Again, if you're upvoting one of those posts chances are you're going to upvote all of them.
Exactly. It would be weird if one of these was way off (like 50 upvotes when the rest have 15). I submitted a bunch of separate threads to make a point, and I assumed the even amount of upvotes are from people who saw that and upvoted. 15 is so small too.
To be honest, I thought you were Axolotl.
This is my only account on .win and I'm no longer on reddit.
With all due respect...are you suggesting there aren't 15...or even 25 or 35 "organic" users here upvoting content on /new in the morning/early afternoon?
I uploaded multiple threads of a similar image during the busy traffic time...all to make a point. I'm assuming folks understood the message being sent here and why I didn't consolidate the images into just one thread.
Each image speaks for itself separately, and the point is better made by the volume of posts.
There's nothing nothing to gain from artificially giving yourself a dozen votes on an image like this.
Since these were all submitted at the same time, wouldn't it be expected that it will get the same number of upvotes from the users currently active on conspiracies.win?
If anything, if one of these threads was wildly off (say 50 compared to 15 for the rest)...then THAT might be evidence of fuckery.
This is totally a non-observation from my perspective, but I do appreciate the thread and concern.
Exactly. It would be weird if one of these was way off (like 50 upvotes when the rest have 15). I submitted a bunch of separate threads to make a point, and I assumed the even amount of upvotes are from people who saw that and upvoted. 15 is so small too.
This is my only account on .win and I'm no longer on reddit.
With all due respect...are you suggesting there aren't 15...or even 25 or 35 "organic" users here upvoting content on /new in the morning/early afternoon?
I uploaded multiple threads of a similar image during the busy traffic time...all to make a point. I'm assuming folks understood the message being sent here and why I didn't consolidate the images into just one thread.
Each image speaks for itself separately, and the point is better made by the volume of posts.
There's nothing nothing to gain from artificially giving yourself a dozen votes on an image like this.
Since these were all submitted at the same time, wouldn't it be expected that it will get the same number of upvotes from the users currently active on conspiracies.win?
If anything, if one of these threads was wildly off (say 50 compared to 15 for the rest)...then THAT might be evidence of fuckery.
This is totally a non-observation from my perspective, but I do appreciate the thread and concern.