A jew suggests creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo as artificial within natural.
Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies a gentile choosing to "stand under" the suggested artifice by a jew, while ignoring nature.
What do you think about it?
About/abutan - "being on the outside"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/about
A jew suggests aboutism as fiction (being outside) to tempt gentiles to ignore reality (being inside)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Flat is just the observation
a) Line was perceivable before a flat shape can be observed by ones perception, which only then can be described by suggestion to another.
Does the one perceiving need to use suggestion to describe all perceivable to another ones perception...or does this sound like a fucked up thing to do?
b) Just implies "even"; being able to observe implies being at "odds" with what one observes. What happens if odd (choice) within even (balance) chooses to hold onto a side within a conflict (round vs flat)...imbalanced odds.
https://towardsai.net/p/l/logistic-regressions-journey-with-imbalanced-data
How could I even start to talk about the complex deceptions a jew is suggesting, when gentiles continue to fail at the base of being odd (perception) within even (perceivable)?
The link above has the following quote: "Balance isn't something you find; but something you create"...how could I describe the contradiction in this to a gentile who willingly ignores being choice within balance of nature?
there is no other way to describe it
What if there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life), which doesn't have to be described, since it implies an ongoing line, sentencing each life towards point of death?
And if a gentile chooses to ignore this basic feat of self discernment, how could I ever inspire him to question why scribe implies a "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
Are you really sure that you need to de-SCRIBE anything to anyone else...or could it be a jew who scribbles within reality to distract gentiles with fiction?
unless you use symbols to talk
What if letters shaped into words imply the symbols used to talk?
What if shaping LETTERS into words for talking requires ones free will of choice LETTING a chosen one shape suggestions aka crafting spells?
What if a jew suggests the symbolism of letters to trick consenting gentiles to become letters aka "whisper words of wisdom; let it be"... https://genius.com/The-beatles-let-it-be-lyrics
just be a line
Just being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...if only descriptions by scribes wouldn't be such a distraction, then one could discern this for self.
a) Flat implies a shape; measured by those within a prism of light. It's light which represents the earth/eorþe - "soil" for each shape of seed within.
Soil/soeul/sueil aka sole and soul implies the threshold aka the doorway for each dweller passing through.
b) Flat vs round implies "circular" logic within self "turning" into a conflict of reason against others.
c) To know implies perceivable moving through perception...a flat line allowing a learning curvature to emerge.
Notice that a tube (youtube) is being used to channel current...
Mystery Babylon the Great: Catholic or jewish?
a) Babylon aka the gate (bab) of god (ilu) aka the entrance (inception) and exit (death) of each visitor (life) becomes a mystery aka a secret rite, if the visitor (perception) ignores the path (perceivable) for other visitors (suggestion).
A book describing this path in detail was published in 1678 by John Bunyan - "The Pilgrim's Progress"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pilgrim%27s_Progress
b) Great implies a conflict of reason (less vs great) by a being who strayed from the path of Babylon, and now stumbles through the mist (mystery), while fighting others.
c) Catholic aka cathode aka kata (down) hodos (way), as well as anode aka ana (up) hodos (way) implies each being coming up (living) and down (dying) the way; through the gate (bab) of god (ilo).
d) A jew (you) is being shaped by a gentile claiming self (I) among others. The jewish behavior is shaped by each gentiles consent (ones choice) to a jewish suggestion (chosen one), hence a gentile shirking response-ability onto a jew.
A jew suggests catholicism to distract consenting gentiles from discerning self as anode (living) within cathode (dying). Anode needs to resist cathode...suggestion tempts one to want to ignore resisting.
inversion
Aka within (in) turn (verto) of action (ion). Nature doesn't turn aka revolve around a fixed position...it moves fluid action (inception towards death) through solid reaction (life).
Nature moves linear, hence delineating each beings lifeline.
It's reaction (perception) ignoring action (perceivable) for other reactions (suggestion), which turns a being first inwardly (circular logic), and the outwardly (conflicts of reason).
Jerusalem
Aka yarah (he threw, cast) + shalom (peace)...throwing (inception towards death) peace/piece (life). That's Jerusalem the holy city aka each being at center of whole.
