Whatever is happening, it's some High Grade Fuckery.
spread it like you're vaxxed!
I was way more naive back then, but even then I could tell that this shit was horrifically wrong.
Spoiler: we still win
The pressure is building. “Take the vaccine.”
Many people are looking for a successful way to refuse the COVID vaccine in situations where the shots are mandated. I fully support such efforts.
Some people believe they can make the argument that the FDA didn’t actually give full approval to the Pfizer vaccine on August 23rd. Therefore, these people can refuse the vaccine on the grounds that it is still experimental, meaning it has only been granted Emergency Use Authorization.
I’ll discuss that practical strategy later in this article.
But first, I need to analyze the claim that the FDA didn’t truly approve (license) the Pfizer vaccine.
OK. Here we go.
The first FDA document I’ll reference is “Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” dated August 23, 2021. The document opens with this statement:
“On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.”
“The FDA approved” means full approval. The FDA has fully approved the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.
And this vaccine “will now be marketed” as the Comirnaty vaccine.
They are the same vaccine, medically speaking. The ingredients are the same.
The FDA document ALSO says the vaccine will continue to be available under the prior Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), for uses that are not yet fully approved. For example, injecting children 12-15, and as a third dose for certain immunocompromised people.
The full approval and the EUA status are riding together, side by side. The EUA status covers uses of the vaccine not covered under full approval.
The rest of this FDA document offers links. One of the links leads to an FDA news release, dated August 23, titled, “FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine.” The release states:
“Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty…”
“To support the FDA’s approval decision today, the FDA reviewed updated data from the clinical trial which supported the EUA and included a longer duration of follow-up in a larger clinical trial population.”
The FDA, in this news release, is again asserting that the Pfizer vaccine is now approved, and makes a clear distinction between the prior EUA and this new approval.
Next, we move to a letter, also dated August 23, sent from the FDA to BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, and Pfizer Inc. The letter is marked, “BLA Approval.” BLA stands for “Biologics License Application.” Here are key quotes:
“Please refer to your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted and received on May 18, 2021, under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA.”
“We are issuing Department of Health and Human Services U.S. License No. 2229 to BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, Mainz, Germany…Under this license, you are authorized to manufacture the product, COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA…You may label your product with the proprietary name, COMIRNATY…”
The FDA officially licensed this vaccine. This is approval. It is not merely a continuation of Emergency Use Authorization (EAU).
And now we come to another key FDA document, a letter sent to Pfizer Inc. on August 23, 2021 (addressed to Ms. Elisa Harkins). It also mentions the full licensure (approval) of the vaccine:
“On August 23, 2021, FDA approved the biologics license application (BLA) submitted by BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH for COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 16 years of age and older.”
This letter is further acknowledgement that the vaccine has been fully approved.
Now we enter the thick weeds of the letter, during a discussion of how Emergency Use Authorization will continue to be used. The language is very dense. It’s taken me a while to separate out the strands.
To help you with what I’m going to untangle, understand that the FDA is making a distinction between what we could call the “old Pfizer vaccine” and the “new Pfizer vaccine.” They are identical in their ingredients. They are the same vaccine. But the “old vaccine” vials were granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) before the August 23rd FDA full licensure of the vaccine; and the “new vaccine” vials will certainly be used under full licensure (approval).
Splitting hairs? Yes. But in order to understand what the FDA is saying in this letter, you have to grasp the distinction between “the old” and “the new.”
The “old” vaccine is labeled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine,” and the “new” vaccine is labeled “COMIRNATY.” Again, they are exactly the same vaccine.
The FDA letter to Pfizer (the one addressed to Ms. Elisa Harkins) states:
“On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA [Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccine] is appropriate to protect the public health or safety…FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA.”
The “old vaccine” will continue to have EUA status: it can be injected in people 12 and older, and it can be used as a third dose for certain immunocompromised individuals.
