Jericho.
This was a semi B-rated TV show that was cancelled during the second season. The premise is that the US is nuked. I don't want to spoil anything, but I got some serious "whoa, somebody was killed for letting this show get past the filters" vibes. Once they got enough into the story, I felt like this was the nuke version of one of those 9/11 predicting movies. It's also a really great show with good acting, if you can ignore the absolutely horrible Hallmarkesque soundtrack.
Who will enforce this universal ban, and will they do so while using guns for self protection?
Perhaps the Khmer Rouge will peacefully enforce the law, using their non-terrorist communist enforcement arm?
What could go wrong?
Great article; thanks, man. Ultimately, as the author alludes to, these kinds of language skills are sort of innate. The conclusion the author, unfortunately, never comes to is that these skills are basically a manifestation of high intelligence. Instead, he assigns them as traits of sociopathy.
I wonder if the primary reason for the use of the hero story in all of modern literature and film is specifically to prepare us for this moment, so that they have long enough to act while we wait for our hero, and then we are all gone…
https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/1974/CPSC-Issues-Ban-On-Vinyl-Chloride-In-Aerosols
It was only banned in aerosols.
Between this stuff (spurred by the Scott Adams tweet), and Elon musk's "soon" tweet in response to Cuby or whoever that rapper guy was that was asking about when the Covid scam will be revealed, I feel like some kind of false flag bullshit is going to happen really soon, if they are going to get out ahead of this sudden vial growth in interest in black crime stats.
Twitter Link:
https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1628783583107371009
Moments like this are inspiring, but we have to remember that this (Covid) is the "fourth turning", etc.; the third was 9/11. We don't know what happened on 9/11 or who the exact perpetrators were. The motivation to find out has been washed away, by the sands of time and the salience of the fourth turning. Those of us who still care are left with many competing theories. One of those theories is likely correct, many elements are true in each of the theories, but here we are, 22 years later, and we don't know what the full truth actually is. They don't admit anything and they don't make the kind of mistakes we expect them to make. If they make mistakes, it's because they meant to, to throw us off their trail.
So maybe the next chapter is the "great reveal", but it's all part of the game.
Not the same Daegel:
https://www.corbettreport.com/but-what-about-deagel-questions-for-corbett-video/
I mean, I know that somebody at the very top ones a lot more than 50% of the population gone, but I feel pretty confident in assuming that they would be perfectly happy with 50% as a starting point, and if we assume that the "vaccines" they issued will protect against some form of a biological weapon that they are planning to release (I don't know what kind - I don't think viruses are real - but the "vaccines" could very well be protecting against something completely different), then they would be reducing the population by half, and a half that would be dying would be the people that are most likely to fight against them, and then from that point they could do whatever they wanted, including further cutting the population down.
If we are trying to imagine the worst case scenario, And we are taking our egos out of the equation, then we have to come to the conclusion that, if this truly was a plot by the evil people behind the scenes to get rid of half of the population or more, I can't imagine a more realistic scenario than what I've described.
Excellent post. This whole thesis, pertaining the legal system being fundamental to the plot, reminds me of Kymatica, which I highly recommend to anyone who hasn't yet seen it:
What's really sad is that I hope you're actually right… the only alternative, in my opinion, and the thing that I've mentioned many times here, including above, is that the "vaccine" isn't a bioweapon, but instead, is the only preventative for the impending nightmare that comes next; and that nightmare is so bad that the huge increase in deaths from the "vaccine" was a necessary evil. There are two versions of this nightmare, and, unfortunately, one of them fits perfectly with what you're saying as well. The first version is what I described in the OP, which is a scenario where some form of disease was leaked/stolen from some lab, and they needed to get ahead of it with this vaccine at any cost, and the second version is a situation where the DOD is involved in a plot to essentially do the exact same thing, inoculate people at any cost against something that they will then release. In this latter version, the thing that I've always said corroborated this potential outcome is the notion that the powers that be (think supranational, like you are suggesting) want to get rid of everybody who is not compliant, and what better way to do so then to get rid of all of us and our ilk...
I just now heard of this, from Royston Potter. What does this actually mean? Any thoughts on this? I feel like this is actually portending something much worse, because, under what scenario would it be normal for the department of defense to be doing something like this, unless there was something much worse that they knew that we didn't. I'm not suggesting that the department of defense is a bastion for good behavior or that they are not involved heavily and all kinds of evil things, but plotting the demise of our entire population doesn't seem like something they would have been doing, which means there's something else going on (I'm always thinking back to the notion that there is something much worse coming and they were actually trying to prepare us with the poison vaccines, and if that was the case, it would make the coming situation even worse, given that they were willing to allow hundreds of thousands to die from the "vaccines"... I don't know, maybe I'm over thinking it, but this has been my worst fear all along, and there was that guy from the British Parliament just the other day (somebody posted it here) who said some thing about how he didn't know if the vaccine hesitant we're going to win in the end… What do these people know that we don't? Fuck.
One thought: the department of defense was working on something much more sinister than anything we could imagine, some kind of biological warfare that would wipe out Russia (Ukrainian labs, etc.). This got out, somebody stole it or something, and instantly they had to create a fake virus scare to get everybody afraid so that they could force everybody to take a vaccine that would inoculate them from this thing that was stolen/leaked. I'm only trying to keep an open mind, because I realize what I'm saying here would imply a great degree of white hat stuff going on, and at this point I'm a little past believing that these people are even capable of doing good. At the very least, I think it's silly to use the argument that "these people just don't know what they're doing". I know government in general is typically incompetent, but that kind of money and power and manpower behind something this large is too big to simply explain as some kind of failed plan or incompetency.
It is actually good.