Is the Babylon of revelation
a) The suggestion of what IS conceals what WAS perceivable aka what all (perceivable) reveals through each one (perception).
It's ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring perceivable, which establishes re (ones response) vel (veil of ones ignorance) ation (all acting upon each one).
b) Babylon aka bab (gate) + ilu (god)...a gate represents the entrance (inception) and exit (death) of each visitor (life).
Tower implies building lofty (life) in proportion to its base width (inception towards death)...no matter how high the tower is being build, it's gonna collapse back into its foundation...by the rivers of babylon.
to be the same spiritually
Spirit implies a force of separation, hence separating same substance into each different essence (being).
their allegiance
If a being consents to suggested pluralism (their), then one ignores that allegiance implies all + liege/le (to let go) aka the separation of all into each one...not a binding allegiance between beings.
demonic forces
Dai (divider) mon (provider)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/demon aka provider (nature) forcing division (being).
Prism/prison, hence imprisonment (within prison of mind). So what's a prison? Prison/pris - "to take; seize"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prison
It's ones consent to suggested scientism, which tempts one to take/seize the suggested into ones mind/memory, hence establishing a prison/prism.
Now what about a natural prism? A solid (life) whose bases (inception) or ends (death) are similar, equal, and parallel aka a trilateral column. What's a column? A projection aka a hill (life) to die on (inception towards death).
an answer to
How about this...both questions and answers are arbitrary to the necessity of natures solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life).
What if few trick many to ignore perceivable solution for suggested questions and answers from one another?
How would you break this cycle without answering or questioning what others are doing? As in...how does one describe natures solution to others without using arbitration?
for real
An arbitrary phrase inverting nature...ones response (re) to being forwarded (for) within all (al).
Using "for real" arbitrarily by questioning or answering it, establishes a conflict of reason (yes vs no) aka yes I am real vs no I am fake. That is an artificial conflict...corrupting ones response (re) forwarded (for) within all (al) of nature.
I can explain this from different perspectives, yet I cannot choose for others to change their own perspective back from artificial (suggestion) to natural (perception).
What the fuck are you doing this for?
a) Not for (forwards) aka towards suggested outcome, but in response to perceivable origin. Ones choice needs to respond to natures balance, yet wants to respond to each others choices.
Choice within balance implies being FREE (life) within DOM-inance (inception towards death). The suggested choices by others tempt ones choice into "liberty" to others, while ignoring free-dom.
One cannot get free will of choice from the choice of another without binding self to another, hence contradicting "free". Both questions and answers tempt one to do exactly that...binding free will of choice.
b) Fuck originates from FUGGE aka the fugger family... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family which were originally named "fucker".
That's one aspect of the ongoing revisionism of his-story, another is that a FUGGE/FUGE represents a "masonic joint" aka a mason of free (will of choice) utilizing suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to "join" both together into a wall of ignorance, which represents the wall within many that the few are bewailing.
There's the jewish angle, just like how numerology ties to gematria aka gemara (the second part of the talmud) aka jewish geomancy underneath gentile geometry...
It's real
Isreal...
opinion by friedman
Opinion/opinari/op - "to choose"...any jewish opinion implies an option for each gentile to ignore ones choice for a chosen ones optional opinion.
Taking an option binds ones free will of choice to the opinion of another ones free will of choice.
In reality...each beings free will of choice implies an optional essence (life) within the necessity of nature (inception towards death).
Ally
If one allies self to another one, then one ignores being within ALL, hence not allied/alligare - "bind to", but freed from one another.
Isreal/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies ones resistance within all...not ones alliance with any other one.
A chosen one cannot have an ally without contradicting ones choice by binding it to another.
actual speeds are arbitrary
Motion implies actual; measuring speed from within implies arbitrary.
Matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) implies arbitration aka depending on the will of each arbitrary beings free will of choice.
Speed implies rapidity of movement aka the rapid measuring of ones mind (ment) within motion; hence rapid/rapere/rep - "to seize".
