Most doctors are just doing what they're told and what they think is right. You are creating a very dangerous logical fallacy here.
You are falling into the normie trap. Normies try to understand conspiracies by assuming everyone has to be "in on out" when in reality, only a few puppetmasters at the top are required.
Flu is a scam. "Flu" has been the scapegoat for the hundreds of thousands of death per year caused by medical malpractice and the poisons of Big Pharma.
Now they are calling "flu" COVID.
All of those graves are totally fake
Sadly, they aren't. This is a genocide of humanity, and it's not due to a fake virus. The only "fake" is COVID.
JP Morgan bailed last minute because his wife "had a bad feeling."
Also, wasn't it a different ship they sunk for insurance money or something?
Correct...Olympus vs. Titanic.
Anyone who tells you that's been "debunked" probably believes the government's version of 9/11.
How do the jews differ from the jesuits?
The Jesuits are the military/esoteric arm of the Catholics, so def different from the zionists/jews.
Masks are required to prop up the illusion of the pandemic.
lol:
If Trump had German shepherds in the White House, we'd already know the ethnicity of who got bitten.
Am I reading too much into this?
What about Joe's "broken" foot from the dog?
These have to be comms right?
Dogs are comms too...any analysts here?
Weird that I spent the last 10 years warning everyone about a plan to use a fake virus and vaccine to usher in the new world order.
Not sure what to do now that it's here heh.
No but seriously, how many stories like this do we need? Now they don't have to parade the dogs around anymore and pretend they're acting living at the WH.
Does anyone else see this? lol this planet.
People will double and triple down their commitment to the COVID hoax for the rest of their lives before admitting they were bamboozled.
In my current series of articles on fake epidemics—Ebola, Zika, Swine Flu—I’ve established that all the symptoms of these so-called diseases can be explained without invoking a virus.
This is a key.
It was my method, when I wrote my first book, AIDS INC., in 1988.
At that time, I looked into the AIDS “high-risk groups” listed by the CDC—Africans, Haitians, IV drug users, gay men, hemophiliacs, and blood-transfusion recipients—and I showed that the immune-system collapse (the hallmark of AIDS) in these groups could be explained without the need to refer to HIV at all.
“AIDS” was not one condition.
It was immune-deficiency caused, in various people, by a variety of factors. The hypnotic medical trick was welding all these sick and dying people together under one umbrella label: “AIDS.”
But the truth was—depending on which “AIDS group” and which individuals you were looking at—you had debilitating medical and street drugs destroying immune systems; you had devastating hunger and starvation; lack of basic sanitation; grinding poverty and war; vaccination campaigns; adrenal collapse…
Likewise, today, with a vast relabeling effort, any patient with any sort of lung problem, or flu-like illness, can be diagnosed and repackaged as a case of “COVID-19.” The loose set of so-called COVID symptoms allows for such fraudulent and deceptive diagnosis.
This is the central con.
Back in 1988, after combing through medical journals, I found that the number-one cause of T-cell depletion (immune-system collapse) in the world was malnutrition/hunger/starvation. Yet, in Africa and Haiti, and even in certain Western patients surviving on junk-food diets, T-cell depletion was routinely called HIV/AIDS.
Suddenly, a virus was invoked to substitute for malnutrition.
In fact, in Africa, the earlier label for AIDS was “slim disease.” That fatuous idea was invented via a deeply flawed investigation in Uganda, where the patients were “slim” simply because they were malnourished and starving, and consequently losing weight.
In New York and San Francisco, some gay men were inhaling a brutally dangerous street drug called “poppers.” Severe lung damage was just one of the drug’s many devastating effects. Profound immune-system deficiency was sure to follow.
In AIDS INC., I lay out a whole parade of immune-system destroyers in the high-risk groups; and none of these destroyers has anything to do with a virus.
—Just as in Wuhan, in 2019, the deadly chronic air pollution hanging over the city and causing pneumonia—the original hallmark of so-called COVID-19—had nothing to do with a virus.
So when uninformed people bleat, “People are dying, it must be the virus,” whether they’re talking about AIDS or COVID, they’re completely off the rails and on the wrong track.
Here is another parallel between AIDS and COVID: the test for the virus.
