Dentists aren't taught jawbone cavitations exist. Even though they exist in the medical literature. They don't know how to diagnose them and there is no treatment. After I had my wisdom tooth removed I had an mri of my face (done with stir imaging). You could clearly see a 2cm long lesion in the bone. At the hospital I contested the all clear they gave me, waited to speak to the head maxillofacial surgeon with a print out of my mri with the lesion circled. He just wrote off the anomaly as 'normal anatomy'. And that was that. They basically left me to die because at that point my health was declining fast. I then drove with my mum half way across the country with my mum to see a specialist that actually treats these things. When he did the surgery I asked him, how did the lesion compare to the mri image. He said it was identical. I should mention the reason I had an mri was because was because the problem didn't really show up on xray. Cortical bone (the hard part on the outside) is mostly what shows on xray. It's widely understood that you need at least 30-50% destruction of the inner part of the bone before infections are usually visible. What I had in my jaw happens in other bones in the body. It's not a new disease. The rest of healthcare can diagnose and treat them. Mri with stir imaging is the gold standard for detection in long bones. Stir imaging supresses the fat in the image and for whatever reason these lesions show up with this setting. But for whatever reason this type of problem doesn't exist in the dental world. It's an extremely strange reality. But no other bone in the body suffers the abuses the jaw faces. The amount of absesses, extractions, periodontal disease etc. The jaw lives a hard life.
As for implants from what I recall the literature says something like 20% of then have peri-implantitis. That's just the infection they can see. Mechanically they can function quite well but biologically not so well. Implant supported bridges are probably worse, fairly impossible to clean.
Amalgam doesn't chemically bond to teeth. It has a mechanical bond, ie they have to make under cuts to stop it simply falling out. That means the dentist has to remove far more healthy tooth structure for the filling compared to a composite filling which will bond chemically. It's true Amalgam might last longer than composite fillings for back teeth. But at least composites don't poison you with mercury vapour 🤣
There is an E number for edible gold. It's extremely safe in the body as it doesn't really react with anything. Gold crowns are a slightly different story. Gold is a soft metal so they usually alloy it with other metals. If you have an allergy to other metals it might cause you an issue.
My recovery story is actually pretty similar to the guy in the movie. In the movie they recommend removing root canals and replacing with implants. Personally I would never go down the implant root. They too can cause serious problems. Infection around implants is common. But otherwise the documentary was good.
Don't go to a regular dentist to have amalgams removed. Find one that specialises in safe removal. I read removal can expose you to up a years worth of mercury vapour exposure, in a single day. There have been many documented cases of people being ill by having them unsafely removed. Look for an IAOMT dentist.
Definitely a valid criticism. But the question is how does a paper like that even get peer reviewed and accepted for publication if it was so fundamentally flawed? I wonder if it was political pressure that got the paper retracted. It's definitely happened before especially with more controversial topics (autism).
Really good video. I remember last year when the fake news media was fobbing off footage of Italian hospitals, and pretending it was from New York. And they got caught using hospital staff in plane clothes to make it look like lines for covid testing were really long, when in reality almost no one was there and those facilities were basically empty. 100% government propaganda and the media is in on it.
I have no doubt they cheated like hell in this election. The problem is I think even if fraud is 100% proved, and proved to have changed the outcome of the election I can't see it making a difference. It'll just be like Gore vs Bush in 2000 which went to the supreme court.
If you follow the links on the page it takes you directly to the data ie https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+40983312
Cavitations have a bunch of names. NICO, cavitational osteonecrosis, ratner bone lesion. NICO is a bad name, the first part stands for neuralgia inducing, which the vast majority of lesions are. They are usually silent and painless. Anyway he might know one of them.