Measuring implies to exercise moderation aka ones free will of choice curbing itself with boundaries.
Light does not have a speed...it's each ray within the visible spectrum of light, which can measure each others temporary speed during ongoing light.
Speed represents a trick tempting ones mind/memory to hold onto arbitrary measurements, while comparing them with other arbitrary measurements.
Nature doesn't need to be measured...all is one in energy. Each one within implies a T-ONE one within tonus (sound) aka an inflection aka a bending of temporal growth (life) during ongoing loss (inception towards death). Few trick many to measure as to be able to artificially modulate natural inflection.
Sleigh of hand...the movie "Speed". Going over fifty (inception) arms the bomb (life); going under fifty (death)...BOOM.
Why fifty? 50/50 aka half of whole aka each one partial (matter) within whole (motion) aka differentials split even aka even sound differentiating tunes aka Looney Tunes...looney/lunatic - "insane" aka in sanus (within sound).
Notice the licence plate of the car used by Jack to enter the bus...TUNEMAN aka the tuning of man... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwcl-mzf3rg
particle is kept in a looping state
A particle (life) within procession (inception towards death) of whole cannot be kept, it can be tricked into a loop (circular logic) while ignoring linear progression.
isolated circuit
A jew suggests information to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore the procession of perceivable inspiration. By holding onto information the gentile establishes a closed circuit (logic) around self; while simultaneously TURNING against one another (reason), which permits a jew to isolate gentiles with artifice (information) within nature (inspiration).
watching changes everything
a) Everything changes...each thing within change choosing to watch each other implies looking/locking onto, while ignoring change.
b) Watch/wæccan - "to be awake"...a jew inverts this by putting gentiles to sleep with suggestion, which tempts each gentile to ignore awakening ones perception.
Using suggestion to put perception to sleep makes one a WICCA (a soothsayer; sorcerer; magician; witch)...so keep watch for the witching hour.
observing alters behavior
a) Being implies alternation of essence (life) during substance (inception towards death), hence each being wielding free will of choice to adapt to alternation.
b) Observe implies holding onto essence, while ignoring substance...a stagnation during alternation, yet only within the essence (matter), not the substance (motion) aka self inflicted ignorance/denial.
c) Behavior implies a contradiction in terms...being + having. A being implies potential during procession. Having implies taking possession of potential, while ignoring procession.
predicting particle behavior
A jew suggests gentiles how to behave...if a gentile consents, then a contradiction was established through suggestion, which permits others to predict ones contradicting behavior during perceivable procession.
If matter (life) ignores motion (inception towards death); then other matter can predict the outcome effortlessly...it's self destruction (logic) and mutual destruction (reason) until death.
Nature implies motion; each thing within implies matter...one can hold onto matter, yet not onto motion.
A jew tricks gentiles to ignore motion by holding onto matter. For example...nature moves perceivable inspiration through one, which one cannot hold onto, only draw from.
A jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to mentally and physically hold onto it, and thereby carry it as an artificial burden within the natural process...a process, which sets each being free (will of choice) from one another, hence coming into being representing an unburdening.
Even simpler...nature moves sound; a jew shapes words within to tempt gentiles to hold onto each DEFINITION, while ignoring sound, hence becoming a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
One cannot define something that moves with words, without ignoring the inherent motion for the external word/brand/idol...that's the foundation for idolatry and jewish spell-craft upon gentiles.
How was your name given to you? By others suggesting it repeatedly until you consented to hold onto it by free will of choice. Well...that implies the domestication of your free will of choice by the suggested choice of another aka ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion.
That's how a jew governs gentiles through spell-craft, and the gentiles perpetuate domestication freely onto each other without even knowing it.
Give a child a name and it's called civilization; do it to an animal and it's called domestication... a domesticated gentile cannot see this contradiction.
The masters of the universe are jews
a) Gentile consent to a jewish suggestion; in this case...THE-ism...shapes gentiles into the slaves of jewish masters.
b) Uni (one) verse (to turn) implies a jew turning gentiles internally (logic) and externally (reason) from natural (perception) towards artificial (suggestion).
c) Nature separates white (pure light) and black (absence of light) to establish the visible spectrum of light...a jew tempts gentiles to mix white and black together, hence "by the power of GREY(gray) skull...I am the power".