The “new vaccine”—which has full FDA approval—CONTINUES TO ALSO HAVE EUA STATUS—and therefore it too can be injected in people 12 and older, and used as a third dose for certain immunocompromised individuals.
Strange? Yes. The “new” and fully approved vaccine retains its former EUA status. It’s BOTH fully approved and certified as an emergency experimental product.
I believe the FDA reasoning goes this way: the agency wants to make sure vials carrying the label of the “new” fully approved vaccine can be injected into people to whom the full approval doesn’t apply—people between 12 and 15, and certain immunocompromised people, as a third shot. In other words, people covered under EUA status.
If you continue to read this FDA letter, you’ll see this reasoning spelled out.
Bottom line, and my conclusion: The FDA has fully approved the “new vaccine” AND it has also retained the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the “new vaccine.” Both.
—So what does all this mean for people who want to find a workable reason for refusing the vaccine?
For example, suppose you work for a major corporation or a government agency, and you’re told you must get the shot. You say, “No, I won’t take the shot, because the FDA never approved it. It’s still an experimental medicine, because it only has EUA status.”
I believe you’ll lose. You’ll be told, “The FDA HAS approved it.”
Suppose you take a somewhat different approach. You say, “I’ll need to see the actual vial containing the vaccine you want to inject me with. Is it labeled ‘Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine’ (the ‘old’ vaccine) or ‘COMIRNATY’ (the ‘new’ vaccine)?”
Your boss says, “What difference does it make? Either way, it’s the same vaccine.”
And you say, “Not legally speaking. I understand it may take some time for the new shipments of the COMIRNATY to arrive. I won’t take the Pfizer-BioNTech shot because it only has Emergency Use Status, and therefore it’s an experimental medicine. Under federal law, I have the right to refuse an experimental medicine. I’m invoking that right.”
Will that fly?
I’m giving you non-lawyer opinions here. Understand this.
It’s possible this approach could buy you time. Maybe your boss will suddenly become a bit nervous—he tells you he’s going to talk to his company/agency attorneys, and he’ll get back to you.
Or maybe he threatens to fire you on the spot, and he tells you to hire (and pay through the nose for) a lawyer. You do. Do you think your argument will stand up in court? I don’t. Maybe I’m wrong. I’d like to be wrong about that.
Maybe your lawyer will suggest other approaches. A religious exemption, for example. Or, depending on the circumstances, a medical exemption.
But after reading the FDA documents I’ve cited above, I say that if you think the FDA hasn’t actually approved the vaccine, you’re mistaken.
This country, and other countries, are being split into the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Communities are dividing. Families are dividing and fracturing. It isn’t a pretty picture.
Here in America, we’re used to living life as usual and believing that coercion isn’t going to come to our front doors. Despite the lockdowns and the mask mandates and the vast financial destruction of the past year, many people still think things are “all right.”
That’s not true.
I support all legal efforts to keep freedom of choice alive. I support the unions that are demanding NO VACCINE MANDATES. I also support those governors who are defending their states against COVID restrictions and vaccine mandates. People who criticize these governors because they aren’t perfect or are partially compromised are barking up the wrong tree. We need all the help we can get.
However, as far I’m concerned, putting all our eggs in the basket of court cases, legal filings, unions, and governors is shortsighted, to say the least.
Freedom always needs more. Freedom needs brave business owners to stay open and maskless, despite government edicts. Freedom needs parents to keep showing up at school board meetings, to demand an end to COVID restrictions and mandates.
Most of all, freedom needs patriots, in the best sense of the word, to do what people in Europe and Australia are doing: come out in the street in great numbers. Over and over.
Not by the thousands. By the millions.
For as long as it takes.
The enemies of freedom have to feel the heat. They have to see that the people can’t be forced beyond a certain point.
Whether we like it or not, whether we know it or not, the day is coming when, not the minority, but the majority of us will know we are living under tyranny.
Not just insanity; tyranny.
