious who need thought control to protect their ideas, not scientists. You claim that physics was finely tuned to allow life but can't explain why life is so rare in such a vast universe. If our universe was designed by a creator for the purpose of our existence, why all the extraneous bullshit? Physics could have been designed completely differently from the meta level to the nano level to make our entire universe more hospitable to life, not just the occasional rock that happens to be in the right conditions by random chance out of billions of rocks floatiing through space.

I can imagine a universe more fine tuned to support life than this one, therefore this universe was not designed by a creator with intelligence beyond mine for the purposes of creating life.

1. You have no evidence that something came from nothing, that there was ever nothing and not always something. Nor do you have any evidence that what produced something is a god, let alone any specific god such as the one imagined by wandering sand people whose descendants rape kids to blackmail our political leaders.

2. Your definition of evil is subjective. You don't perfectly agree with anyone on what good or evil means. If there was a single objective definition of evil handed down by a benevolent all knowing and all powerful god, there would be no question as to what's evil or what's good. But there are massive disagreements on what's good and evil. Today most westerners think raping a 12 year old is wrong. Most middle easterners, and even many of the European ancestors of the modern west, consider 12 a ripe age for a girl to get married and think it's not rape to fuck your 12 year old wife. If raping a 12 year old was objectively evil, there would not be this disagreement between middle east and west nor between modern and ancient west. You can believe subjectively that raping 12 year olds is wrong because of the harm it does to innocent developing kids - and I do - but that doesn't make it a fundamental law of nature.

3. You're the product of billions of years of slaughter and non-consensual reproduction. Most of human history is a story of both large and small scale violence, including violence committed by many of your ancestors. Some of those wars were subjectively good because they helped spread human civilization and improved the human gene pool (feel free to disagree on whether that makes them good or not) and others were bad because they destroyed civilization and degraded the gene pool. Violence is not even inherently good or evil, so what do you think is?

4-5. Huge logical leaps. You don't know the universe isn't infinite, we haven't seen nearly all of it yet. You don't know how the universe began or even if it has a set beginning. The universe could be cyclical, expanding from the big bang and then contracting again a hundred billion years later until the conditions are right for a new big bang.

6. One tiny rock among billions has life. Possibly more, which opens up new questions abour how their religions might differ from ours and whether life on Earth is even special. If the universe was created by a god for the purpose of creating life, why create billions of lifeless stars and planets all for one little planet with life? Might as well create a flat earth with just some pretty stars in the sky instead of a whole universe.

Really hoping for Germany 1933 and not the commie ones.

Everything the elite doesn't like is white supremacy.