Wtc 7 was destroyed from the bottom. It was a text book controlled demolition. How do laser beams from space destroy the bottom of the building first? I'm sorry but you've been taken in by lunatic fringe theories aka flat earth designed deliberately to discredit all legitimate questions.
I'd like to see evidence direct energy weapons could even destroy a single brick, let alone a building. The amount of theoretical energy required alone makes it impossible. There are legitimate questions about what actually hit the pentagon. I mean the fbi immediately confiscated the cctv footage from the hotel and gas station across the road if I recall. Then they only ever released a few frames none of which showed a plane, let alone a commercial airliner. The wtc buildings were a different story. The event was obviously designed for maximum visual impact destroying some of the most recognisable buildings in the world. Every TV camera and home video camera was pointed at those buildings. If the buildings exploded without planes it would have been seen on hundreds of home videos. These don't exist, the theory isn't just garbage, it's actually insane. Any kind of 3d holographic projection is also nuts, it can't be done today it couldn't be done then. Videos like September clues are obviously quite high budget productions. I consider them deliberate disinformation designed to discredit the entire 9/11 movement. And it's obviously working, it's got the dullards fooled and us wasting time talking about completely unprovable fringe theories when there is a mountain of hard evidence against the official story.
https://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU?t=29 Yeah. He said they made the decision to pull, then they watched the building collapse. The 'debunkers' just turned it around and they he was only talking about pulling the fire fighters out of the building. But with this guy saying the building was deliberately imploded .. debunkers are no where to be seen.
Ever heard of water jet? If you have high enough pressure/speed water you can cut through anything, including steel. https://youtu.be/quL14Csmi_Y for example.
None of these theories have anything to do with 911. Pieces of the planes were found in the street, at least 1 engine and some landing gear if I recall. They definitely weren't holograms. We know the buildings were laced with explosives, there was seismic data and countless eye witnesses testimony. Wtc7 was admitted controlled demolition. A journalist who was on the scene who I forget his name was interviewed a year or two ago on 911 recalled his experience saying wtc7 was controlled demolition. It was intentionally blown up. The logic was they were afraid it was going to topple over and damage an adjacent building if I recall. He casually admitted this seemingly unaware of the official narrative.
There are plenty of good documentaries that explore the hard science behind why the buildings collapsed. The evidence for explosives and the chemistry behind it. Documentaries about the money aspect, the stock market bets, the war games, the amount of people that were mysteriously absent on the day of 9/11. The warnings prior to 9/11. The ace elevator company. The fact FBI informants lived with the so called pilots. I could go on. And yet people latch onto bat shit insane theories about holograms and space beams, it's a truly sad state of affairs.
If you believe that you can fake something like that, with every TV camera in the world and thousands of witnesses on the ground pointed at those buildings, there is no hope. You are being duped by disinfo. The landing gear and engines if I recall were found on the ground.
The no planers like to content that no planes hit the twin towers. There were literally thousands of witnesses planes at the WTC buildings. It's deliberate garbage designed to derail the 911 truth movement. Exactly what hit the pentagon is a different story.
I bet redditors would love that. They have had a hard on for forced vaccination for a while now. When you tell them medical procedures should never be forced, they go, oh it's not forced, you don't need to go outside. It's totally optional. Yeah breathing is optional too.
“People cannot feel safe just because they had the two doses. They still need to protect themselves,” WHO official Dr. Mariangela Simao told reporters.
People can't see to get their head around nano thermate. It would be like saying, yeah the building collapsed and turned to dust but the dust just happened to turn into a microchip. After all there were silicone and other constituent elements for microchips in there. The nano thermate was an extremely high end material mixed at the nano level. There were only a few labs in the world in 2001 capable of manufacturing such a material. It was also highly explosive, which regular thermite is not, it's more of an incendiary. It should have been an open and shut case. Contact the relevant companies, find out who they supplied in large quantities. But Jones was shut down, forced out of the university. The case could have been followed up upon, but like the financial aspect of 9/11 was deliberately ignored by the relevant agencies in government. Yes the 'chain of custody' of the material could have been better, but the issue was looked at like 5 years after 9/11. But I don't believe that Jones was the only scientist to study the material and come to such conclusions. But even if Jones didn't exist there is plenty of evidence for controlled demolition and bombs, from countless eye witnesses testimony etc. Ie the lobbies of the buildings were literally blown up before the towers collapsed, that is on video. In a controlled demolition they usually weaken the building by cutting up to 20% of the core columns before the implosion takes place. These buildings have massive structural redundancy.