We will know it in ways that are undeniable.
Some of us already know it.
We’re all living through a test of faith. Each individual; and whatever he/she has faith IN. How deep is that faith? How strong?
SOURCES:
(rushed sources list; to be indexed)
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/default.aspx
I've read like 20 articles on this and I don't think I get it yet o_O
Can folks access this? This first time I tried I could, but then now I'm getting "page not found"...
yes of course, my mistake! I usually do.
you still believe this "virus" is real? sad.
Evidence of Directed Energy Technology on 9/11
This thread has everything.
yeah negotiations/prisoner exchange etc
Told you this was a Deep Fake Presidency.
UPDATE - Taliban spokesman denies any such meeting with the CIA took place.
LOL what a shit show!!!
If you've been following the "Havana Syndrome" story you'll want to file this one, because according to this New York Post article shared by B.W., it's now occurring in Germany. But why file this one? Well, it's full of the usual reportage about these events, and confirms the overall pattern. But there's something else that caught my eye, a couple of new details:
Americans stationed in Germany are latest victims of Havana Syndrome
Firstly, note the occurrence of the same pattern that has been reported, beginning in Havana, Cuba in 2016, and spreading elsewhere:
US officials stationed in Germany developed symptoms of the Havana Syndrome, a mysterious ailment linked to suspected radiation attacks that have stricken hundreds of American spies and diplomats around the world.
At least two US officials were treated after developing nausea, severe headaches, ear pain, fatigue, insomnia and sluggishness, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The cases were among the first reported in a NATO country that is home to US troops and weapons. Diplomats said US officials suffered similar ailments in other European nations, according to the report.
At least one other Havana Syndrome case was reported among US officials based in Berlin last month, according to NBC News.
The symptoms were first reported in 2016 by US diplomats in Cuba, where the suspected “sonic attacks” changed the brain structure of 40 former staffers at the US Embassy in Havana.
(One) patient told the paper he experienced piercing ear pain, high-pitched electronic noise and pressure in the ears before being afflicted with other symptoms.
This is exactly the pattern exhibited in other occurrences of "Havana Syndrome": sudden piercing sounds, seemingly coming from nowhere, ear pain, headaches, nausea. It may be recalled that people who experienced the assault in the US embassy in Havana complained of loud, "metal-on-metal" grating noises, usually confined to a specific area, such as their bed.
Once they left the area, the phenomenon stopped. This fact suggested to me that the phenomenon was produced by multi-beam mixing, and that once one moved out of the area of interferometry, the phenomenon would either stop or at least be significantly attenuated.
But that's not what caught my eye here.
In this article, there are two new details which, I suspect, have entered the story, and that perhaps are coming from the intelligence world. Here's the first detail:
The attacks have also occurred in China, Russia and Austria, and have long been suspected to be connected to Russia. Many victims were intelligence officers or emissaries working on Russian-related issues.
Now, in the current blame-Russia-for-everything atmosphere, it's not surprising that there would be a Russian connection here. Indeed, it cannot be discounted, because a passing familiarity with mind manipulation technologies and multiwave beam mixing technologies will show that the Russians during the Soviet era perfected a number of such devices.
Moreover, there is a very strong case that they used them, and that they used them on Americans particularly, especially embassy personnel. This revelation not only makes the most recent incident of the Havana Syndrome "fit the pattern" but now extends that pattern back into history to the 1970s. And just because Russia is no longer Soviet does not mean it's above such activity. We'll get back to that point.
The second new detail, however, is even more interesting, especially when viewed from my tendency to crawl right to the end of the overloaded high octane speculation twig (and sometimes off of it altogether). That detail is this:
A CIA task force headed by an official who was involved in the search for Osama Bin Laden is currently probing the cause of the hard-to-diagnose symptoms, which have reportedly afflicted as many as 200 Americans.
