Don't you wonder at all why you can't provide a simple measurement that contradicts the law i've stated?

You haven't stated a law, so I have made no effort to provide a contradiction. Once you state a law, not just your own summation of thought, then we can discuss it.

Everyone who has measured the surface of still water and excluded the negligible (and known) surface tension artifacts. Many scientists and lay people going back centuries.

Great! Could you please provide the name of one, and their findings?

Of course it can, and does.

Do you have an example of something we can observe at rest, in midair?

Gas always expands to fill "space"

At what point though does the weight of gas combat the property of it to continue expanding?

Just because something is written in a book does not make it consistent with reality.

I agree!

Similarly, just because a comment is written by you and you claim it's a law, also doesn't make it consistent with reality, That is exactly my point.

The reason it is a law is because it has only been measured to be correct

Who made measurements of the law as you've exactly stated it? Or are you simply referring to the general idea?

Things tend towards rest, not motion

Correct, but something with weight cannot rest in midair, thus they move down towards the earth.

So does gas displace space without gas?

A flimsy excuse.

If we're going to discuss laws, especially ones that you claim have been agreed upon by others, then we should discuss it as it is written, not using our own summations of what we think it says.

I'm sorry, but I will not entertain otherwise.

You're not following. We aren't discussing understanding

I realize you are avoiding the topic, but your understanding is exactly what I'm talking about. If we have different understandings of how a law is applied, then that should be addressed.

Both!

Wrong. Your summary of a law != the law as written.

All matter has weight.

Great! So does gas not move downward as a result of having this property?

Please describe this "reverse logic" in detail

By this I mean, if you're reasoning is because you cannot think of another reason why something is the way it is, it's not something I can accept. I accept evidence, but not speculation.

It is a scientific law; air pressure is derived from and contingent upon the container walls.

Is that a scientific law, or is that just your own words?

I try to stay open to as many ideas as i can, even when they seem ridiculous. You might give it a try!

If the idea is ridiculous, then I consider it a fun thing to talk about, nothing more. Not something that I think should carry a lot of weight.

Speaking of, weight is a property of matter. Does gas not have weight?

it can be soundly deduced that a "dome" (container of some sort) exists because we have sustained and consistent air pressure.

Reverse logic won't work with me, unfortunately. There could, theoretically, be other reasons why we have a sustained air pressure. You can't just say that it must be this because you can't think of another possibility.

we don't know what the dome is made of, assuming it is real

So now you're open to the idea that it's not real, and may not exist. Great! Let's expand on that. What other reasons could there be?

World War 1 didn't end at 11:11

Dome figuratively, yes. Dome literally, perhaps not.

Let's stick to literal then!

Is there a dome at all that is over the flat earth? One that can be seen, felt, or measured?

Do you actually not know about any or all of that?

Oh I've heard LOADS about it. Nobody can seem to point to anything concrete to support it though.

Not only that, I think I might have accurately deduced it.

Does the particular value matter that much? If the world isn't spherical, then the numbers are most likely wrong in any case.

Well I'm curious on what values were measured regarding the dome.-

Also, how can you say that you've never seen a dome depiction in egyptian reliefs when earlier you declared this?

The ancient egyptians conceived of a flat earth with a dome stretched out over it.

Dude how tf is only dating women anti-Semitic? Are you retarded?

What are you talking about? Whose gender?

No kids because I haven't gotten anyone pregnant yet, and I don't have the means/lifestyle to support a child currently. I still exclusively date women.

We'd need to measure it, assuming it exists to measure, in order to know that!

So even though the ancient egyptians conceived a flat earth with a dome, there may not be a dome, ergo they may be incorrect.

Some speculate that it is the diameter of the known world

So about 8,000 miles? That is what's taught, but I don't know if you have another value in mind

What's more likely is you have an emotional investment in the argument

What emotional investment are you supposing I have?

In what sense?

My grandmothers passed years ago, and my nieces and nephew are doing great! Pretty healthy kiddos

k

It doesn't matter if you know a thousand people it's not enough people to deferentiate the rise in unexpected death

If there was so much unexpected death, it seems highly fortunate that it hasn't affected anyone in my social web. Almost...impossible.

Run a poll via text or messenger pigeons whatever means you use to communicate with your co-conspirators

I don't have co-conspirators, friend.

which is what the graph demonstrates

Not necessarily. These could be kids who are gay, and just more comfortable coming out earlier in a society that is more likely to accept them as they are.

You may not turn gay, but children get confused much easier.

So it's not about the vaccine anymore? Because that's what the original post is about, vaccines turning people gay.

Probably, but I haven't gotten one in a couple years. At this point I'm not that worried about it.

So only one person agrees with you'?

Well I don't use facebook, so that's not it.

Also, if someone gets sick, that's no reason to delete them. That'd be pretty retarded.

Any other bright ideas?

Probably because it's more accepted, and people are more comfortable coming out as gay.

Do you think straight people are becoming gay?

Phew!

Okay so then my whole social web of vaxxed people is all doing pretty solid!

No I meant when am I supposed to turn gay, not when will there be flags sometimes.