You, maga et al are the most prolific trump posters here.
He says based stuff sometimes, but then you see him wearing a red string kabbalah bracelet, and you realize he's really part of the cult.
http://expandourmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Putin-Kabbalah-String.jpg
-
Hiroshima Revisted: The evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the nuclear bombings by Dr. Michael Palmer
-
Death Object - Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax by Akio Nakatani
-
My Atomic Bomb Findings: The grand manipulation 1945-2021 - the website of Anders Björkman, where he describes in detail his decades of research into the claim that Nuclear Bombs exist.
Original researchers into this topic are listed below, for anyone interested in this topic who wants to read more extensively about it:
-
Hiroshima Revisted: The evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the nuclear bombings by Dr. Michael Palmer
-
Death Object - Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax by Akio Nakatani
-
My Atomic Bomb Findings: The grand manipulation 1945-2021 - the website of Anders Björkman, where he describes in detail his decades of research into the topic.
You don't seem to like those sources I linked above, but really, they are not original researchers, merely relaying and summarizing the research of others (without attribution in the case of Mathis, I believe).
Original researchers are listed below, also for anyone interested in this topic who wants to read more extensively about it:
Hiroshima Revisted: The evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the nuclear bombings by Dr. Michael Palmer
Death Object - Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax by Akio Nakatani
My Atomic Bomb Findings: The grand manipulation 1945-2021 - the website of Anders Björkman, where he describes in detail his decades of research into the topic.
Follow some of the links and info given in these articles:
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hiroshima-firebombed-not-nuked/
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/nuclear-bombs-do-not-exist.html
http://mileswmathis.com/bikini.pdf
I'm not taking a hard line with this. But I believe we definitely don't have the full story, as to the development and use of nuclear bombs. Perhaps they tested some which were somewhat real early on. Or maybe all tests were faked, one way or another. Many intelligent and reputable physicists believe the Apollo Moon landings were exactly as NASA said they were, for example. I'm sure there are ones who even observed the rocket take-offs first hand and never doubted that they brought those astronauts to the moon.
There is plenty of documentation from the atomic bomb tests which are essentially manipulated photos, film shots from impossible angles (i.e. from within the blast zone, looking back at a house being destroyed, which in fact essentially looks like a minature being blown up), flimsy wooden structures still standing, after the explosions, too close to the test area, etc.
The 2 bomb drops in Japan were likely actually napalming of those largely wooden structured cities, by 66 air force planes documented to be in Japan at the time. Witnesses described being surprised how much the aftermath looked like the aftermath of a firebombing and not like some new phenomenon. People survived unscathed in the basements of wooden structures and had no radiation sickness when they emerged. A 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the alleged atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki found radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations. Pictures of so-called radiation burned bodies could equally be bodies that have been chemically burned by napalm.
Used just twice in "combat", outside of a testing situation. Tests are controlled situations, done far from civilization and prying eyes. The documentation came from the people who did the tests, and is therefore fakeable. And that documentation does show signs of trickery.
Follow some of the links in these two articles if you interested further... or don't, whatever:
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hiroshima-firebombed-not-nuked/
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/nuclear-bombs-do-not-exist.html
There are other sources of radiation burns. A nuclear bomb is literally the absolutely least likely cause of radiation burn. Also, and more pertinently, how do we know they were radiation burns, and not chemical burns? See if you can tell me which is a radiation and which is chemical, by photos alone:
No cheating and looking at the address bar....
I can't think of answers to either of your questions right now. Certainly the pictures and propaganda don't cut it.
The old documentary footage of the testing, and of the aftermath in Japan, is not evidence of their existence. I think if they existed, they would have been used more than twice already. They were used just twice, days apart. And never again. And yet we are all supposed to live in fear of them. It's the most useful hoax of all time.
How do you know they were increased due to nuclear testing? How do you know they were increased?
Nuclear bombs have allegedly been used just twice, long before you were born (I'm presuming).
