??? this is the exact same post I made 2 hours ago. Even title is copy/pasted.
Another interesting article by the same author which is still live:
https://johnmenadue.com/theres-still-time-for-talk-over-ukraine-but-western-minds-remain-closed/
In particular it was the fact that you spammed 20 or more of them in a short period. All 100% CIA/NATO approved (and probably authored) MSM takes. You posted them seemingly unironically. They are r/politics & r/news material. One or 2 or even 3, spaced out, I would ignore - and I do. but no one wants so much of that bullshit clogging up the new queue.
I presume you were escalation. This is not the forum for spamming MSM takes unironically and without due analysis. For that I recommend r/news and r/politics on reddit.
This started for me from doubting the planes we saw were the planes we were told that they were.. I now think the more sensible researchers dismissed absolutely everything that was told by authorities on 9/11 and start from scratch. Such as the planes. We have no way to tell, aside from authority telling us, and planted "evidence", that those 2 planes that hit the towers are the passenger planes they say they were. "no planes" is a stupid term - better I think is a label like "weird planes" or even "fake planes".
There are documents going back years prior to 9/11 that show there has been enormous military interest and investment in finding away to make eye witnesses believe they are seeing something which is either not there or its appearance is enhanced or partly faked. Some of that research was concerned explicitly with faking some aspect of the appearance of planes in the sky.
This video doesn't put any of the existing doubts about the planes to rest. There's no new info in this video, just a different angle on the same action that's seen in every other video. In fact the plane isn't even seen in as great detail as in multiple other pieces of footage I can think of.
there doesn't appear to be an updated document concerning side effects/adverse reactions in this dump. The most up-to-date is a document already released in January 2022 (linked there) called "post-marketing experience" and it's dated April 2021.
This release doesn't even seem like 55,000 pages to me. Also I don't believe there is an updated "post-marketing experience" document, which seems to be the label they use for examining adverse reactions. The most up-to-date one is from an earlier release and the report is date April 2021. If I'm wrong please someone let me know.
Just going through the titles for the first time. Kind of curious why this document is included:
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-201114-hiv-preferred-terms.pdf
Scroll down and click page 2 for the beginning of the March 1st dump.
Shot through the head with no known motive. She was known to be pushing to make BLM a pro Palestinian movement. Yeah I wonder what could have happened.
British anon, in this /pol/ thread:
You need at least 20 point score on your account to be able to vote
Filled to the brim with flammable fuel.
Planes are mostly filled with empty space. The fuel is in two tanks in the fat parts of the wings. In a catastrophic plane crash, at top speed say, maximum destruction, the majority of that fuel burns off in the fireball resulting from crash impact. Fires are then prolonged by whatever other "fuel" is present at the location of the crash which was set alight by it - for example the wreckage of the plane itself and the matter it crashed into. The flammability of that material, and access to oxygen, would be the determining factors as to how long that fire would last.
Or perhaps Ukraine builds their high rises to a higher standard than the old WTC?
It's probably the best introduction to 9/11 there is, for most. It was my introduction. But despite it's length it's not comprehensive. It also may include, probably unintentionally, some disinfo.
They're basically mercenaries. They get paid to murder and terrorize (or to pose for training photos) and in their down time spend the money on heroin and shit.
As to the whole Neo-Nazi thing - I'm not sure these guys know much about Nazism or history in general - either the fake history we learn in school, or the real type you discover in bits and pieces over time. If you've ever seen up-close photos of these guys - they're basically just retards and junkies. It's kind of funny actually. The Nazi thing is probably some kind of PsyOp they've been manipulated into so that they can be justifiably eliminated once they cease being useful.
Even better PDF link with all the images in tact:
https://files.catbox.moe/wg9htt.pdf
The other PDF was one I made before I discovered someone had made a better one.
Sorry, pdf link dead, here it is re-uploaded:
With the New York bound planes there are supposedly Air Phone calls. However they are very dubious. There is a very long old forum thread which goes into them in great detail. I base my claim about the drill on that thread:
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/pdf/Fog_Fiction_and_Flight_11_Phone_Calls.pdf
I made a post about it:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/13zNFYMyh6/some-excellent-and-exhaustive-re/c
Yeah there are two highly circulate pieces of footage - charges going off in WTC7, and a white plane/missile like object hitting the side of the pentagon - they are completely fake. Someone thought maybe they were doing a favor by showing how they think it happened, or it was intentional disinfo. They always get shared on 9/11 threads on 4chan.
It was in front of this statue, late at night, at the CERN facility that someone videoed with their phone what appeared to be a ritual sacrifice - in the video it looks like a woman gets stabbed. It was uploaded to the internet and instantly people said it must be a hoax. I looked into it and there was never any police investigation, there was only an internal CERN investigation and they quickly labelled it a prank. But I don't believe the person who uploaded the video ever came forward and said that. And in the video, to me he seems genuinely shocked when he sees the ritual.