Gentile ignorance implies grayskull; gentiles consent to jewish suggestion implies the transference of power (ones choice) onto another (chosen one).
d) I am Adam (primordial man)...prince (life) of eternia (inception towards death).
They either stole or piggybacked on other people's ideas
a) Nature moves and cannot be held onto, hence not be stolen by those within. A jew tricks gentiles to bestow upon one another, while ignoring the moving nature by holding onto bestowed artifice.
b) If one ignores natural (perceivable inspiration) for artificial (suggested information); then one carries the artificial within ones mind/memory; hence piggybacking bestowed fiction, while burdening self within moving reality.
c) A jew suggests ideal-ism as ideas towards gentiles...if consented to; it becomes an idol held within each gentiles mind/memory.
Name one thing besides slavery that those murderous twats ever invented.
a) To invent implies "produce by original thought"...a jew tempts gentiles to think towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
b) Nature moves sound; a jew shapes words/names/numbers within aka spell-craft + numerology to distract gentiles from sound.
Sound cannot be held onto...holding onto words tempts one to ignore that. Gentiles cannot think outside the words suggested by a jew...no other life form uses words to brand sound.
Good/God, hence spreading the Good/God-spell...
starlink
- People they come together...People they fall apart
- No one can stop us now...Cause we are all made of stars
A structure can only be shaped in-between infra (below) and supra (above)...such a structure (life) in-between supra (inception) and infra (death) implies potential aka virtue/virtual.
Suggested VR is neither virtual; nor reality, but fiction draining potential.
James O'Keefe makes a suggestion about Pam Bondi...every viewer consented ALIKE to the suggestion. Before viewing...each one had a DIFFERENT point of view.
This is why viewing anything others are showing..."seems more likely".
What seems more likely...
...the consent given to whatever is being suggested about "Pam Bondi". Before alike consent was given by many towards suggestions by few...each ones free will of choice was different from one another.
privately revealed
Nature revealing each being implies private/privatus - "set apart".
Beings like "O'Keefe" or "Bondi" artificially making private revelations public towards a common audience implies "held together".
Consenting to a suggested revelation implies partaking aka taking a part and holding onto it.
summarize
Aka your mind on tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka trying to establish the sum of all things as the inversion of nature dividing all into each one.
It's a jewish suggestion which summons consenting gentiles into a sum aka into the unwashed masses aka the amounting of many under few aka collectivization.
Wish AI
That implies wanting artifice, while ignoring the need of natural.
Is Everything an 'op?!'
The differentiation from every into each thing aka from cause into effect implies operation/operari - "to have effect, be active, cause".
If effect ignores cause for other effects, then that implies artificial idleness during natural operation, which is commonly called a psychological operation.
the important stories
Nature doesn't import stories...it influences (inception towards death) form (life) through perceivable inspiration. Those within utilize suggestion and consent to import information into memory, which is where they "store" it.
Another word for storing is "deposit", which implies each ones divided (de) position (posit)....not ones pledge into a contract with another for safekeeping as suggested.
viral
Viral/virus - "poisonous substance" aka each ones poise (vir) within all (al)...not anything by others.
Few can suggest anything on a screen, yet only if many consent to look at it, does it go viral aka spread like a virus. It's ones consent to a suggestion, which distracts from ones poise within al, while positioning one in a subordinated stance under the poisonous influence by another.
I don't...I don't ...NO...zero...NINGUNA...cero...nobody...ไม่มีคำพูด...ไม่มี...Hakuna...sifuri...hayaeleweki...
Each of these implies your belief in nothingness aka your consent to suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) aka your de-nial of perceivable aka your own choice to desensitize yourself to reality with fiction.
Nothing implies essence ignoring substance for each other...a simple trick used by a jew to tempt gentiles into becoming senseless.
I don't care
Both nihilism (don't) and Jesus aka je suis (I am) are carried within you as shown by the words you carry forth.
Jesus aka je suis aka I AM...