I’ve spent many articles detailing how the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 spits out false-positive results like water from a fire hose. A doctor will tell a patient he’s infected simply because the sensitivity of the test is so jacked-up it’ll register positive on a speck of dust on the moon. This is artificial case-number building at its finest.
Well, back in 1988, there was a similar situation. The HIV antibody test was turning out a Niagara of false-positive results. I devoted a chapter in my book to the results of my extensive medical-journal search.
The evidence was undeniable. Both basic types of HIV antibody tests—the Elisa and the Western Blot—were, admittedly, deeply flawed. There was no gold standard for testing.
Cross-reactions were abundant: the test for HIV would come up positive for a whole host of reasons that had nothing to do with HIV, or any other virus. One reason? A person had received the hepatitis B vaccination. Well, in the 1980s, a campaign was launched to recruit gay men into a large study of the new vaccine.
A third parallel between AIDS and COVID: expanding the definition of the “disease” in order to rope in as many patients, and build up as many case numbers, as possible.
The 1987 CDC definition of AIDS, which I printed in my book in full, took up 15 pages. With a bit of rigmarole, a doctor could diagnose AIDS in a person who had almost any kind of bacterial infection.
The CDC definition of COVID-19 allows a diagnosis when the patient has nothing more than a cough, or chills and fever, accompanied by a positive PCR test.
There are other parallels between AIDS and COVID I could list, but you get the picture. In both instances, the hoax is rampant.
A few years after I published AIDS INC., I became aware of a new argument: the very existence of HIV was in doubt. Consulting the independent literature on the subject, I became convinced no one had proved HIV existed. In these pages, I’ve published, several times, an illuminating interview journalist Christine Johnson conducted with Australian biophysicist, Eleni Papadopulos, about HIV isolation. Papadopulos makes a compelling case that, according to rigorous rules laid down by mainstream researchers, HIV hasn’t been isolated.
As my readers know, for the past year I’ve been offering compelling evidence that SARS-COV-2 has never been proven to exist. Researchers twist and reverse the meaning of the word “isolation,” in order to “demonstrate” the virus is real.
The non-existence of HIV and SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t surprise me. After all, the so-called symptoms of both “conditions” can be explained without reference to a virus.
In both cases, the reality, which lights up like a giant neon sign in the darkness, is FRAUD.
COVID will accelerate this. An entire generation of children will be almost entirely devoid of artists.
If you think this bodes well for humanity you're really dumb.
no! What's that one about? I'll check out the Star Trek one too...you had me at Archons :D
stickied! Had some connection issues for a few minutes.
The Jesuit Sinking of the Titanic to Create the Federal Reserve Corp.
Hm...so the Captain of the Titanic was a Jesuit? Funny that isn't mentioned on his Wikipedia page.
Now let's check out the Wikipedia page for "Jesuit conspiracy theories" lol.
Let's see how they "debunk" the Titanic Captain=Jesuit theory...hey look they just cite a shitty book and use appeals to emotion and logical fallacy to "debunk" the theory. SHOCKING:
In their book Titanic & Olympic: The Truth Behind the Conspiracy, historians Bruce Beveridge and Steve Hall debunk various conspiracy theories about the sinking of the Titanic, including one that the Jesuits were responsible, which they describe as falling into the category of the "completely ridiculous".
lol. OK guys, pack it up! It's ridiculous!
According to that theory, in the early 20th century, the Jesuits were seeking a means to fund their schemes and wars. In 1910, at a clandestine meeting which was hosted by J. P. Morgan, seven major financiers, all of whom were either controlled by or in league with the Jesuits, came to an agreement on the need to eliminate outside competition in the banking world and create a central bank which would be backed by the United States Government, a bank which would later be known as the Federal Reserve.
This scheme, however, was opposed by certain influential businessmen such as Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidor Straus and John Jacob Astor IV. In order to eliminate those three powerful "enemies", the Jesuits ordered Morgan to build the Titanic and arrange for them to board it for a pre-arranged fatal maiden voyage.
HOLD UP. Literally NO ONE claims this. There is NO legitimate "conspiracy theorist" in 2021 who believes the Titanic event was created SOLELY to off these three individuals. The fact that Wikipedia uses this to "debunk" this theory is so patently absurd it's almost painful.
This is the same logical fallacy embraced by NPCs regarding the COVID hoax. They love to spout this talking point: "so you think COVID was faked just to get rid of Trump? lol you're so stupid that's ridiculous!"