Not entire nations. The people who control them, though, can obviously be in cahoots, and part of a common cult. I believe this has been the case for close to 130 years, at the very least. There were so many big hoaxes in the 20th century it's genuinely incredible... except that one by one, they collapse upon open-minded research.
Nuclear science is clearly not allowed to be seriously done by anyone without that nation's government's approval and it being involved somehow.
If you want more insight on how it's possible, you could look into how true physicists, the genuinely curious ones and not the government career stooges, know that much of what Einstein theorized has largely been ruled out by subsequent observations and experiments... and yet he's still held up as the pinnacle of Physics.
The dearth of evidence to the contrary of his theories has been ignored and suppressed for decades in the the mainstream... you can't get funding if anything you do creates evidence that contradicts Einstein's theories. A wealthy and powerful group of people (and their cohorts, successors and inheritors) with similar ideologies and goals, actively ensure that.
Having said that, I don't think they are a coherent group. I think it's clear that they struggle against each other for bigger shares of power, wealth and influence.
But some lies, like nuclear weapons for example, are just too useful to all of them, and so they continue fund, propagate, protect and build upon those lies.
Add to that the saying: It's practically impossible to get a man to disbelieve something if his career and livelihood depend on him believing it.
Is a radiation burn evidence of a nuclear bomb?
I mean it's highly likely. Have you seen soros lately? The only thing keeping him alive are his transfusions of young teenage blood
Yes, you are taking a farcical position. That of flatly believing in something you've clearly never looked into with an open mind. And that of believing Israel's keeping other nations "in check" is a positive thing.
As I said, you take a farcical position, and now you try to defend it with ridiculous ad-hominem. Path-e-tic.
First: Trusting Israel to keep another in nation "in check" is a laughable position... but anyway
Second: I wonder if there isn't more to the desperation to keep Iran, and other "outsider" nations, from developing nukes.
There's a line of thinking, supported by evidence, that nuclear bombs were fake at the beginning and could still be impossible now. Early demonstration footage of test nuclear explosions has been obviously faked (miniature models being "blown up", impossible camera angles, footage splicing etc) and the aftermath of cities that got "nuked" in Japan bears a striking resemblance to a mass fire bombing campaign, like what happened in Dresden. Witness testimony, at the time reported in mainstream press but forgotten about now, has people sheltering in the basement of wooden houses, and surviving, and not experiencing and deadly nuclear illness when they emerged from their hiding place. Only the wooden buildings were completely destroyed, back when the majority of buildings there were wooden, so it looked devastating. However concrete buildings remained standing, if scorched, and right at the supposed "ground zero" too...
Israel's desperation to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons could actually be about preventing them from fully realising that Israel doesn't really have nukes, nor does America or any other nation...
James Corbett did a report on this study last year, I remember it being pretty good.
An American former Attorney General, Francis Biddle, was one quarter of the Judicial team at Nuremberg, where most testimony given by Nazis was obtained through torture. I wonder had that trial taken place in America instead, would that testimony have been allowed...
Nominating /u/BlackDay2020/ 's suggestion for a discussion based on the WEF / Klaus Schwab's promised / threatened imminent "Cyber Pandemic" of ransomware attacks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yevgeny_Zamyatin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobotomy
His life and the fact that he lived in Europe for a while suggests to me he was influenced by the early history of "invasive physical therapies" for "mental conditions" in Europe. The timing is right.
Check out the bio of the inventor of the lobotomy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant%C3%B3nio_Egas_Moniz
Jesuit... Freemason... family name changed...
Of course, vaccines are coming from a similar background of unesscessary, invasive medical intervention... Also Huxley's "soma" comes to mind, the drug that had the same effect as Zamyatin's "great operation"
I saw this when you originally posted to r/conspiracy, it's excellent. You really pack a lot in! I'm a little surprized to see from your youtube description that the thread on r/con was removed. Did you ever get a reason for that? Check the mod log?
Is that a conspiracy?