Prof Norman Fenton did an interview about this:
And it's just been announced she will face retrial for the attempted murder charges:
Highly detailed website detailing why Letby is likely innocent and the victim of a massive miscarriage of justice. There is a shorter article covering some of the same justifications for this position here:
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/11/lucy-letby-must-be-allowed-an-appeal/#comments
I'm surprised I haven't seen much coverage of this. News reports I read described the case as slam dunk. It's anything but.
Another less technical summary article can be found here:
We also have a community filter that I would probably learn to use proper if we need it. It involves writing code, YAML, which I don't now. Pity there is no GUI for it.
it looks like this:
The irony
I find it interesting that for the first 3-4 decades after Roswell, when UFO sightings became more and more frequent (and generally accepted by the masses as a real but unexplained phenomenon), the Airforce and Military intelligence worked hard to discredit all sightings as nothing, and created a program for studying them that's real function was to collect the sightings and discredit/dismiss them as nothing. They were largely successful, turning the UFO phenomenon into a topic to be mocked by the masses rather than be curious about.
Then, seemingly suddenly, since about Reagan, UFOs become a psyop to bring about world unification under a NWO/ One World Government, with increasing disclosure drip fed about the reality of , now renamed UAPs and taken relatively seriously. You had numerous popular UFO/alien movies in the 80's made seemingly realistically with a serious tone (Flight of the Navigator, E.T., Close Encounters) rather than the ludicrous and fantastical type of movies that came before.
It's an almost total reversal, though done gradually over time.
This was directly instigated by George Bush Senior during the final weeks of his term the previous year. As Michael Collins Piper describes it, once he lost the election, he used the final weeks of his presidency to go after the ADL. It eventually came to nothing under the next administration. But interesting all the same.
A more detailed blog post he wrote on the above:
https://news.gab.com/2023/09/why-elon-cant-bantheadl-even-if-he-wanted-to/
thanks for the multiple suggestions, but could you please make them separate comments so people can vote on them individually. Votes on this comment will be for your 1st suggestion, so just make another comment with your 2nd. Your 3rd, The Dimming, has already been suggested.
This seems a like a suggestion for a "round table" thread. We didn't do one of those in a while either, so next week I think.
oh yes, there is no way to notify like real apps yet AFAIK
No function for mass notifying really. I'll ping users in the thread when I make it. Anyone who has replied in this thread.
If we had a list of subscribers we could ping more easily, that would be a bit like sending mass notification. Alas the mod tools are a bit bare bones, no access to subscriber numbers or user names or anything like that.
Found it on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cAEOM41wkSwu/
Banning doesn't do much good, since trolls just make new accounts, and then you loose track of them for a while. We're better off leaving them have their accounts so we know which accounts are trolls.
Having said that, if you want an account banned for being vile, you should at least try not to be vile yourself, Ep0ch. I might take the suggestion more seriously then.
rupert sheldrake and electric universe theories.
Post that here! I've read a couple of his books.
I'd say it's conscious for many
yeah, that looks like it, but it's also available at the source domain of link above:
https://www.thebernician.net/the-three-faced-terrorist-part-one/
it's basically a bunch of news clips from the time, followed by the livestream in it's entirety, with minimal commentary.
I presume this was recorded by his side lol.
Did the BBC air this interview?
it's "Global Boiling" now
They have a youtube channel with many videos, just discovered it today:
The anon who posted this infographic said the map is from the down time the 4chan website experienced over this past weekend. Don't know if that can be confirmed since Downdetector seems to show only a rolling 24 hr period. The info on the right of the image is accurate though:
4chan.org/pol does not work
boards.4chan.org/pol works
use this knowledge wisely
The argument for her innocence is multi faceted, scientifically and statistically based. The same case made for her guilt (just without the garbled note) could be made of any nurse working there at that time. The state of the evidence is literally that weak. Watch the Norman Fenton interview for a quick summary: https://youtu.be/k12f_VFCbtI The sewerage issue is serious and there have been similar cases in the past of sewerage problems in hospitals killing premies. And indeed they speak about one example where they were going after a nurse for a baby's death before the sewerage problem became apparent. No one saw her inject air into any baby, and the air in one baby has multiple possible explanations and causes. Indeed, the expert for the prosecution quoted a study to back up his testimony that was about the wrong type of air embolism as was supposed to have killed a particular baby, showing he was talking out of his ass. No one picked up on it because it takes people familiar with the literature to have that knowledge and spot the "mix up" (if it wasn't intentional) The alleged over-doses of insulin again has other possible explanations, and one of the alleged "spiked bags" of insulin used to kill one baby was chosen at random and given to the baby by another nurse when Letby wasn't working. All babies were declared death by natural causes in each and every autopsy done contemporaneously, yet the Jury was told by one unqualified, professional-expert (who tendered his services as a professional expert directly to the police) they were all wrong. Are you saying she didn't behave as if innocent? That's not very convincing and highly circumstantial, like every single bit of "evidence" in the case. It could be she is simply browbeaten by the MSM and her former bosses seeming so certain she's guilty. She's young and has no money. I would wonder if she's not the sharpest tool in the box either. Like just an ordinary, somewhat simple person. Not cynical. They had some doubts about her competence, and after the critical report of their hospital, these doubts blossomed into accusations of murder. I know women who trained to be nurse who aren't smart. You don't need to be smart to be a nurse, you're trained. But to battle egotistical doctors trying to cover their asses in court you need to be smart, cynical, well off and have great council.