An actual intelligent assessment of the COVID hoax is that the removal of Trump was one of the many goals. Those who try to dismiss this theory by saying how "ridiculous" it is that COVID was staged to "get rid of Trump" fall into the same trap as those dismissing the Titanic conspiracy.
The elimination of various opponents of the imminent Federal Reserve Act was one of MANY different goals of the Titanic staged event. First, evidence suggests the ship wasn't meant to be SUNK during the false flag, and that another ship was supposed to be nearby to rescue more people. IOW, the death toll was way higher than expected...they weren't trying to kill EVERYONE.
Again, the "removal" of the Titanic for insurance purposes was a big part of it...in the ensuing confusion certain targeted individuals could be "removed" and then blamed on the disaster. You didn't need to sink an entire ship to remove 3 people. The fact that Wikipedia presents us with THIS being the theory requiring "debunking" says EVERYTHING you need to know that they are actually presenting us with a blatant cover story. Continued:
The theory includes the claim that Captain Edward Smith was a "Jesuit temporal coadjutor".
So...no attempt to debunk the theory that Captain Smith was in fact a Jesuit? Hmmmmm....
The "accidental sinking" was arranged by having Smith's "Jesuit master", Father Francis Browne, board the Titanic and order Smith to run his ship at full speed through an ice field on a moonless night, ignoring any ice warnings including those from the lookouts, with the purpose of hitting an iceberg severely enough to cause the ship to founder and the three businessmen to drown.
In other words, the Titanic was built and then sunk, and her crew and passengers sacrificed, to eliminate three men.
There it is folks, the logical fallacy of the "deboonker"
As evidence of Conspiracy on Rome's part, the conspiracy theorists cite Browne asking permission from his Jesuit superior to proceed with some potential wealthy american benefactors, in which he received the reply telegram unambiguously saying "GET OFF THAT SHIP – PROVINCIAL",[28] and that after the sinking, all opposition to the Federal Reserve disappeared. It was set up in December 1913, and eight months later the Jesuits had sufficient funding to launch a European war. Beveridge and Hall note that the theory never considers "why conspirators in 1910 would feel sinking a ship was an economical way to eliminate 'enemies' or how they would arrange for all three victims to board a specific ship on a specific voyage two years later".
Haha fuck you "Beveridge and Hall" and fuck you Wikipedia for spouting this utter drivel.
The plan wasn't necessarily to sink the ship. The elimination of the Titanic was a multi-faceted plot, and the fact that you are pigeonholing the conspiracy into one possibly fallacious conspiracy theory is as retarded as it is revealing.
Remember, they claim he got 81 MILLION votes. Honestly I’m starting to believe he didn’t get 18 MILLION.
If you're one of those people who say "Biden won because Trump sucks" then you probably should consider self-lobotomy at this point to spare the rest of the planet from your abject idiocy.
It's precisely this mentality that permanently destroys the possibility of ever holding a valid "election" again.
Because of the pervasiveness of this talking point among NPCs, all the "elite" has to do to convince the public to go along with a stolen election is by having them robotically repeat the psychotically fallacious mantra.
”Blue Anon” Google vs Duck. As far as Google is concerned Blue Anon is a ski goggle.
haha where did THAT come from?
BLUE ANON: A network of Democrat voters, politicians and media personalities who spread left-wing conspiracy theories like the Russia Hoax, Jussie Smollett hoax, Ukraine hoax and Covington Kids hoax. Blue Anons fervently believe that right-wing extremists are going to storm Capitol "and day now".
Today:
With all due respect...are you suggesting there aren't 15...or even 25 or 35 "organic" users here upvoting content on /new in the morning/early afternoon?
I uploaded multiple threads of a similar image during the busy traffic time...all to make a point. I'm assuming folks understood the message being sent here and why I didn't consolidate the images into just one thread.
Each image speaks for itself separately, and the point is better made by the volume of posts.
There's nothing nothing to gain from artificially giving yourself a dozen votes on an image like this.
Since these were all submitted at the same time, wouldn't it be expected that it will get the same number of upvotes from the users currently active on conspiracies.win?
If anything, if one of these threads was wildly off (say 50 compared to 15 for the rest)...then THAT might be evidence of fuckery.
This is totally a non-observation from my perspective, but I do appreciate the thread and concern.