This is where it gets interesting, because a "CIA task force headed by an official who was involved in the search for Osama Bin Laden" strongly suggests that the task force is composed of remote viewers, because they were actively involved in that search for Bin Laden. If that high octane speculation be true, then that highlights the second half of that very revealing sentence, that this task force is "currently probing the cause...of the symptoms."
Now I don't doubt for a moment that that's all they're looking for. They're probably also looking for some sort of confirmation (or denial) that the Russians really are behind these attacks. In other words, they're looking for whose behind them and if possible what the objective(s) is or are. But again, what intrigues me here is that they're looking for the actual cause of the symptoms.
Given that the basic technique of beam-mixing and modulation are well established in the literature of mind control technologies, one wonders why a remote viewing task force would be tasked with determining the cause of the symptoms; after all, the pattern thus far - and as far as we've been told - fits the use of such technology quite well.
So again, why task a remote viewing task force to "probe the cause"? One answer might be that there is information or details from the victims of Havana Syndrome that has not been publicly revealed, a detail which might challenge my more "nuts-and-bolts" view of the cause, and locate it somewhere else. What might it be?
One possibility is that they may suspect these attacks - while mimicking the effects of nuts-and-bolts technology - are the result of remote influencing attacks, rather than technological ones. Indeed, if there is a pattern of the victims being associated with Russian affairs, it would seem to increase the difficulty of targeting them by a nuts-and-bolts technology, especially one based on interferometry, since that would require knowing their locations. (In this regard, it is also significant that many of the original attacks occured at night, when the victim was conveniently located asleep in bed.)
A remote influencing attack might be able only to "locate" such targets much more efficiently. In other words, we might be looking at a full-scale "psy-war" of some sort.
Which brings us, once again, to the Russians, for they were deeply involved in all manner of classified paranormal research during the Soviet era, and it simply stretches credulity to believe they suddenly stopped. However, virtually every other major power has been involved in such research as well.
Communist China most certainly is, the United States obviously was or we wouldn't even know about things like remote viewing. So, as of now, other than an odd coincidence of its victims having something to do with Russian affairs, there's little real evidence to confirm that Russia is behind these attacks.
It could equally be someone else, attempting to ratchet up tensions between the USA and Russia, someone else either with access to the nuts-and-bolts technology, the more eosteric technologies of remote viewing and influencing, or both.
So I don't know about you, but for me, this story continues to be one to watch...
haha yeah this is SUPER on the nose.
Hey guys...GUYSS!!!! Kamala is on a SUPER important trip right now.
OH NO GUYS GUYS!!! Her flight is delayed!!
OOH IT'S DUE TO HAVANNA SYNDROME ARE YOU SPOOKED OUT?
SO SPOOPY!
There is no vaccine court option for EUAs, sadly, just an administrative procedure that denies 94% of applicants
the 8/23 approval letter to Pfizer says "the products are legally distinct"...I'm telling you this is a bait and switch
Who cares about the next variant? The plan is to vaccinate everybody with a liability free vaccine that no longer works by making the public think they are getting a licensed product. But instead they will be given an EUA. FDA pulls rabbit from hat
I recruited Dr. Meryl Nass for a /r/conspiracy AMA when this all went down (back when /r/conspiracy wasn't a shell of its former self and still held AMAs).
Dr. Nass continues:
FDA had to issue one...sparing Pfizer liability. The dangers of the vaccines were not part of the original plan. So the adverse events were covered up, and Woodcock the HCQ schemer issued a license in name only, while actually vaccinating Americans with the (identical) EUAvac
more proof, IMO, of fighting behind the scenes.
They are playing cat and mouse with the DS, OR they are stringing us along.
Either way, this game is NOT sustainable, and the dam WILL burst.
OK I'll bite.
Imagine if these results came out pre-Afghanistan.
Now imagine their impact post-Afghanistan.
You should know by now that I'm not "trust the plan"-er, but the difference 10 days has made is extraordinary.